Teaching for excellence in K-8 science education: Using project 2061 benchmarks for more effective science instruction

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 222-232

  Hammrich, Penny L ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041106530     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487197048003007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bates, J. A., & Culpepper, W. L. (1991). Using pseudoscience to teach science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21(2), 106-111.
3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal reflections. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Close, E., Miller, J., Titterington, L., & Westwood, D. (1996) National standards and benchmarks in science education: A primer. Columbus, OH: The Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
6. Cobern, W. (1991). World view theory and science education theory (National Association for Research in Science Teaching [NARST] Monograph #3). Manhattan, KS: NARST.
7. Cobern, W. (1993). College students conceptualization of nature: An interpretive world view analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 935-951.
8. Cobern, W. (1995, April). World view reality as viewed by students: A synopsis of methodology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
9. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
10. Ganem, B. (1993). What about science for non-scientists? Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(2), 84-86.
11. Hammrich, P. L. (in press). Confronting students conceptions of the nature of science using cooperative controversy. The American Biology Teacher.
12. Hurd, P. D. (1992). Perspectives for the reform of science education. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(5), 353-358.
13. Jones, W. T. (1972). World views: Their nature and their function. Current Anthropology, 13(1), 79-109.
14. Kearney, M. (1984). World view. Navato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
15. Keeports, D., & Morier, D. (1994). Teaching the scientific method. Journal of College Science Teaching, 24(1), 45-50.
16. Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and hermeneuzic mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenalogical Psychology, 14(2), 171-196.
17. Lawrenz, F., & Gray, B. (1995). Investigation of world view theory in South African context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 555-568.
18. Linn, M. C. (1992). Science education reform: Building on the research base. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 821-840.
19. Lythcott, J., & Duschl, R. (1990). Qualitative research: From methods to conclusions. Science Education, 74(4), 445-460.
20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Nuffield Primary Science: Science Process and Content Exploration. (1993). Living things: Their environment. London: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust, Collins Educational.
22. Ogunniyi, M. B., Jegede, O. J., Ogawa, M., Yandila, C. D., & Oladele, F. K. (1995). Nature of world view presuppositions among science teachers in Botswana, Indonesia, Japan, Nigeria, and the Philippines. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 817-831.
23. Perry, C. M. (1990, April). A pilot study of preservice and inservice teachers' beliefs about effective teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
24. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzong, W. A. (1982). Accommodations of scientific conceptions: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
25. Roth, P. A. (1989). Ethnography without tears. Current Anthropology, 30(5), 555-569.
26. Rutherford, F. J. (1996). A perspective on reform in mathematics and science education (Monograph #2, Project 2061). Columbus, OH: The Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education.
27. Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Schneps, M. (Producer & Director). (1987). A private universe [Videotape]. Santa Monica, CA: Pyramid Film & Video.
29. Strassenburg, A. A. (1996). A perspective on reform in mathematics and science education (Monograph #3, The National Science Teachers Association). Columbus, OH: The Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education.
30. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Vos, K. E. (1996). A perspective on reform in mathematics and science education (Monograph #1, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). Columbus, OH: The Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education.
32. Wheeler, G. F. (1996). The standards are coming! Are we ready ? Journal of College Science Teaching, 25(5), 308-309.
33. Yager, R. E. (1992). What we did not learn from the '60s about science curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 905-910.