De-escalation of commitment in software projects: Who matters? What matters?

Information and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 99-110

  Heng, Cheng Suang ^a   Tan, Bernard C Y ^b   Wei, Kwok Kee ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

De escalation of commitment; Peers; Provide assurance; Shoulder blame; Software projects; Sunk cost; Superiors

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

DE-ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT (DOC);

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0041691113     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00030-2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. T. Abdel-Hamid, S.E. Madnick, Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
2. Ashton R.H., Kramer S.S. Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research. 18(1):1980;1-15.
3. Avlonitis G.J., Hart S.J., Tzokas N.X. An analysis of product deletion scenarios. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 17(1):2000;41-56.
4. Bobocel D.R., Meyer J.P. Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: separating the roles of choice and justification. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(3):1994;360-363.
5. Brockner J., Rubin J.Z., Lang E. Face saving and entrapment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 17(1):1981;68-79.
6. Brockner J., Shaw M.C., Rubin J.Z. Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: quitting before it's too late. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 15(5):1979;492-503.
7. Caldwell D.F., O'Reilly C.A. Responses to failure: the effects of choice and responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal. 25(1):1982;121-136.
8. Conlon D.E., Garland H. The role of project completion information in resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal. 36(2):1993;402-413.
9. Conlon E.J., Parks J.M. Information requests in the context of escalation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 72(3):1987;344-350.
10. Drummond H. De-escalation in decision making: a case of a disastrous partnership. Journal of Management Studies. 32(3):1995;265-281.
11. Dulek R.E., Motes W.H., Hilton C.B. Executive perceptions of superior and subordinate information control: practice versus ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. 16(11):1997;1175-1184.
12. Ewusi-Mensah K., Przasnyski Z.H. On information systems project abandonment: an exploratory study of organizational practices. MIS Quarterly. 15(1):1991;67-86.
13. Fox F.V., Staw B.M. The trapped administrator: effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24(3):1979;449-471.
14. Furnham A., Stringfield P. Congruence in job-performance ratings: a study of 360° feedback examining self, managers, peers, and consultant ratings. Human Relations. 51(4):1998;517-530.
15. Gordon M.E., Slade L.A., Schmitt N.E. The science of the sophomore revisited: from conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review. 11(1):1986;191-207.
16. Harrison G.L. Satisfaction, tension and interpersonal relations: a cross-cultural comparison of managers in Singapore and Australia. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 10(8):1995;13-19.
17. Heath C. Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk cost: the role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62(1):1995;38-54.
18. Holzbach R. Rater bias in performing rating: supervisor, self, and peer ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. 63(5):1978;579-588.
19. Huang S.J. Early project estimation in the formal communication protocol development. Information and Management. 38(7):2001;449-458.
20. Keil M. Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly. 19(4):1995;421-447.
21. Keil M., Mann J. The nature and extent of IT project escalation: results from a survey of IS audit and control professionals. IS Audit and Control Journal. 1(1):1997;40-48.
22. Keil M., Mixon R., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V. Understanding runaway information technology projects: results from an international research program based on escalation theory. Journal of Management Information Systems. 11(3):1995;65-85.
23. Keil M., Robey D. Turning around troubled software projects: an exploratory study of the deescalation of commitment to failing courses of action. Journal of Management Information Systems. 15(4):1999;63-87.
24. Keil M., Tan B.C.Y., Wei K.K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., Wassenaar A. A cross cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly. 24(2):2000;299-325.
25. G. Keppel, Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
26. Leatherwood M.L., Conlon E.J. Diffusibility of blame: effects on persistence in a project. Academy of Management Journal. 30(4):1987;836-847.
27. Lee R.M., Robbins S.B. Measuring belongingness: the social connectedness and the social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 42(2):1995;232-232.
28. Lyytinen K., Mathiassen L., Ropponen J. Attention shaping and software risk: a categorical analysis of four classical risk management approaches. Information Systems Research. 9(3):1998;233-255.
29. McCarthy A.M., Schoorman F.D., Cooper A.C. Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: rational decision-making or escalation of commitment. Journal of Business Venturing. 8(1):1993;9-24.
30. Montealegre R., Keil M. De-escalating information technology projects: lessons from the Denver International Airport. MIS Quarterly. 24(3):2000;417-447.
31. Moynihan T. Coping with client-based people problems: the theories-of-action of experienced IS/software project managers. Information and Management. 39(5):2002;377-390.
32. Newman M., Sabherwal R. Determinants of commitment to information systems development: a longitudinal investigation. MIS Quarterly. 20(1):1996;23-54.
33. R. Nisbett, L. Ross, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1980.
34. Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37(3):1986;348-356.
35. Northcraft G.B., Wolf G. Dollars, sense, and sunk costs: a life cycle model of resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Review. 9(2):1984;225-234.
36. Sandelands L.E., Brockner J., Glynn M.A. If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: effects of persistence-performance contingencies, ego involvement and self-esteem on task Persistence. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73(2):1988;208-216.
37. K. Shaver, The Attribution of Blame, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1985.
38. Simonson I., Staw B.M. De-escalation strategies: a comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology. 77(4):1992;419-426.
39. Staw B.M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review. 6(4):1981;577-587.
40. B.M. Staw, The escalation of commitment: an update and appraisal, in: Z. Shapiro (Ed.), Organizational Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 191-215.
41. B.M. Staw, J. Ross, Behavior in escalation situations: antecedents, prototypes, and solutions, in: L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1987, pp. 39-78.
42. Whyte G. Diffusion of responsibility: effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76(3):1991;408-415.
43. Whyte G. Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: a prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 54(3):1993;430-455.
44. Yukl G., Guinan P.J., Sottolano D. Influence tactics used for different objectives with subordinates, peers, and superiors. Group and Organization Management. 20(3):1995;272-296.
45. Zmud R.W. Management of large software efforts. MIS Quarterly. 4(2):1980;45-55.