Correction (DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046);Timing of Class II treatment: Skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 481-489

  Dolce, Calogero ^a   McGorray, Susan P ^b   Brazeau, Lisamarie ^c   King, Gregory J ^d   Wheeler, Timothy T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

^c NONE

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848836643     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. Proffit W.R., and Tulloch J.F. Preadolescent Class II problems: treat now or wait?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 (2002) 560-562
2. King G.J., Keeling S.D., Hocevar R.A., and Wheeler T.T. The timing of treatment for Class II malocclusions in children: a literature review. Angle Orthod 60 (1990) 87-97
3. Tulloch J.F., Medland W., and Tuncay O.C. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 340-347
4. Tulloch J.F., Phillips C., Koch G., and Proffit W.R. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111 (1997) 391-400
5. Tulloch J.F., Proffit W.R., and Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111 (1997) 533-542
6. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 40-50
7. Johnston L.J. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments. In: Vig P., and Ribbens K. (Eds). Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph 19. Craniofacial Growth Series (1986), Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 103-147
8. King G.J., McGorray S.P., Wheeler T.T., Dolce C., and Taylor M. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 489-496
9. Tulloch J.F., Phillips C., and Proffit W.R. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 62-72
10. Wheeler T.T., McGorray S.P., Dolce C., Taylor M.G., and King G.J. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 (2002) 9-17
11. King G.J., Wheeler T.T., McGorray S.P., Aiosa L.S., Bloom R.M., and Taylor M.G. Orthodontists' perceptions of the impact of phase 1 treatment for Class II malocclusion on phase 2 needs. J Dent Res 78 (1999) 1745-1753
12. Littell R.C., Miliken G.A., Stroup W.W., and Wolfinger R.D. SAS system for mixed models (1996), SAS Institute, Cary, NC
13. Tulloch J.F., Proffit W.R., and Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004) 657-667
14. Dolce C., Schader R.E., McGorray S.P., and Wheeler T.T. Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 195-200
15. O'Brien K., Wright J., Conboy F., Chadwick S., Connolly I., Cook P., et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 488-494
16. O'Brien K., Wright J., Conboy F., Sanjie Y., Mandall N., Chadwick S., et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 128-137
17. Sandusky Jr. W.C. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Kloehn type of cervical traction used as an auxiliary with the edgewise mechanism following Tweed's principles for correction of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 51 (1965) 262-287
18. Melsen B. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 73 (1978) 526-540
19. Knight H. The effects of three methods of orthodontic appliance therapy on some commonly used cephalometric angular variables. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93 (1988) 237-244
20. Ghafari J., King G.J., and Tulloch J.F. Early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion-comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998) 107-117