Orthodontists' perceptions of the impact of phase 1 treatment for class II malocclusion on phase 2 needs

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 78, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1745-1753

  King, G J ^a   Wheeler, T T ^b   McGorray, S P ^c   Aiosa, L S ^d   Bloom, R M ^e   Taylor, M G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c Private Practice ^*  (United States)

^d Private Practice   (United States)

^e Private Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

Class II malocclusion; Treatment difficulty; Treatment need; Treatment priority

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033278173     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780111201     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, Maxwell R (1996). The decision to extract: part I-interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:297-309.
2. Bowden DE, Davies AP (1975). Inter- and intraexaminer variability in assessment of orthodontic treatment need. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 3:198-200.
3. Cohen L (1970). Social psychological factors associated with malocclusion. Int Dent J 20:643-653.
4. Dugoni SA, Lee JS (1995). Mixed dentition case report. Am ] Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:239-244.
5. Espeland LV, Gronland G, Stenvik A (1993). Concern for dental appearance among Norwegian young adults in regions with low uptake of orthodontic treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21:151-157.
6. Foster TD, Walpole-Day AJ (1974). A survey of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in a Shropshire school population. Br J Orthod 1:73-78.
7. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL (1998). Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 113:51-61.
8. Han UK, Vig KW, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ(1991). Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 100:212-219.
9. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Barlebo J, Casperson I, Eriksen JH, Hansen W, et al. (1975). Estimates of orthodontic treatment need in Danish schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 3:136-142.
10. Horowitz H (1970). A study of occlusal relations in 10-12 year old Caucasian and Negro children - summary report. Int Dent J 20:593-605.
11. Jacobs RM (1988). Ten-year study of strategies for teaching clinical inference in predoctoral orthodontic education. J Dent Educ 52:235-244.
12. Jacobson A (1979). Psychology and early orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 76:511-529.
13. Jenny J (1975). A social perspective on need and demand for orthodontic treatment. Int Dent J 25:248-256.
14. Keeling SD, King GJ, Wheeler TT, McGorray S (1995). Timing of Class II treatment: rationale, methods, and early results of a randomized clinical trial. In: Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome and Effectiveness. McNamara JA, editor. Monograph 30, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, pp. 81-112.
15. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. (1998). Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 113:40-50.
16. Kreit LH, Burstone C, Dilman L (1968). Patient cooperation in orthodontic treatment. J Am Coll Dent 35:327-332.
17. Lewis HG, Brown WA (1973). The attitude of patients to the wearing of removable orthodontic appliances. Br Dent J 134:87-90.
18. Pietila T, Pietila I, Vaataja P (1992). Early screening for orthodontic treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20:208-213.
19. Proffit WR (1994). Forty year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 64:407-413.
20. Richmond S, O'Brien KD, Roberts CT, Andrews M (1994). Dentists variation on the determination of orthodontic treatment need. Br J Orthod 21:65-68.
21. Southard KA, Tolley EA, Arheart KL, Hackett-Renner CA, Southard TE (1991). Application of the Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory in evaluating orthodontic compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 100:553-561.
22. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR (1997). The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 111:391-400.
23. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Proffit WR (1998). Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 113:62-72.
24. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ (1994). Factors associated with subjective need for orthodontic treatment among Finnish university applicants. Acta Odontol Scand 52:106-110.
25. Vargervik K, Harvold EP (1985). Response to activator treatment in class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 88:242-251.
26. Wagers LE (1976). Pre-orthodontic guidance and the corrective mixed dentition treatment concept. Am J Orthod 69:1-29.
27. Wieslander L (1975). Early and late cervical traction therapy of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 67:372-406.