Evaluating CAM education in health professions programs

Academic Medicine

Volumn 82, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 956-961

  Stratton, Terry D ^a   Benn, Rita K ^b   Lie, Désirée A ^c   Zeller, Janice M ^d   Nedrow, Anne R ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ATTITUDE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 34748836994     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814a5152     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280:1569-1575.
2. Wootton JC, Sparber A. Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7:195-208.
3. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279:1548-1553.
4. Palinkas LA, Kabongo ML; San Diego Unified Practice Research in Family Medicine Network. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by primary care patients. A SURF*NET study. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:1121-1130.
5. Rafferty AP, McGee HB, Miller CE, Reyes M. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use: state-specific estimates from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1598-1600.
6. Frenkel M, Ben-Ayre E. The growing need to teach about complementary and alternative medicine: questions and challenges. Acad Med. 2001;76:251-254.
7. Brokaw JJ, Tunnicliff G, Raess BU, Saxon DW. The teaching of complementary and alternative medicine in U.S. medical schools: a survey of course directors. Acad Med. 2002;77:876-881.
8. Wetzel MS, Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ. Courses involving complementary and alternative medicine at U.S. medical schools. JAMA. 1998;280:784-787.
9. Murdoch-Eaton D, Crombie H. Complementary and alternative medicine in the undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach. 2002;24:100-102.
10. Chaterji R, Tractenberg RE, Amri H, et al. A large-sample survey of first- and second-year medical student attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine in the curriculum and in practice. Altern Ther Health Med. 2007;13:30-35.
11. Wartman S, Davis A, Wilson M, Kahn N, Sherwood R, Norwalk A. Curricular change: recommendations from a national perspective. Acad Med. 2001;76 (4 suppl):S140-S145.
12. Cohen JJ. Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability. Med Educ. 2006;40:607-617.
13. Gruppen LD, White C, Fitzgerald JT, Grum CM, Woolliscroft JO. Medical students' self-assessments and their allocations of learning time. Acad Med. 2000;75:374-379.
14. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin; 1963.
15. Stufflebeam DL, Webster WJ. An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1980;2:5-20.
16. Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 4th ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1989.
17. Thompson B, Vacha-Haase T. Psychometrics is datametrics: the test is not reliable. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:174-195.
18. Hsieh PH, Acee T, Chung WH, et al. Is educational intervention research on the decline? J Educ Psychol. 2005;97:523-529.
19. Pathman DE. Medical education and physicians' career choices: are we taking credit beyond our due? Acad Med. 1996;71:963-968.
20. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15:270-292.
21. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
22. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
23. Schneider CD, Meek PM, Bell IR. Development and validation of IMAQ: Integrative Medicine Attitude Questionnaire. BMC Med Educ. 2003;3:5.
24. Lie D, Boker J. Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitude among medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:2.
25. Gruppen L, Benn R, White C, Fantone J, Smith K, Warber S. Psychometric characteristics of an attitude instrument for complementary and alternative medicine. Paper presented at: Research in Medical Education (RIME) conference; November 2003; Washington, DC.
26. Frye AW, Sierpina VS, Boisaubin EV, Bulik RJ. Measuring what medical students think about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): a pilot study of the complementary and alternative medicine survey. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11:19-32.
27. Nedrow AR, Istvan J, Haas M, et al. Implications for education in complementary and alternative medicine: a survey of entry attitudes in students at five health professional schools. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13:381-386.
28. Kligler B, Maizes V, Schachter S, et al. Core competencies in integrative medicine for medical school curricula: a proposal. Acad Med. 2004;79:521-531.
29. Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Strodel WE. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg. 1995;222:735-742.
30. Lie DA, Boker J. Comparative survey of complementary and alternative (CAM) attitudes, use, and information-seeking behavior among medical students, residents, and faculty. BMJ Med Educ. 2006;6:58.
31. Stratton TD, McGivern JL, Dassow PL, Elder WG Jr. The perceived efficacy and evidence-base of a complementary/alternative treatment modality in an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE). Paper presented at: Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Research in Medical Education (RIME) conference; October-November 2006; Seattle, Wash.
32. Robinson DH, Levin JR, Thomas GD, Pituch KA, Vaughn S. The incidence of "causal" statements in teaching-and-learning research journals. Am Educ Res J. 2007;44:400-413.
33. Lynch DC, Whitley TW, Willis SE. A rationale for using synthetic designs in medical education research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2000;5:93-103.
34. Newman M. Fitness for purpose evaluation in problem based learning should consider the requirements for establishing descriptive causation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11:391-402.