Bimodal dialysis: Theoretical and computational investigations of adequacy indices for combined use of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 566-575

  Debowska, Malgorzata ^a   Waniewski, Jacek ^a,b   Lindholm, Bengt ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Poland)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLOOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODIALYZERS; PATIENT TREATMENT; UREA;

BIMODAL DIALYSIS; DIALYSIS ADEQUACY INDICES; DIALYSIS SESSION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (PD);

DIALYSIS;

UREA;

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODIALYSIS; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMOFILTRATION; HUMANS; KINETICS; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; RENAL DIALYSIS; UREA;

EID: 34648851378     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31810c06d2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kawanishi H, Moriishi M, Katsutani S, Sakikubo E, Tsuchiya S: Hemodialysis together with peritoneal dialysis is one of the simplest ways to maintain adequacy in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 15: 127-131, 1999.
2. Hashimoto Y, Matsubara T: Combined peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis therapy improves quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients. Adv Perit Dial 16: 108-112, 2000.
3. Kawanishi H, Moriishi M, Tsuchiya S: Five years' experience of combination therapy: peritoneal dialysis with hemodialysis. Adv Perit Dial 18: 62-67, 2002.
4. Agarwal M, Clinard P, Burkart JM: Combined peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: our experience compared to others. Perit Dial Int 23: 157-161, 2003.
5. McIntyre CW: Bimodal dialysis: an integrated approach to renal replacement therapy. Perit Dial Int 24: 547-553, 2004.
6. Burkart J: If you can't beat them, join them (bimodal dialysis: the best of both worlds). Perit Dial Int 24: 504-505, 2004.
7. Lysaght MJ, Moran JE, Schindhelm K, Hayes JM, Farrell PC: Mixed-mode therapy: kinetic analysis and acute clinical evaluation. Blood Purif 7: 332-344, 1989.
8. Henderson LW: Critical interpretation of adequacy parameters in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 19: S38-44, 1999.
9. Waniewski J, Lindholm B: Fractional solute removal and KT/V in different modalities of renal replacement therapy. Blood Purif 22: 367-376, 2004.
10. Waniewski J, Debowska M, Lindholm B: Theoretical and numerical analysis of different adequacy indices for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Blood Purification 24: 355-366, 2006.
11. Casino FG, Lopez T: The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11: 1574-1581, 1996.
12. Verrina E, Brendolan A, Gusmano R, Ronco C: Chronic renal replacement therapy in children: which index is best for adequacy? Kidney Int 54: 1690-1696, 1998.
13. Casino FG, Marshall MR: Simple and accurate quantification of dialysis in acute renal failure patients during either urea non-steady state or treatment with irregular or continuous schedules. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 1454-1466, 2004.
14. Gotch FA: The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13 Suppl 6: 10-14, 1998.
15. Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Keen ML: Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int Suppl 76: S3-18, 2000.
16. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Lysaght MJ, McCarthy JT, Moran J: Kinetics and dosing predictions for daily haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18: 769-776, 2003.
17. Clark WR, Leypoldt JK, Henderson LW, Mueller BA, Scott MK, Vonesh EF: Quantifying the effect of changes in the hemodialysis prescription on effective solute removal with a mathematical model. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 601-609, 1999.
18. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL: Predicting treatment dose for novel therapies using urea standard Kt/V. Semin Dial 17: 142-145, 2004.
19. Schneditz D, Daugirdas JT: Compartment effects in hemodialysis. Semin Dial 14: 271-277, 2001.
20. Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC: The peak concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 9: 257-260, 1989.
21. Levine J, Bernard DB: The role of urea kinetic modeling, TACurea, and Kt/V in achieving optimal dialysis: a critical reappraisal. Am J Kidney Dis 15: 285-301, 1990.
22. Shinaberger JH: Quantification of dialysis: historical perspective. Semin Dial 14: 238-245, 2001.
23. Gotch FA, Sargent JA: A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 28: 526-534, 1985.
24. Debowska M, Waniewski J, Lindholm B: An integrative description of dialysis adequacy indices for different treatment modalities and schedules of dialysis. Artif Organs 31: 61-69, 2007.
25. Gotch FA: Kt/V is the best dialysis dose parameter. Blood Purif 18: 276-285, 2000.
26. Lowrie EG: The normalized treatment ratio (Kt/V) is not the best dialysis dose parameter. Blood Purif 18: 286-294, 2000.
27. Waniewski J, Heimburger O, Werynski A, Lindholm B: Simple models for fluid transport during peritoneal dialysis. Int J Artif Organs 19: 455-466, 1996.