An integrative description of dialysis adequacy indices for different treatment modalities and schedules of dialysis

Artificial Organs

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-69

  Debowska, Malgorzata ^a   Waniewski, Jacek ^a,b   Lindholm, Bengt ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Poland)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dialysis adequacy; Hemodialysis; KT V; Peritoneal dialysis; Urea kinetic model

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; HEMODIALYZERS; KINETIC PARAMETERS; KINETIC THEORY; METABOLISM; PATIENT TREATMENT; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; UREA;

ADEQUACY INDEX; ANALYTICAL FORMULAS; DIALYSIS ADEQUACY; DIALYSIS FLUIDS; DIFFERENT TREATMENTS; HAEMODIALYSIS; KT/V; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; TREATMENT MODALITY; UREA KINETIC MODELING;

DIALYSIS;

DIALYSIS FLUID; UREA; WATER;

ANURIA; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; DIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SIMULATION;

EID: 33845770245     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00341.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Daugirdas JT, Blake G, Ing TS. Handbook of Dialysis. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
2. Waniewski J, Lindholm B. Fractional solute removal and KT/V in different modalities of renal replacement therapy. Blood Purif 2004;22:367-76.
3. Waniewski J, Debowska M, Lindholm B. Theoretical and numerical analysis of different adequacy indices for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Blood Purif 2006;24:355-66.
4. Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Keen ML. Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int Suppl 2000;76:S3-18.
5. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2010-9.
6. Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1205-13.
7. Verrina E, Brendolan A, Gusmano R, Ronco C. Chronic renal replacement therapy in children: which index is best for adequacy? Kidney Int 1998;54:1690-6.
8. Henderson LW. Critical interpretation of adequacy parameters in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1999;19(Suppl. 2):S38-44.
9. Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:1574-81.
10. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, et al. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:1307-20.
11. Schneditz D, Daugirdas JT. Compartment effects in hemodialysis. Semin Dial 2001;14:271-7.
12. Ziolko M, Pietrzyk JA, Grabska-Chrzastowska J. Accuracy of hemodialysis modeling. Kidney Int 2000;57:1152-63.
13. Clark WR, Leypoldt JK, Henderson LW, Mueller BA, Scott MK, Vonesh EF. Quantifying the effect of changes in the hemodialysis prescription on effective solute removal with a mathematical model. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:601-9.
14. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Lysaght MJ, McCarthy JT, Moran J. Kinetics and dosing predictions for daily haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:769-76.
15. Casino FG, Marshall MR. Simple and accurate quantification of dialysis in acute renal failure patients during either urea non-steady state or treatment with irregular or continuous schedules. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:1454-66.
16. Casino FG. The EKRc graph: a simple method to estimate the time-averaged urea clearance. Semin Dial 1999;12:11-4.