Theoretical and numerical analysis of different adequacy indices for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Blood Purification

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 355-366

  Waniewski, Jacek ^a,b   Debowska, Malgorzata ^a   Lindholm, Bengt ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Poland)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dialysis adequacy; Hemodialysis; Mathematical model; Peritoneal dialysis; Urea kinetic model

Indexed keywords

UREA;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; BODY REGIONS; CHRONOLOGY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; HEMODIALYSIS; KIDNEY ADENOMA; KINETICS; MASS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SOLUTE; STANDARD; THEORETICAL STUDY; TREATMENT DURATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMOFILTRATION; HUMANS; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; RENAL DIALYSIS; UREA;

EID: 33747043536     PISSN: 02535068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000093199     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Waniewski J, Lindholm B: Fractional solute removal and KT/V in different modalities of renal replacement therapy. Blood Purif 2004;22:367-376.
2. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Kusek JW, Allon M, Bailey J, Delmez JA, Depner TA, Dwyer JT, Levey AS, Levin NW, Milford E, Ornt DB, Rocco MV, Schulman G, Schwab SJ, Teehan BP, Toto R: Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2010-2019.
3. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Correa-Rotter R, Ramos A, Moran J, Mujais S: Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:1307-1320.
4. Verrina E, Brendolan A, Gusmano R, Ronco C: Chronic renal replacement therapy in children: Which index is best for adequacy? Kidney Int 1998;54:1690-1696.
5. Henderson LW: Critical interpretation of adequacy parameters in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1999;19(suppl 2):S38-S44.
6. Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Keen ML: Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int Suppl 2000;76:S3-S18.
7. Casino FG, Lopez T: The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:1574-1581.
8. Casino FG: The EKRc graph: a simple method to estimate the time-averaged urea clearance. Semin Dial 1999;12:11-14.
9. Casino FG, Marshall MR: Simple and accurate quantification of dialysis in acute renal failure patients during either urea non-steady state or treatment with irregular or continuous schedules. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:1454-1466.
10. Depner TA: Benefits of more frequent dialysis: lower TAC at the same Kt/V. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13(suppl 6):20-24.
11. Daugirdas JT, Blake G, Ing TS: Handbook of Dialysis. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
12. Gotch FA: The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13(suppl 6):10-14.
13. Schneditz D, Daugirdas JT: Compartment effects in hemodialysis. Semin Dial 2001;14:271-277.
14. Daugirdas JT: Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1205-1213.
15. Ziolko M, Pietrzyk JA, Grabska-Chrzastowska J: Accuracy of hemodialysis modeling. Kidney Int 2000;57:1152-1163.
16. Depner TA, Bhat A: Quantifying daily hemodialysis. Semin Dial 2004;17:79-84.
17. Depner TA, Kesheviah PR, Essen JP, Emerson PP, Collins AJ, Lindal KK, Nissenson AR, Lazarus JM, Pij K: Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:464-471.
18. Waniewski J, Heimburger O, Werynski A, Lindholm B: Simple models for fluid transport during peritoneal dialysis. Int J Artif Organs 1996;19:455-466.