Supporting interface customization using a mixed-initiative approach

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 92-101

  Bunt, Andrea ^a   Conati, Cristina ^a,b   McGrenere, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adaptable; Adaptive; GOMS analysis; Mixed initiative

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

GOMS ANALYSIS; INTERFACE CUSTOMIZATION; MIXED INITIATIVE FRAMEWORK; USER PRODUCTIVITY APPLICATION;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 34648823336     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1216295.1216317     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bunt, A., Conati, C., and McGrenere, J. What Role Can Adaptive Support Play in an Adaptable System? In Proc. of IUI, 2004, pp. 117-124.
2. Carberry, S. Techniques for plan recognition. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 1-2 (2001), 31-48.
3. Card, S. K., Newell, A., and Moran, T. P. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ 1983.
4. Cohen, J. Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in communication science. Human Communication Research, 28, (1973), 473-490.
5. Cypher, A. EAGER: Programming Repetitive Tasks by Example. In Proc. of CHI, 1991, pp. 33-39.
6. Czarkowski, M. and Kay, J. How to Give the User a Sense of Control Over the Personalization of Adaptive Hypertext? In Proc. of Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (in conjunction with UM'03), 2003, pp. 121-131.
7. Debevc, M., Meyer, B., Donlagic, D., and Svecko, R. Design and evaluation of an adaptive icon toolbar. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6, 1 (1996), 1-21.
8. Findlater, L. and McGrenere, J. A Comparison of Static, Adaptive, and Adaptable Menus. In Proc. of CHI, 2004, pp. 89-96.
9. Gajos, K., Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., and Weld, D. S. Exploring the Design Space for Adaptive Graphical User Interfaces. In Proc of AVI, 2006, pp. 201-208.
10. Gajos, K., D. Christianson, R. Hoffmann, T. Shaked, Henning, K., Long, J. J., and Weld, D. S. Fast and Robust Interface Generation for Ubiquitous Applications. In Proc. of Ubicomp, 2005, pp. 37-55.
11. Gong, R. and Kieras, D. A Validation of the GOMS Model Methodology in the Development of a Specialized, Commercial Software Application. In Proc. of CHI, 1994, pp. 351-357.
12. Greenberg, S. and Witten, I. H. Adaptive personalized interfaces - a question of viability. Behaviour and Information Technology, 4, 1 (1985), 31-45.
13. Greenberg, S. and Witten, I. H. How Users Repeat Their Actions on Computers: Principles for Design of History Mechanisms. In Proc. of CHI, 1988, pp. 171-178.
14. Hook, K. Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Interacting with Computers, 12, (2000), 409-426.
15. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. In Proc. of CHI, 1999, pp. 159-166.
16. Horvitz, E., Herckerman, D., Hovel, D., and Rommelse, R. The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users. In Proc. of UAI, 1998, pp. 256-265.
17. Jameson, A. and Schwarzkopf, E. Pros and Cons of Controllability: An Empirical Study. In Proc. of AH, 2002, pp. 193-202.
18. Kieras, D. E., Wood, S. D., Abotel, K., and Hornof, A. J. GLEAN: A Computer-Based Tool for Rapid GOMS Model Usability Evaluation of User Interface Designs. In Proc. of UIST, 1995, pp. 91-100.
19. Linton, F. and Schaefer, H. Recommender systems for learning: building user and expert models through long-term observation of application use. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 10, 2-3 (2000), 181-207.
20. Mackay, W. E. Triggers and Barriers to Customizing Software. In Proc. of CHI, 1991, pp. 153-160.
21. McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., and Booth, K. S. An Evaluation of a Multiple Interface Design Solution for Bloated Software. In Proc. of CHI, 2002, pp. 163-170.
22. McGrenere, J. and Moore, G. Are We AU in the Same "Bloat"? In Proc. of GI, 2000, pp. 187-196.
23. Mitchell, J. and Shneiderman, B. Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bull., 20, 4 (1989), 33-37.
24. Oppermann, R. Adaptively supported adaptability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, (1994), 455472.
25. Shneiderman, B. and Maes, P. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents, interactions, 4, 6 (1997), 42-61.
26. St. Amant, R. and Cohen, P. R. Interaction with a Mixed-Initiative System for Exploratory Data Analysis. In Proc. of IUI, 1997, pp. 15-22.
27. Thomas, C G. and Krogsoeter, M. An Adaptive Environment for the User Interface of Excel. In Proc. of IUI, 1993, pp. 123-130.