Identifying growth indicators for low-achieving students in middle school mathematics

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 4-16

  Foegen, Anne ^a   Deno, Stanley L ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035532377     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246690103500102     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baxter, G. P., Shavelson, R. J., Herman, S. J., Brown, K. A., & Valadez, J. R. (1993). Mathematics performance assessment: Technical quality and diverse student impact. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 190-216.
2. Cain, R. W., & Kenney, P. A. (1992). A joint vision for classroom assessment. Mathematics Teacher, 85, 612-615.
3. Carnine, D. (1992). Expanding the notion of teachers' rights: Access to tools that work. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 13-19.
4. Clarke, D. J. (1992). Activating assessment alternatives in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(6), 24-29.
5. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1986). California Achievement Tests: Forms E and F: Technical Bulletin 2. Monterey, CA: Author.
6. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
7. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., & Marston, D. (1997). Alternative measures for predicting student performance on graduation standards. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Research Conference, La Jolla, CA.
8. Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368-371.
9. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
10. Discourse [Computer groupware]. (1990). Milwaukee, WI: Discourse Technologies.
11. Espin, C. A. (1990). Reading aloud from text as an indicator of achievement in the content areas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
12. Espin, C. A., & Deno, S. L. (1993). Performance in reading from content area text as an indicator of achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 14(6), 47-59.
13. Espin, C. A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of GOMs for predicting secondary students' performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497-514.
14. Espin, C. A., & Tindal, G. (1998). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 214-273). New York: Guilford.
15. Foegen, A., & Hargrave, C. P. (1997). Discourse: Groupware for interactive classroom communication [Review of the computer groupware Discourse]. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(2), 30-32.
16. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-500.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic skills for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 8(3), 135-149.
18. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1996). Combining performance assessment and curriculum-based measurement to strengthen instructional planning. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 183-192.
19. Fuchs, L. S. Fuchs, D., Eaton, S., & Karns, K. (1999, April). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: Teacher judgment vs. data-based decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
20. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1989). The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 14(4), 203-221.
21. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a leading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-450.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
23. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Thompson, A., Roberts, P. H., Kubek, P., & Stecker, P. M. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system (1994). Diagnostique, 19(4), 23-49.
24. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math computational manual (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25. Fuchs, L. S., Karns, K. M., Eaton, S. B., & Hamlett, C. L. (1999, April). Identifying fair, appropriate testing accommodations for students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Charlotte, NC.
26. Gagne, R. M. (1983). Some issues in the psychology of mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 7-18.
27. Glaser, R. (1987). The integration of instruction and testing: Implications from the study of human cognition. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 329-341). New York: Random House.
28. Goals 2000: Educate America Act, 20 U.S.C. § 5801 et seq.
29. Hartocollis, A. (2000, April 27). The new flexible math meets parental rebellion [41 paragraphs]. The New York Times on the Web [On-line.], Available: http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/regional/042700ny-math-edu.html
30. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(6), 1-7.
31. Hoff, D. J. (1998, January 21). Controversial Goals 2000 to face new uncertainties. Education Week [On-line]. Availabie: http://www.edweek.org/ htbin/fastweb?searchform+view4
32. Hofmeister, A. M. (1993). Elitism and reform in school mathematics, Remedial and Special Education, 14(6), 8-13.
33. Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
34. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 199-203.
35. Kulm, G. (1994). Mathematics assessment: What works in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
37. Lawton, M. (1997, August 6). Feds position national tests on fast track. Education Week, pp. 1, 34.
38. Lesh, R., & Lamon, S. J. (1992). Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
39. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
40. Math wars. (2000, January 4). Wall Street Journal, p. A22.
41. Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
42. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. Nolet, V., & Tindal, G. (1994). Instruction and learning in middle school science classes: Implications for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 166-187.
46. Resnick, L. B. (1989). Developing mathematical knowledge. American Psychologist, 44, 162-169.
47. Reys, B. (1992). Estimation. In T. R. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (pp. 279-301). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48. Reys, R. E. (1986). Evaluating computational estimation. Estimation and mental computation, 1986 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 225-238). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
49. Reys, R. E., Rybolt, J. F., Bestgen, B. J., & Wyatt, J. W. (1982). Processes used by good computational estimators. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 183-201.
50. Robinson, S. L. (1991). Computer-based instruction in special education. In T. M. Schlecter (Ed.), Problems and promises of computer-based training (pp. 39-60). Norwood, NJ: Ables.
51. Robinson, S. L. (1994). Classroom technology for the human touch: A mini case study using DISCOURSE™. Curriculum/Technology Quarterly, 4(1), 1-4.
52. Robinson, S. L., & Deno, S. L. (1992, November). Computer-enhanced inclusion: A model for computer-based instructional management in mainstream classrooms. Grant proposal submitted to the U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.
53. Romberg, T. A. (1992). Mathematics assessment and evaluation: Imperatives Press.
54. Sack, J. L. (1998, April 15). Competition heats up for federal education dollars. Education Week [On-line]. Available: http://www.edweek.org/htbin/ fastweb?searchform+view4