|
Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 168-173
|
The right not to know and coronary angiography: is the common law of Australia consistent with patients' wishes?
a
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY;
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT PARTICIPATION;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
AGED;
AUSTRALIA;
CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY;
DISCLOSURE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT PARTICIPATION;
PATIENT RIGHTS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
|
EID: 0036833595
PISSN: 1320159X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|