People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 373-389

  Vrij, Aldert ^a   Edward, Katherine ^b   Bull, Ray ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; RECUMBENCY; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; DECEPTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; GESTURES; HUMANS; MALE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 0035349025     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712601162248     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461-473.
2. Akehurst, L., & Vrij, A. (1999). Creating suspects in police interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 192-210.
3. Anson, D. A., Golding, S. L., & Gully, K. J. (1993). Child sexual abuse allegations: Reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 331-341.
4. Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (1991). Research designs and methods. London: Mayfield.
5. DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. L., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346-357.
6. DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
7. DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.
9. DePaulo, B. M., Lanier, K., & Davis, T. (1983). Detecting deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096-1103.
10. DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Telling lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1713-1722.
11. DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, & Green, C. R. (1982). Actual and perceived cues to deception: A closer look at speech. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 291-312.
12. DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. L., & Lassiter, g. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schenkler (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323-370). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton.
14. Ekman, P. (1993). Why don't we catch liars? Social Research, 63, 801-817.
15. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-97.
16. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288-298.
17. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125-135.
18. Exline, R., Thibaut, J., Hickey, C., & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to machiavellianism and an unethical act. In P. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in machiavellianism (pp. 53-75). New York: Academic Press.
19. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
20. Greuel, L. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In F. Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 234-239). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
21. Honts, C. R. (1994). Assessing children's credibility: Scientific and legal issues in 1994. North Dakota Law Review, 70, 879-903.
22. Horowitz, S. W., Lamb, M. E., Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, T. D., Krispin, O., & Reiter-Lavery, L. (1997). Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 11-21.
23. Köhnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Höfer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adult's statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684.
24. Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380-391.
25. Landry, K., & Brigham, J. C. (1992). The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-675.
26. Miller, A. G., Ashton, W., & Mishal, M. (1990). Beliefs concerning the features of constrained behavior: A basis for the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 635-650.
27. Miller, A. G., Jones, E. E., & Hinkle, S. (1981). A robust attribution error in the personality domain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 587-600.
28. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-459.
29. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
30. Ross, L., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
31. Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1998). Can Criteria-Based Content Analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African-American speakers? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 369-388.
32. Spitznagel, E. L., & Heltzer, J. E. (1985). A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the Kappa statistic. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 725-728.
33. Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.
34. Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 135-154). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
35. Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Taylor, R., & Vrij, A. (2000). The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on beliefs about the cues to deception. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 3, 111-124.
37. Tully, B. (1998). Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements: Cohen's kappa doesn't matter. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 183-188.
38. Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der Glabhaftigkeit von Aussagen. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie Vol. 11: Forensische Psychologie (pp. 26-181). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
39. Vrij, A. (1991). Misverstanden tussen politie en allochtonen: Sociaal-psychologische aspecten van verdacht zijn. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
40. Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117-137.
41. Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 129, 15-29.
42. Vrij, A. (2000). Telling lies and detecting deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chicester: Wiley.
43. Vrij, A., & Akehurst, L. (1998). Verbal communication and credibility: Statement validity assessment. In A. Memon, A. Vrij, & R. Bull (Eds.), Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (pp. 3-31). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
44. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Morris, P. M. (1997). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 87-102.
45. Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law, 5, 144-148.
46. Vrij, A., Kneller, W., & Mann, S. (2000). The effect of informing liars about Criteria-Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 57-70.
47. Vrij, A., Semin, G. R., & Bull, R. (1996). Insight in behavior displayed during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544-562.
48. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F. W. (1991). Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam nonverbal behavior: An analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 169-184.
49. Vrij, A., Winkel, F. W., & Akehurst, L. (1997). Police officers' incorrect beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception and its consequences. In J. F. Nijboer & J. M. Reijntjes (Eds.), Proceedings of the first world conference on new trends in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 221-238). Lelystad, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Vermande.
50. Winkel, F. W., & Vrij, A. (1995). Verklaringen van kinderen in interviews: Een experimenreel onderzoek naar de diagnostische waarde van Criteria Based Content Analysis. Tijdschrift voor Ontwikkelingspsychologie, 22, 61-74.
51. Zaparniuk, J., Yuille, J. C., & Taylor, S. (1995). Assessing the credibility of true and false statements. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18, 343-352.
52. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 14, pp. 1-57). New York: Academic Press.