Beliefs about the cues to deception in high- and low-stake situations

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 357-368

  Lakhani, Mital ^a   Taylor, Rachel ^b  

^a Mergers and Acquisitions Group   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Believed Cues; Deception; Stakes

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344253900     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1068316031000093441     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A. and Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 461-471.
2. Anderson, D. E., de Paulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J. and Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 23, 67-89.
3. Anolli, L. and Ciceri, R. (1997). The voice of deception: vocal strategies of naïve and able liars. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 21, 259-284.
4. Bond, C. F., Omar, A., Pitre, U., Lashley, B. R., Skaggs, L. M. and Kirk, C. T. (1992). Fishy-looking liars: deception judgement from expectancy violation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 969-977.
5. Brewer, W. F. and Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
6. Christianson, S. A. and Hubinette, B. (1993). Hands Up! A study of witnesses' emotional reactions and memories associated with bank robberies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 365-379.
7. Cody, M. J., Marston, P. J., and Foster, M. (1984). Deception: paralinguistic and verbal leakage. In R. N. Bostrom and B. H. Westley (Eds), Communication Yearbook 8 (pp. 464-490). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. de Paulo, B. M., and Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed), Credibility Assessment (pp. 51-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
9. de Paulo, B. M., Lanier, K. and Davis, T. (1983). Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096-1103.
10. de Paulo, B. M., Stone, J. I. and Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed) The Self and Social Life (pp. 323-370). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. de Paulo, B. M., and Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
12. de Paulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J. and O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 12, 177-202.
13. Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and non-verbal behaviour: theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 12, 163-176.
14. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage, 2nd edn.. New York: Norton.
15. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body and face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288-298.
16. Fiedler, K. and Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use non-verbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.
17. Frank, M. G. and Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalises across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429-1439.
18. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. New York: Doubleday.
19. Gordon, R. A., Baxter, J. C., Rozelle, R. M. and Druckman, D. (1987). Expectations of honest, evasive and deceptive non-verbal behaviour. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 213-233.
20. Hick, R. F. and Taylor, R. (in preparation). Prison officers and students beliefs about detecting little and serious lies.
21. Köhnken, G. (1989) Behavioural correlates of statement credibility. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel and J. Haisch (Eds), Criminal Behaviour and the Justice System: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 271-289). New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Porter, S. and Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: an investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behaviour, 20, 443-459.
23. Taylor, R. and Vrij, A. (2000). The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on beliefs about the cues to deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 3, 111-123.
24. Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioural correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology, 129, 15-29.
25. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
26. Vrij, A. and Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about non-verbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 20, 65-80.
27. Vrij, A., Semin, G. R. and Bull, R. (1996). Insight into behaviour displayed during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544-562.
28. Vrij, A., and Taylor, R. (in press). Police officers' and students' beliefs about telling and detecting little and serious lies. International Journal of Police Science and Management.
29. Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R. and Driver, R. E. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 6, 105-114.