Investigation of conditions involved in the susceptibility of the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum to photodynamic treatment

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 750-759

  Smijs, Threes G M ^a   Bouwstra, Joke A ^b   Talebi, Mojgan ^a   Pavel, Stan ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ex vivo model; Microconidia; PH; Porphyrins; Stratum corneum; Surface potential; Tinea infections

Indexed keywords

5,10,15 TRIS(4 METHYLPYRIDINIUM) 20 PHENYL [21H,23H] PORPHINE TRICHLORIDE; DEUTEROPORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE; DEUTEROPORPHYRIN MONOMETHYLESTER; HISTIDINE; MANNITOL; OXYGEN; PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENT; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; SCAVENGER; SINGLET OXYGEN; SODIUM AZIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; DERMATOPHYTE; DRUG BINDING; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG STRUCTURE; EX VIVO STUDY; FUNGUS GROWTH; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IONIC STRENGTH; LIGHT; NONHUMAN; PH; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; TRICHOPHYTON RUBRUM;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; DEUTEROPORPHYRINS; FREE RADICAL SCAVENGERS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY; PORPHYRINS; PYRIDINIUM COMPOUNDS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TRICHOPHYTON;

EID: 34548801848     PISSN: 03057453     EISSN: 14602091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm304     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Marcus SL, McIntyre WR. Photodynamic therapy systems and applications. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2002; 7: 321-34.
2. Bolande RP, Wurz L. Photodynamic action. I. Mechanisms of photodynamic cytotoxicity. Arch Pathol 1963; 75: 115-22.
3. Nayak CS. Photodynamic therapy in dermatology. Ind J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005; 71: 155-60.
4. Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy targeted to pathogens. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2004; 17: 245-54.
5. Tegos GP, Hamblin MR. Phenothiazinium antimicrobial photo-sensitizers are substrates of bacterial multidrug resistance pumps. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 196-203.
6. Dubbelman TMAR, Schuitmaker JJ. Photosensitizers. In: Jain V, Goal H, eds. Selected Topics in Photobilology. New Dehli, India: Indian Photobiology Society, 1992; 95-107.
7. Takemura T, Ohta N, Nakajima S et al. The mechanism of photosensitization in photodynamic therapy: Chemiluminescence caused by photosensitization of porphyrins in saline containing human serum albumin. Photochem Photobiol 1992; 55: 137-40.
8. Ravindra K. Porphyrins as photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy. In: Kadesh KM et al., eds. The Poryphyrin Handbook volume 6. Academic Press, 2000; 157-61.
9. Xu S, Zhang X, Chen S et al. EPR studies of the photodynamic properties of a novel potential photodynamic therapeutic agent: photogeneration of semiquinone radical anion and active oxygen species (O2*-, OH* H2O2 and 1O2). Photochem Photobiol Sci 2003; 2: 871-6.
10. Calzavara-Pinton PG, Venturini M, Sala R. A comprehensive overview of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of superficial fungal infections of the skin. J Photochem Photobiol B 2005; 78: 1-6.
11. Lambrechts SA, Aalders MC, Van Marle J. Mechanistic study of the photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans by a cationic porphyrin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2026-34.
12. Donnelly RF, McCarron PA, Tunney MM et al. Potential of photodynamic therapy in treatment of fungal infections of the mouth. Design and characterisation of a mucoadhesive patch containing toluidine blue O. J Photochem Photobiol B 2006; 86: 59-69.
13. Aly R. Ecology and epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: S21-S25.
14. Djeridane A, Djeridane Y, Ammar-Khodja A. Epidemiological and aetiological study on tinea pedis and onychomycosis in Algeria. Mycoses 2006; 49: 190-6.
15. Rippon JW. The changing epidemiology and emerging patterns of dermatophyte species. Curr Top Med Mycol 1985; 1: 208-34.
16. Kuijpers AF, Tan CS. Fungi and yeasts isolated in mycological studies in skin and nail infections in The Netherlands, 1992-1993. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1996; 140: 1022-5.
17. Omero C, Dror Y, Freeman A. Trichoderma spp. antagonism to the dermalophyte Trichophyton rubrum: Implications in treatment of onychomycosis. Mycopathalogia 2004; 158:173-80.
18. Vera JR, Cervera, LA. Advantages and disadvantages of topical antifungal agents. Rev Esp Quimioter 2001; 14: 232-7.
19. Smijs TG, Schuitmaker HJ. Photodynamic inactivation of the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum. Photochem Photobiol 2003; 77: 556-60.
20. Smijs TG, van der Haas RN, Lugtenburg J et al. Photodynamic treatment of the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum and its microconidia with porphyrin photosensitizers. Photochem Photobiol 2004; 80: 197-202.
21. Smijs TG, Bouwstra JA, Schuitmaker HJ et al. A novel ex vivo skin model to study the susceptibility of the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum to photodynamic treatment in different growth phases. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 59: 433-40.
22. Jigami Y, Odani T. Mannosylphosphate transfer to yeast mannan. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1426: 335-45.
23. Zhang SP, Zhao JQ, Jiang LJ. Photosensitized formation of singlet oxygen by phycobiliproteins in neutral aqueous solutions. Free Radic Res 2000; 33: 489-96.
24. Bektasoglu B, Esin CS, Ozyurek M et al. Novel hydroxyl radical scavenging antioxidant activity assay for water-soluble antioxidants using a modified CUPRAC method. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 345: 1194-200.
25. Meevootisom V, Niederpruem DJ. Control of exocellular proteases in dermatophytes and especially Trichophyton rubrum. Sabouraudia 1979; 17: 91-106.
26. Raubitschek F. Mechanical versus chemical keratolysis by dermatophytes. Sabouraudia 1961; 1: 87-90.
27. Apodaca G, McKerrow JH. Regulation of Trichophyton rubrum proteolytic activity, Infect Immun 1989; 57: 3081-90.
28. Zurita J, Hay RJ. Adherence of dermatophyte microconidia and arthroconidia to human karatinocytes in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 1987; 89: 529-34.
29. Gunister E, Isci S, Oztekin N et al. Effect of cationic surfactant adsorption on the rheological and surface properties of bentonite dispersions. J Colloid Interface Sci 2006; 303 137-41.
30. Ahualli S, Delgado A, Miklavcic SJ et al. Dynamic electrophoretic mobility of concentrated dispersions ol spherical colloidal particles. On the consistent use of the call model. Langmuir 2006; 22: 7041-51.
31. Bisby RH, Morgan CG. Quenching singlet oxygen by trolox C, ascorbate, and amino acids: Effects of pH and temperature. J Phys Chem A 1999; 103: 7454-9.
32. Marro D, Guy RH, Delgado-Charro MB. Characterization of the iontophoretic permselectivity properties of human and pig skin. J Control Release 2001; 70: 213-7.
33. Butorina DN, Krasnovskii AA, Priezzhev AV. Study of kinetic parameters of singlet molecular oxygen in aqueous porphyrin solutions. Effect of detergents and the quencher sodium azide. Biofizika 2003; 48 201-9.
34. Schmidt R. Quantitative determination of (1)Sigma(g)(+) and (1)Delta(g) singlet oxygen in solvents of very different polarity. General energy gap law for rate constants of electronic energy transfer to and from O(2) in the absence of charge-transfer interactions. J Phys Chem A Mol Spectrosc Kinet Environ Gen Theory 2006; 110: 10369.
35. Schmidt R. Photosensitized generation of singlet oxygen. Photochem Photobiol 2006; 82: 1161-77.
36. Cid VJ, Duran A, del Rey F et al. Molecular basis of cell integrity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev 1995; 59: 345-86.
37. Santos DA, Barros ME, Harridan JS. Establishing a method of inoculum preparation for susceptibility testing of Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 98-101.
38. Barkai-Golan R, Mirelman D, Sharon N. Studies on growth inhibition by lectins of Penicillia and Aspergilli. Arch Microbiol 1978; 116: 119-21.