Assessing cumulative environmental effects from major public transport projects

Transport Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 293-305

  Tricker, Reginald C ^a  

^a Transportation Planning Team ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cumulative effects; Environmental assessment; Public transport; Sustainable development; Trams; Transport appraisal

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34548794132     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Amekudzi A. Assessing extrajurisdictional and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 129 1 (2003) 27-44
2. Arts J., and Van Lamoen F.V. Before EIA: defining the scope of infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 7 1 (2005) 51-80
3. AusAID. AusGUIDE-The Logical Framework Approach (2003), Ausaid, UK
4. Bertolini L., and le Clercq F. Urban development without more mobility by car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a multimodal urban region. Environment and Planning A 35 (2003) 575-589
5. Bond A.J., and Brookes D.J. A strategic framework to determine the best practicable environmental option (BPEO) for proposed transport schemes. Journal of Environmental Management 51 (1997) 305-321
6. Cabinet Office, 2001. A Futurist's Toolbox. September, 2001. Performance and Innovation Unit, London.
7. Camden Borough Council. Unitary Development Plan (2000), Camden Borough Council
8. CEQ, 1997. Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Council on Environmental Quality, Washington DC.
9. Corporation of London. The City of London Unitary Development Plan 2002 (2002), Corporation of London
10. City of Westminster. Second Deposit UDP (2001), City of Westminster
11. Clark R. Cumulative Effects Assessment: a tool for sustainable development. Impact Assessment 12 (1994) 319-331
12. Cocklin C., Parker S., and Hay J. Notes on cumulative environmental change I: concepts and issues. Journal of Environmental Management 35 (1992) 31-49
13. Colvile R.N., et al. Sustainable development of urban transport systems and human exposure to air pollution. Science of the Total Environment 334-335 (2004) 481-487
14. Cooper, L.M., 2003. Draft guidance on cumulative effects assessment of plans. EPMG Paper 03/LMC/CEA, Imperial College London.
15. Cooper L.M., and Sheate W.R. Integrating cumulative effects assessment into UK strategic planning: implications of the European Union SEA Directive. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 22 1 (2004) 5-16
16. CRP, 2002a. London South Central Local Transport Strategy-Final Report, December 2002. Peter Brett Associates.
17. CRP, 2002b. London Tram Economic Impact Assessment-A Final Report, March 2002. DTZ Pieda Consulting.
18. CRP. The Case for Cross River Tram (2004), Cross River Partnership, London
19. CRP, 2005. Cross River Tram: Facts and Figures. Cross River Partnership website 〈http://www.crossriverpartnership.org〉, last accessed September 2005.
20. Dabinett G., et al. Transport investment and regeneration, Sheffield 1992-1997. Transport Policy 6 (1999) 123-134
21. Davies P. Policy Evaluation in the United Kingdom (2004), Cabinet Office, London
22. DEFRA, 2003. Policy Appraisal and the Environment. Policy Guidance. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
23. Delbecq A.L., et al. Group Techniques for Program Planning (1975), Scott, Foresman and Company, Illinois
24. Denant-Boemont L., and Mills G. Urban light rail: intermodal competition or coordination?. Transport Reviews 19 3 (1999) 241-253
25. DETR (1999). Framework for Assessing Studies of the Impact of Transport Infrastructure on Economic Activity. DETR, London.
26. DfT, 2003a. The Wider Economic Impacts Sub-Objective. WebTAG Unit 3.5.8, June 2003. DfT, London.
27. DfT, 2003b. The Environmental Capital Approach. WebTAG Unit 3.3.6, June 2003. DfT, London.
28. DfT, 2003c. Accumulating Environmental Impacts: GOMMMS Supplement, July 2003. WebTAG Archived Document. DfT, London.
29. DfT, 2004a. Strategic Environmental Assessment for Transport Plans and Programmes. WebTAG 2.11, December 2004. DfT, London.
30. DfT, 2005. Introduction to Transport Analysis. WebTAG Unit 1.1, June 2005. DfT, London.
31. DTLR, 2000. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Procedures. Thomas Telford, Tonbridge, Kent.
32. Eales, et al. Emerging approaches to integrated appraisal in the UK. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23 2 (2005) 113-123
33. Environment Agency (2004). Strategic Environmental Assessment Good Practice Guidelines. Environment Agency, UK.
34. ERM. Midland Metro Extensions Environmental Impact Statements (2003), Birmingham City Council
35. Filion P. Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: what difference do they make?. Environment and Planning A 33 (2001) 141-160
36. Fischer T.B., Wood C., and Jones C. Policy, plan, and programme environmental assessment in England, the Netherlands, and Germany: practice and prospects. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 2 (2002) 159-172
37. French S., and Geldermann J. The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support. Environmental Science & Policy 8 (2005) 378-391
38. Giddings B., Hopwood B., and O'Brien G. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together in sustainable development. Sustainable Development 10 (2002) 187-196
39. Girardet H. Creating Sustainable Cities (1999), Green Books, Totnes
40. GLA. The Mayor's Transport Strategy (2001), Greater London Authority, London
41. GLA. Cross River Tram: Indicative Alignment & Stop Locations (map) (2004), Greater London Authority, London
42. Glasson J., Therivel R., and Chadwick A. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment Principles and Procedures, Process, Practice and Prospects. second ed. (1999), UCL, London
43. Hegmann G., et al. Cumulative Effects Assessment Practioners Guide (1999), Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Quebec
44. Highways Agency, 1993. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, vol. 11. Environmental Assessment. Highways Agency, UK.
45. Hille J. The Concept of Environmental Space: Implications for Policies, Environmental Reporting and Assessment (1997), EEA, Copenhagen
46. Hillman M. How We Can Save the Planet (2004), Penguin, London
47. HM Treasury. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government (2003), TSO, London
48. HMSO, 2004. The Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. HMSO, London.
49. Hull, A.D., Tricker, R.C., Hills, S., 2006. Interactions between policy sectors and constraints on cross-sector working in the delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Solutions. DISTILLATE Formal Deliverable A2, July 2006. Available at: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
50. IAIA, 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment-Performance Criteria. Special Publication Series No. 1. International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, USA.
51. Lambeth Borough Council. The Lambeth Plan 2002-2017 Deposit (2002), Lambeth Borough Council
52. Lawrence D.P. Cumulative effects assessment at the project level. Impact Assessment 12 3 (1994) 253-274
53. Lenzen M. Total requirements of energy and greenhouse gases for Australian transport. Transportation Research Part D 4 (1999) 265-290
54. Linstone H.A., and Turoff M. The Delphi Method (1975), Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
55. London Transport. Ideas for Public Transport in Outer London (1995), London Transport
56. MacDonald L. Evaluating and managing cumulative effects: process and constraints. Environmental Management 26 3 (2000) 299-315
57. McQuaid, R.W., Greig, M., Smyth, A., Cooper, J., 2004. The importance of transport in business' location decisions. Report by Napier University for the Department for Transport. DfT, London.
58. Meyer M.D., and Miller E.J. Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-Oriented Approach. second ed. (2001), McGraw-Hill, New York
59. Miller G. The development of indicators for sustainable tourism: results of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers. Tourism Management 22 (2001) 351-362
60. In: Morris P., and Therivel R. (Eds). Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment (1995), UCL Press, London
61. Mulgan, G., 2005. Public value: physical capital and the potential of value maps. In: Physical Capital: How Great Places Boost Public Value. CABE, London.
62. Noland R.B. Transport planning and environmental assessment: implications of induced travel effects. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 1 1 (2007) 1-28
63. ODPM. A Practical Guide to the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive (2005), Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
64. Pope J., Annandale D., and Morrison-Saunders A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24 (2004) 595-616
65. Rees W.E. Cumulative environmental assessment and global change. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15 (1995) 295-309
66. Reid, A., 2005. Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Bill. SPICe briefing 05/21, 18 April. Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh.
67. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Transport and the Environment (1995), HMSO, London
68. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Environmental Planning. Twenty-third Report (2002), HMSO, London
69. SACTRA. Transport and the Economy: Full Report (1999), SACTRA, London
70. Southwark Borough Council. The First Draft for Deposit Unitary Development Plan (2002), Southwark Borough Council
71. Strategy Unit. London Analytical Report. July 2003 (2003), Cabinet Office, London
72. Transport for London. Cross River Transit Summary Report (2000), Transport for London
73. Transport, 2000 Trust, 2003. At the Leading Edge: A Public Transport Good Practice Guide. Jonathon Bray Associates.
74. Transport Energy, 2002. Transport and Environmental Management Systems. Good Practice Guide 318. March, 2002. Transport Energy, London.
75. Transport Studies Group, 2004. JLE Summary Report-Final Report. June, 2004. Prepared by Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster for Transport for London and the Department for Transport.
76. Transportation Research Board-National Research Council, 2002. Desk reference for estimating the indirect effects of proposed transportation projects. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 466, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
77. Tricker, R.C., 2002. Is water colour increasing in the River Tees and River Wear as a response to climate change for the period 1967-1999? University of Durham University, unpublished undergraduate dissertation.
78. Tricker, R.C., 2003. Tram Tomorrow? Using cumulative effects methodologies to evaluate the impact of London's proposed Cross River Tram on the urban environment. Imperial College, London, unpublished M.Sc. Thesis.
79. US Department of Transport, 2003. Interim Guidance: Questions and Answers Regarding Indirect and Cumulative Impact Considerations in the NEPA Process. US DOT Federal Highway Administration.