MR Imaging of Gynecologic Diseases at 3T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 403-431

  Turnbull, Lindsay ^a   Booth, Susanne ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CYSTADENOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; FIBROMA; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY CANCER; OVARY CYST; OVARY DISEASE; OVARY TERATOMA; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; VULVA TUMOR;

ARTIFACTS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; OVARIAN DISEASES; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34548782680     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.001     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Morakkabati-Spitz N., Gieske J., Kuhl C., et al. MRI of the pelvis at 3T: very high spatial resolution with sensitivity encoding and flip-angle sweep technique in clinically acceptable scan time. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 634-641
2. Kataoka M., Kido A., Koyama T., et al. MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE images. J Magn Reson Imaging 25 (2007) 527-534
3. Gabriel S., and Corhout E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues. Phys Med Biol 41 (1996) 2231-2249
4. Wang D., Heberlein K.A., LaConte S., et al. Inherent insensitivity to RF inhomogeneity in flash imaging. Magn Reson Med 52 (2004) 927-931
5. Yoo R.Y., Sirlin C.B., Gottschalk M., et al. Ovarian imaging by magnetic resonance imaging in obese adolescent girls with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 84 4 (2005) 985-995
6. Erdem C.Z., Bayar U., Erdem L.O., et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: dynamic contrast-enhanced ovarian MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 51 1 (2004) 48-53
7. Hascalik S., Celik O., Sarac K., et al. Clinical significance of N-acetyl-L-aspartate resonance in ovarian mucinous cystadenoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 1 (2006) 423-426
8. Takeuchi M., Matsuzaki K., Kusaka M., et al. Ovarian cystadenofibroma-characteristic magnetic resonance findings with pathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27 6 (2003) 871-873
9. Jung D.C., Kim S.H., and Kim S.H. MR imaging findings of ovarian cystadenofibroma and cystadenocarcinofibroma: clues for the differential diagnosis. Korean J Radiol 7 3 (2006) 199-204
10. Togashi K., Nishimura K., Kimura I., et al. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180 (1991) 73-78
11. Nishimura K., Togashi K., Itoh K., et al. Endometrial cysts of the ovary: MR imaging. Radiology 162 (1987) 315-318
12. Woodward P., Sohaey R., and Mezzetti T.P. Endometriosis: radio-pathological correlation. Radiographics 21 (2001) 193-216
13. Sugimura K., Okizuka H., Imaoka I., et al. Pelvic endometriosis: detection and diagnosis with chemical shift imaging. Radiology 188 (1993) 435-438
14. Scoutt L.M., McCarthy S.M., Lange R., et al. MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18 (1994) 609-618
15. Jacobson L., and Westrom L. Objectivized diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease: diagnostic and prognostic value of routine laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 106 (1969) 1088-1098
16. Tukeva T.A., Aronen H.J., Karjalainen P.T., et al. MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology 210 (1999) 209-216
17. Kim S.H., Kim S.H., Yang D.M., et al. Unusual causes of tubo-ovarian abscess: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 24 6 (2004) 1575-1589
18. Ghossain M.A., Hachem Y., Buy J.N., et al. Adnexal torsion: magnetic resonance findings in the viable adnexa with emphasis on stromal ovarian appearance. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 3 (2004) 451-462
19. Sohaib S.A., Mills T.D., Sahdev A., et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 60 3 (2005) 340-348
20. Qayyum A., Coakley F.V., Westphalen A.C., et al. Role of CT and MR imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction of newly diagnosed primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynaecol Oncol 96 2 (2005) 301-306
21. Forstner R., Chen M., and Hricak H. Imaging of ovarian cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 5 (1995) 606-613
22. Forstner R., Hricak H., Occhipinti K.A., et al. Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 197 (1995) 619-626
23. Forstner R., Hricak H., Powell C.B., et al. Ovarian cancer recurrence: value of MR imaging. Radiology 196 3 (1995) 715-720
24. Kalovidouris A., Gouliamos A., Pontifex G.R., et al. Computed tomography of ovarian carcinoma. Acta Radiol 25 (1984) 2003-2008
25. Sanders R.C., McNeil B.J., Finberg H.J., et al. A prospective study of computed tomography and ultrasound in the detection and staging of pelvic masses. Radiology 146 (1983) 439-442
26. Semelka R.C., Lawrence P.H., Shoemut J.P., et al. Primary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre- and post contrast fat suppressed MR imaging, with histologic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 3 (1993) 99-106
27. Shiels R.A., Peel K.R., MacDonald H.N., et al. A prospective trial of computed tomography in the staging of ovarian malignancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol 92 (1985) 407-412
28. Kurtz A., Tsimikas J.V., Tempany C.M.C., et al. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR Imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis-report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 212 (1999) 19-27
29. Tempany C.M.C., Zou K.H., Silverman K.G., et al. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities-report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 215 (2000) 761-767
30. Low R.N., Duggan B., Barone R.M., et al. Treated ovarian cancer: MR imaging, laparotomy reassessment and serum CA-125 values compared with clinical outcome at 1 year. Radiology 235 235 (2005) 918-926
31. Manfredi R., Mirk P., Maresca G., et al. Local regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 231 (2004) 372-378
32. Rockall A.G., Meroni R., Sohaib S.A., et al. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 17 1 (2007) 188-196
33. Nasi F., Fiocchi F., Pecchi A., et al. MRI evaluation of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma. Comparison between fast-spin-echo T2W and coronal FMPSPGR Gadolinium-dota-enhanced sequences. Radiol Med (Torino) 110 3 (2005) 199-210
34. Rockall A.G., Sohaib S.A., Harisinghani M.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 23 12 (2005) 2813-2821
35. Bipat S., Afina S.G., van der Velden J., et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 91 (2003) 59-66
36. Janus C.L., Mendelson D.S., Moore S., et al. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Clin Imaging 13 (1989) 114-116
37. Cobby M, Browning J, Jones A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol 63(753):673-9.
38. Sabak L.L., Hricak H., Powell C.B., et al. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 86 (1995) 43-50
39. Kaji Y., Sagimara K., Kitao M., et al. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18 (1994) 783-792
40. Sahdev A, Sohaib A, Jacob I, et al. Performance of MRI in early cervical cancer. Presented at the ARRS 102nd Annual Meeting. 28 April-3 May 2002, Atlanta, USA [abstract]. 178;3:26.
41. Desouza N.M., Dina R., McIndoe G.A., et al. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial invasion. Gynaecological Oncology 102 1 (2006) 80-85
42. Soutter W.P., Hanoch J., D'Arcy T., et al. Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer. BJOG 111 7 (2004) 741-747
43. Van de Blunt L., van der Heide U.A., Ketelaars M., et al. Conventional, conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: the impact of tumour regression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64 1 (2006) 189-196
44. Taylor A., Rockall A.G., Reznek R.H., et al. Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: Guidelines for delineation in intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 5 (2005) 1604-1612
45. Mayr N.A., Yuh W.T., Wang J.Z., et al. Early prediction of treatment outcome: functional MR imaging and standard clinical prognostic factors in advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 2 (2005) S97 (Suppl 1)
46. Singh K., Orakwue C.O., Honest H., et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of inguino-femoral lymph nodes in vulval cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 (2006) 1179-1183
47. Sohaib S.A., Richards P.S., Ind T., et al. MR imaging of carcinoma of the vulva. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 (2002) 373-377
48. Keller T.M., Michel S.C.A., Frohlich J., et al. USPIO-enhanced MRI for preoperative staging of gynecological pelvic tumors: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 14 (2004) 937-944