An analysis of the relationship between high school exit exams and diploma options and the impact on students with disabilities

Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 117-128

  Erickson, Amy S Gaumer ^a   Kleinhammer Tramill, Jeannie ^b   Thurlow, Martha L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548767073     PISSN: 10442073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10442073070180020201     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved June 18, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu
2. Associated Press. (2003, May 19). 13, 000 Florida seniors fail achievement test. Retrieved May 19, 2003, from http://story.news.yahoo.com
3. Bennett, W. F. (2004, November 6). For some, high school exit exam 'unfair.' New York Times. Retrieved November 7, 2004, from http://www.nytimes .com
4. Bowers, M. (2004, February 6). SOL scores could keep students from jobs, college. Virginian-Pilot. Retrieved March 5, 2004, from http://www .Pilotonline.com
5. Dorn, S. (2003). High-stakes testing and the history of graduation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(1). Retrieved October 30, 2004, from http:// epaa.asu.edu/epaa
6. General Accounting Office. (2003). Special education: Federal actions can assist states in improving postsecondary outcomes for youth. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Grant Foundation. (1988). The forgotten half: Pathways to success for America's youth and young families. Washington, DC: Author.
8. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
9. Guy, B., Shin, H., Lee, S. Y., & Thurlow, M. L. (1999). State graduation requirements for students with and without disabilities. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from the University of Minnesota, National Center on Education Outcomes Web site: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO
10. Hess, F. M., & Brigham, F. (2000). How kids pay for high-stakes testing. Education Digest, 66(3), 11-17.
11. Heubert, J. P. (2002). Disability, race, and high-stakes testing for students. In G. Orfield & D. Losen (Eds.), Minority issues in special education (pp. 137-165). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education.
12. Indiana Department of Education. (2003). Indiana Department of Education Consolidated State Application Accountability Workbook. Retrieved March 27, 2005, from http://www.doe.state.in.us/
13. Johnson, D. R., & Thurlow, M. L. (2003). A national study on graduation requirements and diploma options for youth with disabilities (Technical Report No. 36). Retrieved November 10, 2003, from the University of Minnesota, National Center on Education Outcomes Web site: http:// education.umn.edu/NCEO/
14. Kaufman, P., & Chapman, C. (2004). Dropout rates in the United States: 2001 (NCES 2005-046). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
15. Langenfeld, K. L., Thurlow, M. L., & Scott, D. L. (1997). High stakes testing for students: Unanswered questions and implications for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report No. 26). Retrieved October 15, 2002, from the University of Minnesota, National Center on Education Outcomes Web site: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/
16. Madrid, O. (2004. October 27). AIMS test obstructing special-ed students. Arizona Republic. Retrieved October 30, 2004, from http://www.azcentral. com
17. Miao, J., & Haney, W. (2004). High school graduation rates: Alternative methods and implications. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12(55). Retrieved November 1,2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v2012n2055/
18. Moran, R. F. (2000). Sorting and reforming: High-stakes testing in the public schools. Akron Law Review, 34(1), 107-135.
19. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The full account. Westford, MA: Murray.
20. National Leadership Summit on Improving Results for Youth. (2003). State priorities and needs for assistance. Retrieved October 30, 2004, from the University of Minnesota, National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Web site: http://www.ncset.org
21. O'Neill, P. T. (2001). Special education and high stakes testing for high school graduation: An analysis of current law and policy. Journal of Law & Education, 30, 185-222.
22. Orfield, G., Losen, D., Wald, J., & Swanson, C. B. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University & Urban Institute.
23. Perie, P., & Moran, R. (2005). The nation's report card: NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from the National Center for Education Statistics Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard /ltt/results2004/
24. Rothstein, R. (2002, October 9). Dropout rate is climbing and likely to go higher. New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2002, from http://www .nytimes.com
25. SCANS. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills.
26. Swanson, C. B. (2004). Who graduates? Who doesn't? A statistical portrait of public high school graduation, class of 2001. Retrieved August 10, 2005, from the Urban Institute, Educational Policy Center Web site: http:// www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410934_WhoGraduates.pdf
27. Thurlow, M., & Esler, A. (2000). Appeals processes for students who fail graduation exams: How do they apply to students with disabilities? (Synthesis Report No. 36). Retrieved November 1, 2002, from the University of Minnesota, National Center on Education Outcomes Web site: http:// education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis36.html
28. Thurlow, M. L., & Johnson, D. R. (2000). High-stakes testing of students with disabilities. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 305-314.
29. Thurlow, M. L., & Thompson, S. (2000). Diploma options and graduation policies for students with disabilities. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from the University of Minnesota, National Center on Education Outcomes Web site: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/
30. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
31. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Common core of data. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http:// nces.ed.gov/ccd/
32. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2004). Documentation Table 4: Report of children with disabilities exiting special education. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.ideadata.org
33. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1995). Delinquency: Prevention works (Program Summary). Washington, DC: Author.
34. Vernon, L. J., Baytops, J., McMahon, P., Padden, D., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2003). The reality of increased graduation requirements: A nationwide view of diploma options. NASSP Bulletin, 87, 2-14.
35. Winerip, M. (2003, August 12). The 'zero dropout' miracle: Alas! Alack! A Texas tall tale. New York Times. Retrieved August 12, 2004, from http:// www.nytimes.com
36. Zafft, C., Hart, D., & Zimbrich, K. (2004). College career connection: A study of youth with intellectual disabilities and the impact of postsecondary education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(1), 45-53.