Does carbofilm coating affect in-stent intimal proliferation? A randomized trial comparing Rx multi-link penta and tecnic carbostent™ stents

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 381-388

  Carrié, Didier ^a   Lefevre, Thierry ^b   Cherradi, Rhizlan ^a   Dumas, Pierre ^b   Elbaz, Meyer ^a   Finet, Gérard ^c   Puel, Jacques ^a   Morice, Marie Claude ^b  

^a CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

^b Institut Cardiologique J Cartier   (France)

^c LOUIS PRADEL HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; REVASCULARIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUNICA INTIMA; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 34548751241     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00281.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sick PB, Gelbrich G, Kalnins U, et al. Comparison of early and late results of a Carbofilm-coated stent versus a pure high-grade stainless steel stent (the Carbostent-Trial). Am J Cardiol 2004 93 : 1351 1356.
2. Pache J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: Strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAAR-STEREO-2) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 41 : 1283 1288.
3. Paccagnella C, Majni G, Ottaviani G, et al. Properties of a new carbon film for biomedical applications. Int J Artif Organs 1986 9 : 127 130.
4. Cenni E, Arciola CR, Ciapetti G, et al. Platelet and coagulation factor variations induced in vitro by polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) coated with pyrolytic carbon. Biomaterials 1995 Sep 16 : 973 976.
5. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel angioplasty prognosis study group. Circulation 1990 82 : 1193 1202.
6. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent study group. N Engl J Med 1994 331 : 489 495.
7. Mintz GS, Hoffmann R, Mehran R, et al. In-stent restenosis: The Washington Hospital Center experience. Am J Cardiol 1998 81 (7A 7E 13E.
8. Garasic JM, Edelman ER, Squire JC, et al. Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. Circulation 2000 101 : 812 818.
9. Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: A volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995 26 : 720 724.
10. Mehran R, Mintz GS, Hong MK, et al. Validation of the in vivo intravascular ultrasound measurement of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia volumes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 32 : 794 799.
11. Poerner T, Ludwig B, Duda SH, et al. Determinants of stent expansion in curved stenotic lesions: An in vitro experimental study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004 15 : 727 736.
12. Yamamoto Y, Brown DL, Ischinger TA, et al. Effect of stent design on reduction of elastic recoil: A comparison via quantitative intravascular ulrasound. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 1999 47 : 251 257.
13. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: Strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 2001 103 : 2816 2821.
14. Virmani R, Santarelli A, Galloni M, et al. Tissue response and biocompatibility of the Sorin Carbostent™ experimental results in porcine coronary arteries. Poster presented at Xth TCT, Washington, October 7-10, 1998.
15. Antoniucci D, Bartorelli A, Valenti R, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary arterial stenting with the carbostent. Am J Cardiol 2000 85 : 821 825.
16. Elbaz M, El Mokhtar E, Fourcade J, et al. Does stent design affect the long-term outcome after coronary stenting? Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2002 56 : 305 311.
17. Unverdorben M, Sippel B, Degenhardt R, et al. Tenax versus Nir Stent Study. Comparison of a silicon carbide-coated stent versus a noncoated stent in human beings: The Tenax versus Nir Stent Study's long-term outcome. Am Heart J 2003 145 : e17.
18. Rittersma SZH, de Winter RJ, Koch KT, et al. Impact of strut thickness on late luminal loss after coronary artery stent placement. Am J Cardiol 2004 93 : 477 480.
19. Briguoro C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, et al. In-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: Impact of strut thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 40 : 403 409.
20. Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij MJ, et al. TULIP Study. Thrombocyte activity evaluation and effects of ultrasound guidance in long intracoronary stent placement. Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenosis: Final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance. Circulation 2003 107 : 62 67.