The self-archiving principle: A momentous trek

Postgraduate Medical Journal

Volumn 83, Issue 983, 2007, Pages 564-567

  Singh, Nishith K ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION CENTER; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; FORECASTING; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; PUBLISHING; PUBMED;

EID: 34548749350     PISSN: 00325473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.056887     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Crawford BD. Open-access publishing: where is the value? Lancet 2003;362:1578-80.
2. Harnad S. The self-archiving initiative. The self-archiving initiative [Erratum, Nature 2001;411, 522].
3. Nature, 2001;410:1024-5.
4. Kyrillidou M. Journal costs: current trends & future scenarios for 2020. ARL Bimonthly Rep 2000;210.
5. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review - Part 1. Lancet 1996;347:1382-6.
6. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review - part 2. Lancet 1996;347:1459-63.
7. Germenis AE. Beyond the Ingelfinger Rule: the intellectual property ethics after the end of biomedical journals' monopoly. Med Inform Internet Med 1999;24:165-70.
8. Hamad S. A subversive proposal. In: Okerson A, O'Donnell J, eds. Scholarly journals at the crossroads; a subversive proposal for electronic publishing. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, June 1995, http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/toc.html (originally posted June 27 1994http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/sub01.html).
9. Harnad S. Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution Self-Archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. J Postgrad Med 2003;49:337-42.
10. Albert KM. Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 2006;94:253-62.
11. Alma Swan. Open access self-archiving: an introduction. Key Perspectives Ltd. (May 2005) www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/jiscsum.pdf.
12. Poynder R. Ten years after. Info Today. 2004;21: 1, 23-4, 44, (9).
13. Budapest Open Access Initiative, authors. Budapest Open Access Initiative. Feb 16 2003). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml.
14. Harnad S, Brody T, Vallieres F, et al. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Ser Rev 2004;30:310-4.
15. Steinbrook R. Public access to NIH-funded research. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1739-41.
16. Terry R. Funding the way to open access. PLoS Biol 2005;3:364-6.
17. Wellcome Trust. Wellcome Trust and National Library of Medicine in talks for worldwide open access archive (press release). http://www.wellcome. ac.uk/doc_WTX022826.html.
18. Vogel G, Enserink M. Information sharing. Europe steps into the open with plans for electronic archives. Science 2005;308:623-4.
19. Suber P. First fruits of the NIH public-access policy. SPARC Open Access News [serial online]. 2005 (88)..
20. Schroter S, Tite L, Smith R. Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. BMJ 2005;330:756.
21. Schroter S, Tite L. Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. J R Soc Med 2006;99:141-8.