Beyond the Ingelfinger Rule: The intellectual property ethics after the end of biomedical journals' monopoly

Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 165-170

  Germenis, A E ^a  

^a Athens Medical Society   (Greece)

Author keywords

Inglefinger Rule; Intellectual property; Internet; Scientific publication

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; ETHICS; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATENT; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84860403753     PISSN: 14639238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/146392399298366     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. INGELFINGER, F. J., 1969, Definition of 'sole contribution'. New England Journal of Medicine, 281, 676-677.
2. INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS, 1994, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (Philadelphia: American College of Physicians).
3. KASSIRER, J. P., and ANGELL, M., 1995, The Internet and the Journal. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 1709-1710.
4. ALTMAN, L. K., 1996, The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review - part 2. Lancet, 347, 1459-1463.
5. JUDSON, H. F., 1994, Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review JAMA, 272, 92-94.
6. GODLEE, F., 1996, Definition of 'authorship' may be changed. British Medical Journal, 312, 1501-1502.
7. SMITH, R., 1997, Authorship is dying: long live contributorship. British Medical Journal, 315, 696.
8. SMITH, R., 1997, Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? British Medical Journal, 314, 992.
9. EARLE, E., 1991, The effect of romanticism on the 19th century development of copyright law. Intellectual Property Journal, 6, 269-290.
10. HARNAD, S., 1991, Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review 2, 39-53.
11. BUSH, V., 1945, As we may think. Atlantic Monthly 176, 101-108.
12. NUNBERG, G., 1993, The places of books in the age of electronic reproduction. In Future Libraries, H. Bloch, C. Hesse (eds) (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 21-22.
13. ROSE, L., 1993, Is copyright dead on the Net? Wired, November, 112-113.
14. HARDIN, G., 1968, The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
15. HELLER, M. A., and EISENBERG, R. S., 1998, Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280, 698-701.