The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review - Part 1

Lancet

Volumn 347, Issue 9012, 1996, Pages 1382-1386

  Altman, Lawrence K ^a  

^a New York Times   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HISTORY; NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE;

HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029871846     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91016-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ingelfinger FJ. Definition of "sole contribution". N Engl J Med 1969; 281: 676-77.
2. Ingelfinger FJ. Medical literature: the campus without tumult. Science 1970; 169: 831-37.
3. Ingelfinger FJ. Shattuck lecture. The general medical journal: for readers or repositories? N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1258-64.
4. Kassirer JP, Angell M, The Internet and the journal. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1709-10.
5. Rosenberg SA. Secrecy in medical research. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 392-94.
6. Relman AS. An open letter to the news media. N Engl J Med 1979; 300: 554-55.
7. Altman LK. The myth of passing peer review. In: Bailer J, ed. Bethesda: Council of Biology Editors, 1990.
8. Culliton B. Dual publication: "Ingelfinger rule" debated by scientists and press. Science 1972; 176: 1403-05.
9. Ingelfinger FJ. The foggy poll. N Engl J Med 1969; 281: 386.
10. Ingelfinger FJ. Annual discourse - swinging copy and sober science. N Engl J Med 1969; 281: 526-32.
11. Elliott J. Relman of NEJM accused of restricting free news flow. NASW Newsletter. August, 1979: 5.
12. Relman AS. The Ingelfinger rule. N Engl J Med 1981; 305: 824-26.
13. Relman AS. Medical meetings should be back-grounders, not news. NASW Newsletter. November 1979: 9.
14. Bloom M. Relman stands alone at meeting with reporters. NASW Newsletter. November 1979: 10.
15. Huth EJ. News media and the question of prior publication. NASW Newsletter. January 1980: 9.
16. Breo DL. JFK's death the plain truth from the MDs who did the autopsy. JAMA 1992; 267: 2794-803.
17. Breo DL. JFK's death, part II - Dallas MDs recall their memories. JAMA 1992; 267: 2804-07.
18. Hines W. False, fraudulent studies slip by publications' review system. Chicago Sun-Times. May 17, 1989.
19. Relman AS. Lessons from the Darsee affair. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1415-17.
20. Altman LK. The NASBP Trials. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 810.
21. Judson G. Mother guilty in the killings of 5 babies. New York Times. April 22, 1995.
22. Relman AS. How reliable are letters? N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1219-20.
23. Relman AS. More on the Ingelfinger rule. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1125-26.
24. Relman AS. Medical research, medical journals and the public interest. J Soc Res Administrators1989; 21
25. Relman AS. Peer review in scientific journals: what good is it? West J Med 1990; 153: 520-22.
26. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Medical journals and society: threats and responsibilities. Ann Intern Med 1992; 232: 215-21.
27. Guarding the guardians: Research on editorial peer review. JAMA 1990; 263: 1309-1456.
28. Pini P. Media wars. Lancet 1995; 346: 1681-83.
29. Smith R. Promoting research into peer review. BMJ 1994; 309: 143-44.
30. Harris J. In: Medicine and the media: a changing relationship. Catigny conference series. Oct 13-14, 1994. Chicago: Robert R McCormick Tribune Foundation 1995: p 37.
31. Relman AS. Reporting the aspirin study. The journal and the media. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 918-20.
32. Relman AS. Our readers vote for the news embargo. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1680.
33. Wilkes MS, Kravitz RL. Medical researchers and the media: attitudes toward public dissemination of research. JAMA 1992; 268: 999-1003.