Exploring conformational space using a mean field technique with MOLS sampling

Journal of Biosciences

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 909-920

  Arun Prasad, P ^a   Kanagasabai, V ^a   Arunachalam, J ^a   Gautham, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Conformational analysis; Loop prediction; Mean field technique; MOLS sampling; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

OLIGOPEPTIDE;

GENETIC ALGORITHM; LIGAND; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; LATIN SQUARE DESIGN; LIGAND BINDING; MUTUALLY ORTHOGONAL LATIN SQUARES TECHNIQUE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 34548713030     PISSN: 02505991     EISSN: 02505991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-007-0091-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (69)

1. Anfinsen C B 1973 Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains; Science 181 223-230
2. Anfinsen C B, Robert R R, Warren I C, Juanita P and William R C 1954 Studies on the Gross Structure, Cross-Linkages, and Terminal Sequences in Ribonuclease; J. Biol. Chem. 207 201-210
3. Arunachalam J, Kanagasabai K and Gautham N 2006 Protein structure prediction using mutually orthogonal Latin squares and a genetic algorithm; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 342 424-433
4. Betancourt M R and Skolnick J 2001 Finding the needle in a haystack: deducing native folds from ambiguous ab initio protein structure predictions; J. Comp. Chem. 22 339-353
5. Böhm G 1996 New approaches in molecular structure prediction; Biophys. Chem. 59 1-32
6. Bowie J U and Eisenberg D 1994 An evolutionary approach to folding small a-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 4436-4440
7. Brooks B R, Bruccoleri R E, Olafson B D, States D J, Swaminathan S and Karplus M 1983 CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations; J. Comput. Chem. 4 187-217
8. Bujnicki J M 2006 Protein-Structure Prediction by Recombination of Fragments; Chem. Biol. Chem. 7 19-27
9. Chung S Y and Subbiah S 1996 Pac. Symp. Biocomput. (Hawaii) 126-141
10. Clark M, Cramer III R D and van Opdenhosch N 1989 Validation of the General Purpose Tripose 5.2 Force Field; J. Comp. Chem. 10 982-1012
11. Crivelli S, Eskow E, Bader B, Lamberti V, Byrd R, Schnabel R and Head G T 2002 A physical approach to protein structure prediction; Biophys. J. 82 36-49
12. Daisuke K, Hui L, Andrzej K and Jeffrey S 2001 TOUCHSTONE: An ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 10125-10130
13. Damm W A, Frontera J, Tirado-Rives and Jorgensen W L 1997 OPLS All-Atom Force Field for Carbohydrates; J. Comp. Chem. 18 1955-1970
14. Dandekar T and Argos P 1994 Folding the main chain of small proteins with the genetic algorithm; J. Mol. Biol. 236 844-861
15. Dandekar T and Argos P 1996 Identifying the tertiary fold of small proteins with different topologies from sequence and secondary structure using the genetic algorithm and extended criteria for strand regions; J. Mol. Biol. 256 645-660
16. Deane M C and Blundell T L 2000 A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins; Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet. 40 135-144
17. DePristo M A, de Bakker P I, Lovell S C and Blundell T L 2003 Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles; Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet. 51 41-55
18. Dill K A and Chan H S 1997 From Levinthal to pathways to funnels; Nat. Struct. Biol. 4 10-19
19. Duan Y and Kollman P A 2001 Computational protein folding: From lattice to all-atom; IBM Systems J. 40 297-309
20. Efimov A V 1993 Patterns of loop regions in proteins; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3 379-384
21. Eisenhaber F, Persson B and Argos P 1995 Protein structure prediction: Recognition of primary, secondary, and tertiary structural features from amino acid sequence; Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30 1-94
22. Finney D J 1955 Randomized blocks and Latin squares; in Experimental design and its statistical basis (London: Cambridge University Press) pp 45-67
23. Fiser A, Gian D K R and Sali R 2000 Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 9 1753-1773
24. Fisher R A 1960 The Latin square; in The design of experiments (London: Oliver and Boyd pp 70-92
25. Floudas C A, Klepeis J L and Pardalos, P M 1999 Global optimization approaches in protein folding and peptide docking. In DIMACS Series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science (eds) M Farach-Colton et al (New Jersey: American Mathematical Society) vol 47, pp 141-171
26. Gehlhaar D K, Verkhivker G M, Rejto P A, Sherman C J, Fogel D B, Fogel L J and Freer S T 1995 Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally fl exible docking by evolutionary programming; Chem. Biol. 2 317-324
27. Ginalski K, Grishin N V, Godzik A and Rychlewski L 2005 Practical lessons from protein structure prediction; Nuceic Acids Res. 33 1874-1891
28. Goldberg D E 1999 Genetic algorithms, in search, optimization and machine learning (Singapore: Pearson Education)
29. Griffin J F, Langs D A, Smith G D, Blundell T L, Tickle I J and Bedarkar S 1986 The crystal structures of [Met5]enkephalin and a third form of [Leu5]enkephalin: Observations of a novel pleated b-sheet; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 3272-3276
30. Hansmann U H E, Okamoto Y, and Onuchic J N 1999 The folding funnel landscape for the peptide Met-enkephalin; Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet. 34 472-483
31. Hardin C, Pogorelov T V and Luthey-Schulten Z 2002 Ab initio protein structure prediction; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 176-81
32. Howard A E and Kollman P A 1988 An analysis of current methodologies for conformational searching of complex molecules; J. Med. Chem. 31 1669-1675
33. Isogai Y, Nemethy G, and Scheraga H A 1977 Enkephalin: conformational analysis by means of empirical energy calculations; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 414-418
34. Kanagasabai V, Arunachalam J, Arun Prasad P and Gautham N 2007 Exploring the Conformational Space of Protein Loops Using A Mean Field Technique With MOLS Sampling; Prot. Struct. Funct. Bioinfo. 67 (in press)
35. Klepeis J L and Floudas C A 2003 Ab initio Tertiary Structure Prediction of Proteins; J. Glob. Optim. 25 113-140
36. Koehl P and Delarue M 1994 Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy; J. Mol. Biol. 239 249-75
37. Koehl P and Delarue M 1996 Mean-field minimization methods for biological macromolecules; Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6 222-226
38. Leach A R 1991 A survey of methods for searching the conformational space of small and medium-sized molecules; in Reviews in computational chemistry (eds) K B Lipkowitz and D B Boyd (New York: VCH Publishers) vol 2, pp 1-55
39. Leszczynski J F and Rose G D 1986 Loops in globular proteins: a novel category of secondary structure; Science 234 849-855
40. Levy Y and Becker O M 2001 Energy landscapes of conformationally constrained peptides; J. Chem. Phys 14 993-1009
41. Li Z and Scheraga H A 1987 Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 6611-6615
42. Lii, J H and Allinger N L 1991 The MM3 Force Field for Amides, Polypeptides and Proteins; J. Comp. Chem. 12 186-199
43. Montgomery D C 2000 Randomized blocks, Latin squares, and related designs; in Design and analysis of experiments (New York: John Wiley) pp 126-169
44. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A and Hubbard T 2003 Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V; Proteins (Suppl.) 53 334-339
45. Natasja B and Kuntz I D 2003 Molecular Recognition and Docking Algorithms; Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32 335-373
46. Nemethy G, Gibson K D, Palmer K A, Yoon C N, Paterlini G, Zagari A, Rumsey S and Scheraga H A 1992 Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometric parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides; J. Phys. Chem. 96 6472-6484
47. Neumaier A 1997 Molecular modeling of proteins and mathematical prediction of protein structure; SIAM Rev. 39 407-460
48. Onuchic J, Luthey S A, and Wolynes P G 1997 Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective; Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48 545-600
49. Plotkin S S and Onuchic J N 2002 Understanding protein folding with energy landscape theory Part II: Quantitative aspects; Q. Rev. Biophys. 35 205-286
50. Richard B and David B 2001 AB INITIO PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION: Progress and Prospects; Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30 173-189
51. Ring C S, Kneller D G, Langridge R and Cohen F E 1992 Taxonomy and conformational analysis of loops in proteins; J. Mol. Biol. 224 685-699
52. Rost B and O'Donoghue S 1997 Sisyphus and protein structure prediction; Bioinformatics 13 345-356
53. Rost B and Sander C 1994 Structure prediction of proteins - where are we now?; Curr. Opin. Biotech. 5 372-380
54. Schulze K S 2000 Genetic algorithm and protein folding; in Protein structure prediction - methods and protocols (ed.) D M Webster (New Jersey: Humana press) pp 175-222
55. i dimer database; Protein Sci. 4 1412-1420
56. Sun S 1995 A genetic algorithm that seeks native states of proteins; Biophys. J. 69 340-355
57. Takada S 2001 Protein Folding Simulation With Solvent-Induced Force Field: Folding Pathway Ensemble of Three-Helix-Bundle Proteins; Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet. 42 85-98
58. Taylor R D, Jewsbury P J and Essex J W 2002 A review of protein-small molecule docking methods; J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 16 151-166
59. Taylor R D, Jewsbury P J, Essex W J 2003 FDS: Flexible Ligand and Receptor Docking with a Continuum Solvent Model and Soft-Core Energy Function; J. Comput. Chem. 24 1637-1656
60. Unger R and Moult J 1993 Genetic algorithms for protein folding simulations; J. Mol. Biol. 231 75-81
61. Van Vlijmen T W H and Karplus M 1997 PDB based protein loop prediction: parameters for election and methods for optimization; J. Mol. Biol. 267 975-1001
62. Vásquez M, Némethy G and Scheraga H A 1994 Conformational energy calculations on polypeptides and protein; Chem. Rev. 94 2183-2239
63. Vengadesan K and Gautham N 2003 Enhanced sampling of the molecular potential energy surface using mutually orthogonal Latin squares: Application to peptide structures; Biophys. J. 84 2897-2906
64. Vengadesan K and Gautham N 2004a Conformational studies on enkephalins using the MOLS technique; Biopolymers 74 476-494
65. Vengadesan K and Gautham N 2004b The energy landscape of Metenkephalin and Leu-enkephalin drawn using mutually orthogonal Latin squares sampling; J. Phys. Chem. B 108 11196-11205
66. Wales D J, Doye J P K, Miller M A, Mortenson P N, and Walsh T A 2000 Energy landscapes: From clusters to biomolecules; Adv. Chem. Phys. 115 1-111
67. Weiner S J, Kollman P A, Nguyen D T and Case D A 1986 An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids; J. Comput. Chem. 7 230-252
68. Wojcik J, Mornon J and Chomilier J 1999 New efficient statistical sequence-dependant structure prediction of short to medium sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification; J. Mol. Biol. 289 1469-1490
69. Youxing Q, Jun-tao G, Victor O and Ying X 2004 Protein structure prediction using sparse dipolar coupling data; Nuceic Acids Res. 32 2551-2561