Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: Multicriteria multilevel decision aid model

Journal of Management in Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 200-206

  Mafakheri, Fereshteh ^a   Dai, Liming ^a   Slezak, Dominik ^a   Nasiri, Fuzhan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Approximation methods; Contract management; Decision support systems; Delivery; Multiple objective analysis; Project management; Uncertainty principles

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONTRACT MANAGEMENT; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS; PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34548664616     PISSN: 0742597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(200)     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alam, S. S., and Shrabonti, G. (2002). " Ranking by AHP: A rough approach.. " Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, International Society of Information Fusion, Annapolis, Md., 185-191.
2. Al Khalil, M. I. (2002). " Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP.. " Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20 (6), 469-474.
3. Beard, J. L., Wundram, E. C., and Loulakis, M. C. (2001). Design-build: Planning through development, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill Professional, Hightstown, N.J.
4. Brunso, T. P., and Siddiqi, K. M. (2003). " Using benchmarks and metrics to evaluate project delivery of environmental restoration programs.. " J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129 (2), 119-130.
5. Dorsey, R. W. (1997). Project delivery systems for building construction, Associated General Contractors of America, Washington, D.C.
6. Ferguson, H., and Keing, M. (2003). " The road to alternative project delivery.. " Proc., The SCUP-38th Annual Int. Conf., The Society for College and University Planning, Miami Beach, Fla.
7. Fong, P. S., and Choi, S. K. (2000). " Final contractor selection using the analytic hierarchy process.. " Constr. Manage. Econom., 18 (5), 547-557.
8. Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission (GSFIC). (2003a). Project delivery options: Selecting the appropriate project delivery option, Vol. 2, Version 2, Atlanta.
9. Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission (GSFIC). (2003b). Project delivery options: Understanding your options, Vol. 1, Version 2, Atlanta.
10. Ling, F. Y., Chan, S. L., Chong, E., and Ee, L. P. (2004). " Predicting performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects.. " J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130 (1), 75-83.
11. Mahdi, I. M., and Alreshaid, K. (2005). " Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP).. " Int. J. Proj. Manage., 23 (7), 564-572.
12. Mulvey, D. L. (1998). " Project delivery trends: A contractor's assessment.. " J. Manage. Eng., 14 (6), 51-54.
13. Osgood, B. (2000). " Excerpts from a quarterly survey of fortune 1000: Ranking project delivery methods.. " Strategy and Planning Division, VOA Associates Incorporated, Columbus, Ohio.
14. Oyetunji, A. A., and Anderson, S. D. (2006). " Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies.. " J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132 (1), 3-13.
15. Pawlak, Z. (1982). " Rough sets.. " Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci., 11 (5), 341-356.
16. Pawlak, Z. (1991). Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Boston.
17. Saaty, T. L. (1977). " A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.. " J. Math. Psychol., 15 (3), 234-281.
18. Saaty, T. L. (1995). Decision making for leaders, RWS, Pittsburgh.
19. Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process, RWS, Pittsburgh.
20. Sanvido, V. E., and Konchar, M. (1999). " Selecting project delivery systems: Comparing design-build, design-bid-build and construction management at risk.. " The Project Delivery Institute, State College, Pa.
21. Silva, A. D. (2002). " A model for optimizing the selection of project delivery systems using analytic hierarchy process (AHP).. " MASc thesis, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, Mich.
22. Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1996). " Selecting design-build: Public and private sector owner attitudes.. " J. Manage. Eng., 12 (6), 47-53.
23. Stillman, L. J., and Tomlinson, K. (1998). " A matrix for project delivery.. " Constr. Specifier, 3 (1), 50-55.
24. Sugihara, K., Maeda, Y., and Tanaka, H. (1999). " Interval evaluation by AHP with rough set concept.. " Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1711 (1), 375-381.
25. Sugihara, K., Hiroaki, I., and Tanaka, H. (2004). " Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis.. " Eur. J. Oper. Res., 158 (3), 745-754.
26. Tanaka, H. (2003). " Dual interval models and its application to decision making.. " Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2715 (1), 39-51.
27. Vargas, L. G. (1990). " An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its application.. " Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48 (1), 2-8.
28. Warne, T., and Beard, J. (2005). Project delivery systems owner's manual, American Council of Engineering Companies, Washington, D.C.