Ligand binding and protein dynamics in lactate dehydrogenase

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1474-1483

  Pineda, J R Exequiel T ^a   Callender, Robert ^a   Schwartz, Steven D ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; BINDING SITE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; MELTING POINT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOLVATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 34548638679     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.106146     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Druker, B. 2006. Circumventing resistance to kinase-inhibitor therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 354:2594-2596.
2. Muzammil, S., P. Ross, and E. Freire. 2003. A major role for a set of non-active site mutations in the development of HIV-1 protease drug resistance. Biochemistry. 42:631-638.
3. Rose, R., C. Craik, and R. Stroud. 1998. Domain flexibility in retroviral proteases: structural implications for drug resistant mutations. Biochemistry. 37:2607-2621.
4. Petsko, G., and D. Ringe. 2004. Protein Structure and Function. New Science Press, London.
5. McClendon, S., N. Zhadin, and R. Callender. 2005. The approach to the Michaelis complex in lactate dehydrogenase: the substrate binding pathway. Biophys. J. 89:2024-2032.
6. McClendon, S., D. Vu, K. Clinch, R. Callender, and R. Dyer. 2005. Structural transformations in the dynamics of Michaelis complex formation in lactate dehydrogenase. Biophys. J. 89:L7-L9.
7. Qiu, L., M. Gulotta, and R. Callender. 2007. Lactate dehydrogenase undergoes a substantial structural change to bind its substrate. Biophys. J. 93:1677-1686.
8. Basner, J. E., and S. D. Schwartz. 2004. Donor-acceptor distance and protein promoting vibration coupling to hydride transfer: a possible mechanism for kinetic control in isozymes of human lactate dehydrogenase. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108:444-451.
9. Burgner, J., and W. Ray. 1984. On the origin of lactate dehydrogenase induced rate effect. Biochemistry. 23:3636-3648.
10. Read, J., V. Winter, C. Eszes, R. Sessions, and R. Brady. 2001. Structural basis for altered activity of M- and H-isozyme forms of human lactate dehydrogenase. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Gen. 43:175-185.
11. Dunn, C., H. Wilks, D. Halsall, T. Atkinson, A. Clarke, H. Muirhead, and J. Holbrook. 1991. Design and synthesis of new enzyme based on the lactate dehydrogenase framework. Phil. Trans. R. Roc. Lond. B. 332:117-184.
12. Clarke, A., D. Wigley, W. Chia, D. Barstow, T. Atkinson, and J. Holbrook. 1986. Site-directed mutagenesis reveals role of mobile arginine residue in lactate dehydrogenase catalysis. Nature. 324:699-702.
13. Callender, R., and R. B. Dyer. 2002. Probing protein dynamics using temperature jump relaxation spectroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:628-633.
14. Sturtevant, J. 1977. Heat capacity and entropy changes in processes involving proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:2236-2240.
15. Prabhu, N., and K. Sharp. 2005. Heat capacity in proteins. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 56:521-548.
16. Cooper, A. 2005. Heat capacity effects in protein folding and ligand binding: a re-evaluation of the role of water in biomolecular thermodynamics. Biophys. Chem. 115:89-97.
17. Waldman, A., K. Hart, A. Clarke, D. Wigley, D. Barstow, T. Atkinson, W. Chia, and J. Holbrook. 1988. The use of a genetically engineered tryptophan to identify the movement of a domain of B. stearothermophilus lactate dehydrogenase with the process that limits the steady-state turnover of the enzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 150:752-759.
18. 4 at 2.9 Å resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 254:7611-7620.
19. Grau, U., W. Trommer, and M. Rossmann. 1981. Structure of the active ternary complex of pig heart lactate dehydrogenase with S-lac-NAD at 2.7 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 151:289-307.
20. Brunger, A., and M. Karplus. 1988. Polar hydrogen positions in proteins: empirical energy placement and neutron diffraction comparison. Proteins. 4:148-156.
21. Brooks, B. R., R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus. 1983. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4:187-217.
22. Zhang, L., and J. Hermans. 1996. Hydrophilicity cavities in proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Gen. 24:433-438.
23. Feller, S., Y. Zhang, R. Pastor, and B. Brooks. 1995. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103:4613-4621.
24. Makhatadze, G., and P. Privalov. 1990. Heat capacity of proteins. I. Partial molar heat capacity of individual amino acid residues in aqueous solution: hydration effect. J. Mol. Biol. 213:375-384.
25. Caves, L. S., J. D. Evanseck, and M. Karplus. 1998. Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin. Protein Sci. 7:649-666.
26. Amadei, A., A. B. M. Linssen, and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1993. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins. 17:412-425.
27. Hess, B. 2000. Similarities between principal components of protein dynamics and random diffusion. Phys. Rev. E. 62:8438-8448.
28. Ma, B., S. Kumar, C. Tsai, and R. Nussinov. 1999. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 9:713-720.
29. Myers, J., C. Pace, and J. Scholtz. 1994. Denaturant m-values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding. Protein Sci. 4:2138-2148.