Cognitive artifacts in support of medical shift handover: An in use, in situ evaluation

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 22, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 59-80

  Wilson, Stephanie ^a   Galliers, Julia ^a   Fone, James ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Framfab UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ARTIFACTS; CONTEXT OF USE; DISTRIBUTED COGNITION; EVALUATION STRATEGIES; INFORMATION CONTENTS; SITU EVALUATION; UBIQUITOUS APPROACH; WORK PRACTICES;

PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 34548572613     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc2201-02_4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. British Medical Association Junior Doctors' Committee. (2004). Safe handover: Safe patients. Author.
3. Bojko, A. (2006). Using eye tracking to compare Web page designs: A case study. Journal of Usability Studies, 1, 112-120.
4. Carroll, J. M., Kellogg, W. A., & Rosson, M. B. (1991). The task-artifact cycle. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 74-102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Diaper, D. (Ed.). (1989). Task analysis for human-computer interaction. Chichester, England: Ellis-Horwood.
6. Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Intellect.
7. Fu, L., Salvendy, G., & Turley, L. (2002). Effectiveness of user testing and heuristic evaluation as a function of performance classification. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21, 137-143.
8. Galliers, J., Wilson S., & Fone J. (in press). A method for determining information flow breakdown in clinical systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics.
9. Goodman, J., Brewster, S. A., & Gray, P. D. (2004). Using field experiments to evaluate mobile guides. In B. Schmidt-Belz & K. Cheverest (Eds.), Proceedings of HCI in Mobile Guides 2004 Workshop at Mobile HCI 2004, Glasgow, UK, Sept. 2004.
10. Grusenmeyer, C. (1995). Shared functional representation in cooperative tasks-The example of shift changeover. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5, 163-176.
11. Harper, R. (1998). Inside the IMF: An ethnography of documents, technology and organisational action. Academic.
12. Hartswood, M., Proctor, R., Rouncefield, M., Slack, R., Soutter, J., & Voss, A. (2003). 'Repairing' the machine: A case study of the evaluation of computer-aided detection tools in breast screening. Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 375-394.
13. Hartswood, M., Proctor, R., Slack, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2002). Finding order in the machine. Proceedings of the 21st European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Control, 205-208.
14. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991). Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London Underground control rooms. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 65-80.
15. Heathfield, H., Pitty, D., & Hanka, R. (1998). Evaluating information technology in healthcare: Barriers and challenges. British Medical Journal, 316, 1959-1961.
16. Hertzum, M. (1999). User testing in industry: A case study of laboratory, workshop and field tests. Proceedings of the 5th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, 59-72.
17. Hertzum, M., & Jacobsen, N. E. (2003). The evaluator effect: A chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 183-204.
18. Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Towards a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-176.
19. Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 79-102.
20. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., & Andersen, H. (1994). Moving out from the control room: Ethnography in system design. Proceedings CSCW'94, 429-439.
21. Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
23. Jones, P. H., & Nemeth, C. P. (2005). Cognitive artifacts in complex work. In Y. Cai (Ed.), Ambient intelligence for scientific discovery (pp. 152-183). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24. Kaikkonen, A., Kekäläinen, A., Cankar, M., Kallio, T., & Kankainen, A. (2005). Usability testing of mobile applications: A comparison between laboratory and field testing. Journal of Usability Studies, 1, 4-17.
25. Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. (2003). A review of MobileHCI research methods. Proceedings of the 5th International Mobile HCI 2003 conference, 317-335.
26. Kjeldskov, J., & Skov, M. B. (2003). Creating realistic laboratory settings: Comparative studies of three think-aloud usability evaluations of a mobile system. Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Interact 2003, 663-670.
27. Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M. B., Als, B. S., & Heegh, R. T. (2004). Is it worth the hassle? Exploring the added value of evaluating the usability of context-aware mobile systems in the field. Proceedings of the MobileHCI 2004 Conference, 61-73.
28. Kostopoulou, O., & Shepherd, A. (2000). Fragmentation of care and the potential for human error in neonatal intensive care. Human Error in Clinical Information Systems, 20(4) 78-92.
29. Krug, S. (2000). Don't make me think! A common sense approach to Web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
30. Lardner, R. (1996). Effective shift handover-A literature review (Offshore Technology Rep. No. OTO 96 003). Health and Safety Executive, Offshore Safety Division.
31. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mack, R. L., & Nielsen, J. (1994). Executive summary. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33. McFadden, E., Hager, D. R., Elie, C. J., & Blackwell, J. M. (2002). Remote usability evaluation: Overview and case studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 489-502.
34. Molich, R., Ede, M. R., Kaasgaard, K., & Karyukin, B. (2004). Comparative usability evaluation, Behaviour & Information Technology, 23, 65-74.
35. Nemeth, C. P., Cook, R. I., O'Connor, M., & Klock, P. A. (2004). Using cognitive artifacts to understand distributed cognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 34, 726-735.
36. Nielsen, J. (2000, March 19). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Alertbox: Current Issues in Web Usability. Retrieved December 5, 2006 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
37. Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L (Eds.). (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley.
38. Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Patterson, E. S., & Woods, D. D. (2001). Shift changes, updates, and the on-call architecture in space shuttle mission control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 317-346.
40. Patterson, E. S., Roth, E. M., Woods, D. D., Chow, R., & Orlando Gomes, J. (2004). Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: Lessons for health care operations. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 16, 1-8.
41. Perfetti, C., & Landesman, L. (2001). Eight is not enough. Retrieved December 5, 2006 from http://www.uie.com/articles/eight_is_not_enough/
42. Royal College of Physicians. (2005). Royal College of Physicians general professional training (GPT) handbook. Retrieved June 2, 2006 from www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/handbook/gpt/gpt_handbook_app4.htm
43. Shaffer, E. (2004). Institutionalization of usability: A step-by-step guide. New York: Addison-Wesley.
44. Tognazzini, B. (2001). How to deliver a report without getting lynched. Retrieved December 5, 2006 from http://www.asktog.com/columns/ 047HowToWriteAReport.html
45. Wears, R. L., Perry, S. J., Shapiro, M., Beach, C., Croskerry, P., & Behara, R. (2003). Shift changes among emergency physicians: Best of times, worst of times. Proceedings of the HFES 47th Annual Meeting, 1420-1423.
46. Wilson, S., Galliers, J., & Fone, J. (2005). Medical handover: A study and implications for information technology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Healthcare Systems, Ergonomics and Patient Safety (HEPS 2005), 333-336.
47. Xiao, Y., Lasome, C., Moss, J., Mackenzie, C. F., & Faraj, S. (2001). Cognitive properties of a whiteboard: A case study in a trauma centre. In W. Prinz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmidt, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 259-278). New York: Kluwer.