Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data

GEOPHYSICS

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 512-520

  Zhang, Changyou ^a,b   Mushayandebvu, Martin F ^a   Reid, Alan B ^a,c   Fairhead, J Derek ^a   Odegard, Mark E ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b Reid Geophysics ^*  (Canada)

^c Reid Geophysics   (United Kingdom)

^d CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY   (United States)

^e Kitson House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; DECONVOLUTION; EULERIAN MODEL; GRAVITY ANOMALY;

DECONVOLUTION; GRAVITATION;

EULER DECONVOLUTION; EULER SOLUTIONS; GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; GRAVITY VECTORS; GULF OF MEXICO; MASS MODELS; TENSOR GRADIENTS; VERTICAL COMPONENT;

TENSORS;

EID: 0034075133     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444745     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barnett, C. T., 1976, Theoretical modeling of the magnetic and gravitational fields of an arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional body: Geophysics, 41, 1353-1364.
2. Corner, B., and Wilsher, W. A., 1989, Structure of the Witwatersrand basin derived from interpretation of the aeromagnetic and gravity data, in Garland, G. D., Ed., Proceedings of exploration '87: Third decennial international conference on geophysical and geochemical exploration for minerals and groundwater: Ontario Geol. Survey, Special Vol. 3, 532-546.
3. Fairhead, J. D., Bennett, K. J., Gordon, R. H., and Huang, D., 1994, Euler: Beyond the 'Black Box': 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 422-424.
4. Forsberg, R., 1984, A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inverse methods in gravity field models: Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Report 355, Ohio State Univ. Heiskanen, W. A., and Moritz, H., 1967, Physical geodesy: W. H. Freeman.
5. Hood, P., 1965, Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying: Geophysics, 30, 891-802.
6. Huang, D., Gubbins, D., Clark, R. A., and Whaler, K. A., 1995, Combined study of Euler's homogeneity equation for gravity and magnetic field: 57th Conf. & Tech. Exhib., Euro. Assoc. Expl. Geophys., Extended Abstracts, P144.
7. Jekeli, C., 1985, On optimal estimation of gravity from gravity gradients at aircraft altitude: Rev. Geophysics 23, 301-311.
8. Klingele, E. E., Marson, I., and Kahle, H. G., 1991, Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: Vertical gradients: Geophys. Prosp., 39, 407-434.
9. Lawson, C. L., and Hanson, R. L., 1974, Solving least squares problems: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
10. Marson, I., and Klingele, E. E., 1993, Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation: Geophysics, 58, 1588-1595.
11. Nagy, D., 1966, The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism: Geophysics, 31, 362-371.
12. Nagy, D., and Fury, R. J., 1990, Local geoid computation from gravity using the fast Fourier transform technique: B. Geodesique, 64, 283-294.
13. Pratson, L. F., Bell, R. E., Anderson, R. N., Dosch, D., White, J., Affleck, C., Grierson, A., Korn, B. E., Phair, R. L., Biegert, E. K., and Gale, P. E., 1998, Results from a high-resolution 3-D marine gravity gradiometry survey over a buried salt structure, Mississippi Canyon Area, Gulf of Mexico, in Gibson, R., and Millegan, P., Eds., Geological applications of gravity and magnetics: Case histories: SEG Geophys. Ref. Series 8, AAPG Studies in Geology, 43, 137-145.
14. Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millett, A. J., and Somerton, I. W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
15. Reid, A. B., 1995, Euler deconvolution: past, present and future, a review: 65th Ann. Internat. Mtng., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 272-273.
16. Schwarz, K. P., Sideris, M. G., and Forsberg, R., 1990, The use of FFT techniques in physical geodesy: Geophys. J. Internat., 100, 485-514.
17. Stanley, J. M., and Green, R., 1976, Gravity gradients and the interpretation of the truncation plate: Geophysics, 41, 1370-1376.
18. Steenland, N. C., 1968, Discussion on 'The geomagnetic gradiometer' by H. A. Slack, V. M. Lynch, and L. Langan (Geophysics, 1967, 877-892): Geophysics, 33, 680-683.
19. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH-A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37.
20. Wilsher, W. A., 1987, A structural interpretation of the Witwatersrand basin through the application of automated depth algorithms to both gravity and aeromagnetic data: M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Witwatersrand.
21. Zhang, C., 1995, A general formula and its inverse formula for gravimetric transformations by use of convolution and deconvolution techniques: J. Geodesy, 70, 51-64.
22. Zhang, C., and Sideris, M. G., 1996, Ocean gravity by analytical inversion of Hotine's formula: Marine Geodesy, 9, 115-136.