The United States, Japan, and the European Union: Comparing political economy approaches to China

Pacific Review

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 397-421

  Wan, Ming ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

China; European Union; Great power; Japan; Political economy; United States

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; GLOBALIZATION; POLITICAL ECONOMY; POWER RELATIONS;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548421194     PISSN: 09512748     EISSN: 14701332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09512740701461520     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Algieri, F. (2002) EU economic relations with China: An institutionalist perspective. China Quarterly, 169, pp. 64-77.
2. Armacost, M. H. (2007) The mismatch between Northeast Asian change and American distractions. NBR Analysis, 18:1, pp. 5-12.
3. Armacost, M. H. and Pyle, K. B. (2001) Japan and the engagement of China: Challenges for US policy coordination. NBR Analysis, 12:5, pp. 5-62.
4. Blustein, P. (2005) 'Deal on textiles may only delay China's dominance'
5. Bureau of Economic Analysis of the US Department of Commerce (2007) 'Trade gap widens in 2006'
6. Bureau of Economic Analysis of the US Department of Commerce (2007) 'News'
7. China Ministry of Commerce (2007) 'Exports and imports by region in 2006'
8. Eurostat (2007) 'Euro-indicators news release'
9. Feng, Z. (2002) 'Zouxiang dongya ziyou maoyiqu zhi lu' [The path to the East Asian free trade area], Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi. World Economics and International Politics, 3, pp. 21-26.
10. Fewsmith, F. (1999) China and the WTO: The politics behind the agreement. NBR Analysis, 10:5, pp. 23-39.
11. Gowa, J. (1994) Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade, Princeton University Press, Princeton
12. Grieco, J. M. (1990) Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-tariff Barriers to Trade, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
13. Hu, Z. (2002) 'Dongya hezuo de xianzhuang yu weilai' [The present and future of East Asian cooperation]. Guoji wenti yanjiu [Journal of International Studies], 1, pp. 21-25.
14. International Monetary Fund [IMF] (2004) Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook 2004, IMF, Washington, DC
15. International Monetary Fund [IMF] (2006) World Economic Outlook Database
16. Japan Ministry of Finance (2007) 'News release'
17. Laprès, D. A. (2000) The EU-China WTO deal compared. China Business Review, 27:4, pp. 8-14.
18. Laprès, D. A. (2001) 'EU deal paves the way for China to finally join WTO'
19. Liberman, P. (1996) Trading with the enemy: Security and relative economic gains. International Security, 21:1, pp. 147-175.
20. Mastanduno, M. (1991) Do relative gains matter? America's response to Japanese industrial policy. International Security, 16:1, pp. 73-113.
21. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001) The future of the American pacifier. Foreign Affairs, 80:5, pp. 46-61.
22. Mochizuki, M. M. (2004) Terms of engagement: The US - Japan alliance and the rise of China. Beyond Bilateralism: US - Japan Relations in the New Asia Pacific, pp. 87-114. Stanford University Press, Stanford
23. Potter, P. B. (2001) The legal implications of China's accession to the WTO. China Quarterly, 167, pp. 592-609.
24. Shambaugh, D. (1996) China and Europe: 1949-1995, Contemporary China Institute, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London
25. Steinberg, R. H. and Stokes, B. (1999) Partners or Competitors? The Prospects for US-European Cooperation on Asian Trade, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
26. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute [SIPRI] Military Expenditure Database
27. Stokes, B. (1999) Taming the dragon: Integrating China into the global trading system. Partners or Competitors: The Prospects for US-European Cooperation on Asian Trade, pp. 177-192. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
28. Studwell, J. (1996) EU, US split on China's WTO bid. Journal of Commerce and Commercial Bulletin, p. 1A.
29. Sugihara, D., Yokozawa, C., Nishiura, H., Ootsuka, K. and Yamaoka, T. (2002) Chogoku no WTO kamei kosho keii to kameibunsho no kaisetsu [China's Accession to the WTO: The Process of Negotiations and an Explanation of the Accession Agreement], Sososha, Tokyo
30. Tiefer, C. (2001) Sino 301: How Congress can effectively review relations with China after WTO accession. Cornell International Law Journal, 34:1, pp. 55-93.
31. US Department of Defense (2005) The Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2005, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC
32. US Department of Defense (2006) Quadrennial Defense Review Report, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC
33. Viner, J. (1948) Power versus plenty as objectives of foreign policy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. World Politics, 1:1, pp. 1-29.
34. Wan, M. (2001) Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Relations: Defining and Defending National Interests, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
35. Wan, M. (2006) Sino - Japanese Relations: Interaction, Logic, and Transformation, Stanford University Press, Stanford
36. Wang, Y. (1999) Why China went for WTO?. China Business Review, 26:4, pp. 42-45.
37. Woo, W. T. (2001) Recent claims of China's economic exceptionalism - reflections inspired by WTO accession. China Economic Review, 12:2, pp. 107-136.
38. Yoshimatsu, H. (2002) Social demand, state capacity and globalization: Japan - China trade friction over safeguards. The Pacific Review, 15:3, pp. 381-408.