Evaluation of drug dependence: Use of a conditioned place preference paradigm

Folia Pharmacologica Japonica

Volumn 130, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 128-133

  Funada, Masahiko ^a   Aoo, Naoya ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; AMPHETAMINE; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; DIAZEPAM; LYSERGIDE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MORPHINE; N METHYL N [7 (1 PYRROLIDINYL) 1 OXASPIRO[4.5]DEC 8 YL]BENZENEACETAMIDE; NALOXONE; PENTOBARBITAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; REVIEW; ADDICTION; ANIMAL; DISEASE MODEL; MOUSE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; MICE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 34548420976     PISSN: 00155691     EISSN: 13478397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1254/fpj.130.128     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Nestler EJ. Nat Genet. 2000;26:277-281.
2. Stolerman I. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:170-176.
3. Japanese source
4. Weeks JR, et al. Screening for drug reinforcement using intravenous self-administration in the rat. Springer; 1987. p. 35-43.
5. Bardo MT, et al. Psychopharmacology. 2000;153:31-43.
6. Carr GD, et al. Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. Clarendon Press; 1989. p. 264-319.
7. Bozarth MA. Conditioned place preference: A parametric analysis using systemic heroin injections. Springer-Verlag; 1987. p. 241-273.
8. Japanese source
9. Narita M. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;89:1-15.
10. Japanese source
11. Cunningham CL, et al. Psychopharmacology(Berl). 2003;170:409-422.
12. Funada M, et al. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. 2002;10:47-54.
13. Colpaert FC. Drug discrimination: Methods of manipulation, measurement, and analysis. Springer-Verlag; 1987. p. 341-372.
14. Colpaert FC. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999;64:337-345.
15. Shaham Y, et al. Psychopharmacology. 2003;168:3-20.
16. Weiss F. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005;5:9-19.