Summaries of books in Spanish. Rhetoric and diachronic study;Las reseñas de libros en Español. Estudio retórico y diacrónico

Spanish in Context

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 29-49

  Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles ^a   Salager Meyer, Françoise ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548401824     PISSN: 15710718     EISSN: 15710726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sic.2.1.02ari     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles. 2000. Anglicismos en el lenguaje de las ciencias de la salud. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
2. Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles & Françoise Salager-Meyer. 2001."La disensión (¿directa o velada?) en la prosa médica española (1930-1999)". Lebende Sprachen 4. 180-185.
3. Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles & Françoise Salager-Meyer. 2002a."¿Cómo ha cambiado la disensión en la prosa médica española durante el periodo 1930-1999?". Panacela@ 3:7. 65-69.
4. Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles & Françoise Salager-Meyer. 2002b."Género y crítica en la prosa médica escrita en español: Función comunicativa y relación de poder". Hermes 29. 163-186.
5. Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles & Françoise Salager-Meyer. 2003."La ciencia en pugna: Análisis retórico de la crítica en el discurso médico escrito en español (1930-1999)". The ESPecialist 24:1. 103-129.
6. Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wise: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Bhatia, Vijay. 1993. Analyzing genres. Londres: Longman.
8. Belcher, Diane. 1995."Writing across the curriculum". Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy ed. por Diane Belcher & George Braine, 135-154. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
9. Berber-Sardinha & Antonio Paolo. 1995."Corpus choices in a short journalistic text". The ESPecialist 16:1. 1-21.
10. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Burgess, Sally. 2000."Books for review and reviewers for books: A genre analysis of print and electronic book reviews in linguistics". Comunicación presentada en la conferencia internacional sobre "Research & Practice in Professional Discourse", Hong Kong, 15-17 noviembre 2000.
12. Charteris-Black, Jonathan & Tim Ennis. 2001."A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting". English for Specific Purposes 20:3. 249-266.
13. Conrad, S. Magnusson. 1999."The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers". System 27:1. 1-18.
14. Espinoza, Ana María. 1997."Contrastive analysis of the Spanish and English passive voice in scientific prose". English for Specific Purposes 16:3. 229-244.
15. Expósito González, María de la Cruz. 1996. La estructura del sintagma nominal en el Inglés de la Cancillería: 1400-1450. Barcelona: Kadle Books.
16. Flowerdew, John & Tony Dudley Evans. 2002."Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors". Applied Linguistics 23:4. 463-489.
17. Fox, Robert Allen. 1999."The social identity of management ergolect". English for Specific Purposes 18:3. 261-279.
18. García-Guinea, Javier & José De La Sota Ríus. 1998."Las consecuencias de publicar en revistas científicas escritas en español en España". Interciencia 23:3. 185-187.
19. Gea Valor, María Lluïsa. 2000. A pragmatic approach to politeness and modality in book reviews. SELL Monograph. Valencia: Universitat de València.
20. Giannoni, Davide Simone. 2000."Hard words, soft technology. Criticism and endorsement in the software review genre". Conflict and negotiation in specialized texts ed. por Maurizio Gotti, Dorothée Heller & Marina Dossena, 335-362. Berna: Peter Lang.
21. Haan, Pieter de. 1992."The optimum corpus sample size?". New dimensions in English language corpora. Methodology, results, software development ed. by Gerhard Leitner, 3-19. Berlín & Nueva York: Mouton.
22. Henry, Alex & Robert L. Roseberry. 2001."A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: 'Letter of application'". English for Specific Purposes 20:2. 153-167.
23. Holmes, Richard. 1997."Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines". English for Specific Purposes, 16:4. 321-337.
24. Huckin, Thomas N. & Leslie Olsen. 1984."On the use of informants in LSP discourse analysis". Reading for professional purposes ed. por A. K. Pugh & Jan M. Ulijn, 120-129. Londres: Heinemann.
25. Hunston, Susan. 1993."Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse". Texts and technology. In honor of John Sinclair ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 115-134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
26. Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
27. Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taatvitsainen. 2000."Diachronie speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming". Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1:1. 67-97.
28. Kourilová, Magda. 1996."Interactive function of language in peer reviews of medical papers written by NN users of English". Unesco-Alsed-LSP Newsletter 19:1. 4-21.
29. MacDonald, Susan P. 1994. Professional and academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale & Edwardsville, Il.: Southern Illinois University Press.
30. Martín Municio, Ángel. 1998."El español y la ciencia". http://cvc. cervantes. es/obref/anuario/anuario98/martin: 247-256.
31. Moreno, Ana Isabel. 1997."Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs". English for Specific Purposes 16:3. 161-179.
32. Moreno, Ana Isabel. 1998."The explicit signalling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework". Text 18. 545-585.
33. Motta-Roth, Désirée. 1996."Same genre, different discipline: A genre-based study of book reviews in academe". The ESPecialist 17:2. 99-132.
34. Motta-Roth. Désirée. 1998."Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: A study of text and disciplinary cultures". Genre studies in English for academic purposes ed. by Inmaculada Fortanet, Santiago Posteguillo, Juan Carlos Palmer & Juan Francisco Coll, Collecció Summa, Sèrie Filología 9. 29-59. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I.
35. North, Stephen. 1992."On book reviews in rhetoric and composition". Rhetoric Review 10. 348-363.
36. Paltridge, Brian. 1997. Genre, frames and writing in research settings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth. 2002."Science in the making. Scientific conference presentations and the construction of facts". The language of conferencing ed. por Eija Ventola, Celia Shalom & Susan Thompson, 95-125. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
38. Salager- Meyer, Françoise. 1998a."Language is not a physical object". English for Specific Purposes 17:3. 295-302.
39. Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1998b."The rationale behind academic conflict: From outright criticism to contextual 'niche' creation". Unesco-Alsed-LSP Newsletter 21. 4-23.
40. Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1999."Contentiousness in written medical English discourse: A diachronic study (1810-1995)". Text 19. 371-398.
41. Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 2001."'This book portrays the worst form of mental terrorism': Critical speech acts in medical English book reviews". Approaches to the pragmatics of scientific discourse ed. by Andras Kertész, 47-72. Berlín: Peter Lang.
42. Salager-Meyer, Françoise & María Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza. 2001."Lo cortes no quita lo valiente: La retórica de la discrepancia en el discurso médico escrito en espaflol (1880-1899)". Discourse analysis and terminology in languages for specific purposes ed. by Juan Carlos Palmer, Santiago Posteguillo & Inmaculada Fortanet, Col-lecció Estudis Filològics 5. 15-24. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I.
43. Salager-Meyer, Françoise & Nahirana Zambrano. 2001."The bittersweet rhetoric of controversiality in 19th- and 20th-century French and English medical literature". Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2:1. 141-173.
44. Salager-Meyer, Françoise, María Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza & Nahirana Zambrano. 2002."Techno-science, compé titivité et acculturation: Étude interculturelle de la critique dans le discours médical". Traduire 194. 11-30.
45. Salager-Meyer, Françoise & María Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza. 2003."Academic criticism in Spanish medical discourse: A cross-generic approach (1930-1999)". International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13:1. 96-114.
46. Salager-Meyer, Françoise, María Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza & Nahirana Zambrano. 2003."The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930-1999)". English for Specific Purposes 22:3. 223-247.
47. Selinker, Larry. 1979."On the use of specialist informants in discourse analysis and languages for specialized purposes". International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching 17. 189-215.
48. Shaw, Philip. 2003."How do we recognise implicit evaluation in academic book reviews?". Comunicación presentada en la conferencia sobre "Evaluation in academic discourse", Certosa di Pontignano (Siena), 14-16 junio 2003.
49. Swales, John M. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston. Language Studies Unit.
50. Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Swales, John M. 1996."Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter". Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues ed. by Eija Ventola & Anna Mauranen, 45-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
52. Swales, John M. & Christine B. Feak. 2000. English in today's research world: A writer's guide. Michigan: Michigan University Press.
53. Valero-Garcés, Carmen. 1996."Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economic texts". English for Specific Purposes 15:4. 279-294.
54. Valero-Garcés, Carmen. 1997."Contrastive rhetoric in ESP: A cross-linguistic analysis of finite verb profiles in English and Spanish medical abstracts". Unesco-Alsed-LSP Newsletter 20:2. 22-36.
55. Valle, Ellen. 1999. A collective intelligence: The life sciences in the Royal Society as a scientific discourse community (1665-1965). Anglicana Turkuensia 17. Türkü: University of Türkü.
56. Webber, Pauline. 1996. Varieties in medical English. Milan: Argo.
57. Webber, Pauline. 2002."The paper is now open for discussion". The language of conferencing ed. by Eija Ventola, Celia Shalom & Susan Thompson, 227-253. Franfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
58. Williams. Ian A. 1999."Result section of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes". English for Specific Purposes 18:4. 347-366.
59. Zambrano, Nahirana. 1999."Las conffontaciones académicas (CCAA) en el discurso médico escrito en inglés y francés: Un estudio diacrónico comparativo (1810-1995)". Memoria de licenciatura inédita. Universidad de Mérida (Venezuela).