Sex-ratio evolution in nuclear-cytoplasmic gynodioecy when restoration is a threshold trait

Genetics

Volumn 176, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 2465-2476

  Bailey, Maia F ^a,b   Delph, Lynda F ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PROVIDENCE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; FEMALE FERTILITY; GYNODIOECY; HERMAPHRODITISM; MALE FERTILITY; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX RATIO;

BREEDING; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; EVOLUTION; GENES, PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 34548387531     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.076554     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ABAD, A.R., B.J. MEHRTENS and S.A. MACKENZIE, 1995 Specific expression in reproductive tissues and fate of a mitochondrial sterility-associated protein in cytoplasmic male-sterile bean. Plant Cell 7: 271-285.
2. ASHMAN, T.-L., 1999 Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 648-661.
3. ASHMAN, T.-L., 2000 Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology 81: 2577-2591.
4. ASHMAN, T.-L., 2002 The role of herbivores in the evolution of separate sexes from hermaphroditism. Ecology 83: 1175-1184.
5. BAILEY, M. F., 2002 A cost of restoration of male fertility in a gynodioecious species, Lobelia siphilitica. Evolution 56: 2178-2186.
6. BAILEY, M. F., and D. E. MCCAULEY, 2005 Offspring sex ratio under inbreeding and outbreeding in a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 59: 287-295.
7. BAILEY, M. F., L. F. DELPH and C. M. LIVELY, 2003 Modeling gynodioecy: novel scenarios for maintaining polymorphism. Am. Nat. 161: 762-776.
8. BARTON, N. H., and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 2002 Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 11-21.
9. BELHASSEN, E., B. DOMMÉE, A. ATLAN, P.-H. GOUYON, D. POMENTE et al., 1991 Complex determination of male sterility in Thymus vulgaris L.: genetic and molecular analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 137-143.
10. BOUTIN-STADLER, V., P. SAUMITOU-L APRADE, M. VALERO, R. JEAN and P. VERNET, 1989 Spatio-temporal variation of male sterile frequencies in two natural populations of Beta maritima. Heredity 63: 395-400.
11. BROWN, G.G., 1999 Unique aspects of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration in Brassica napus. J. Hered 90: 351-356.
12. CHARLESWORTH, D., and V. LAPORTE, 1998 The male-sterility polymorphismof Silene vulgaris: analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics 150: 1267-1282.
13. CHASE, C. D., and S. GABAY-LAUGHNAN, 2004 Cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration by nuclear genes, pp. 593-621 in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of Plant Organelles, edited by H. DANIELL and C. D. CHASE. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
14. COUVET, D., O. RONCE and C. GLIDDON, 1998 The maintenance of nucleocytoplasmic polymorphism in a metapopulation: the case of Gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 152: 59-70.
15. DARWIN, C., 1877 The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. Murray, London.
16. DELPH, L. F., 2003 Sexual dimorphism in gender plasticity and its consequences for breeding system evolution. Evol. Devel. 5: 334-339.
17. DELPH, L. F., P. A. TOUZET and M. F. BAILEY, 2007 Merging theory and mechanism in studies of gynodioecy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 17-24.
18. DILL, C. L., R. P. WISE and P. S. SCHNABLE, 1997 Rf8 and Rf* mediate unique T-urf13-transcript accumulation, revealing a conserved motif associated with RNA processing and restoration of pollen fertility restoration in T-cytoplasm maize. Genetics 147: 1367-1379.
19. DOMMÉE, B., M. W. ASSOUAD and G. VALDEYRON, 1978 Natural selection and gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 77: 17-28.
20. DUDLE, D. A., P. MUTIKAINEN and L. F. DELPH, 2001 Genetics of sex determination in the gynodioecious species Lobelia siphilitica: evidence from two populations. Heredity 86: 265-276.
21. ECKHART, V. M., 1992 The genetics of gender and the effects of gender on floral characters in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 792-800.
22. EHLERS, B. K., S. MAURICE and T. BATAILLON, 2005 Sex inheritance in gynodioecious species: a polygenic view. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 272: 1795-1802.
23. EMERY, S. N., and D. E. MCCAULEY, 2002 Consequences of inbreeding for offspring fitness and gender in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 1057-1066.
24. GLAETTLI, M., and J. GOUDET, 2006 Variation in the intensity of inbreeding depression and successive life-stages and generations in gynodioecious Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1995-2005.
25. GODLEY, E.J., 1955 Breeding systems in New Zealand plants. I. Fuchsia. Ann. Bot. 19: 549-559.
26. GOUYON, P.-H., F. VICHOT and J. M. M. VAN-DAMME, 1991 Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single-point equilibria versus limit cycles. Am. Nat. 137: 498-514.
27. GUITIÁN, P., and M. MEDRANO, 2000 Sex expression and fruit set in Silene littorea (Caryophyllaceae): variation among populations. Nordic J. Bot. 20: 467-473.
28. HOROVITZ, A., and A. BEILES, 1980 Gynodioecy as a possible populational strategy for increasing reproductive output. Theor. Appl. Genet. 57: 11-15.
29. KAUL, M. L. H., 1988 Male Sterility in Higher Plants. Springer-Verlag, New York.
30. KOELEWIJN, H. P., and J. M. M. VAN-DAMME, 1995 Genetics of male sterility in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus. I. Cytoplasmic variation. Genetics 139: 1749-1758.
31. KOHN, J. R., 1989 Sex ratio, seed production, biomass allocation, and the cost of male function in Cucurbita foetidissima HBK (Cucurbitaceae). Evolution 43: 1424-1434.
32. LEWIS, D., 1941 Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol. 40: 56-63.
33. LLOYD, D. G., 1974 Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32: 11-34.
34. MCCAULEY, D. E., M. S. OLSON, S. N. EMERY and D. R. TAYLOR, 2000 Population structure influences sex ratio evolution in a gynodioecious plant. Am. Nat. 155: 814-819.
35. MCCAULEY, D. E., M. F. BAILEY, N. A. SHERMAN and M. Z. DARNELL, 2005 Evidence for paternal transmission and heteroplasmy in the mitochondrial genome of Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Heredity 95: 50-58.
36. MURAYAMA, K., T. YAHARA and T. TERACHI, 2004 Variation of female frequency and cytoplasmic male-sterility gene frequency among natural gynodioecious populations of wild radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Mol. Ecol. 13: 2459-2464.
37. PRING, D. R., H. V. TANG, W. CHEN, W. HOWAD and F. KEMPKEN, 1999 A unique two-gene gametophytic male sterility system in sorghum involving a possible role of RNA editing in fertility restoration. J. Hered. 90: 386-393.
38. RONFORT, J., P. SAUMITOU-LAPRADE, J. CUGUEN and D. COUVET, 1995 Mitochondrial DNA diversity and male sterility in natural populations of Daucus carota ssp. carota. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 150-159.
39. ROSS, M. D., and H.-R. GrEGORIUS, 1985 Selection with gene-cytoplasm interactions. II. Maintenance of gynodioecy. Genetics 109: 427-439.
40. SCHULTZ, S. T., 2002 Partial male sterility and the evolution of nuclear gynodioecy in plants. Genet. Res. 80: 187-195.
41. SINGH, M., and G. G. BROWN, 1991 Suppression of cytoplasmic male sterility by nuclear genes alters expression of a novel mitochondrial gene region. Plant Cell 3: 1349-1362.
42. TAN, X. L., A. VANAVICHIT, S. AMORNSILPA and S. TRANGOONRUNG, 1998 Genetic analysis of rice CMS-WA fertility restoration based on QTL mapping. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 994-999.
43. TAYLOR, D. R., M. S. OLSON and D. E. MCCAULEY, 2001 A quantitative genetic analysis of nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility in structured populations of Silene vulgaris. Genetics 158: 833-841.
44. UNO, G. E., 1982 Comparative reproductive biology of hermaphroditic and male-sterile Iris douglasiana Herb. (Iridaceae). Am. J. Bot. 69: 818-823.
45. WADE, M. J., and D. E. MCCAULEY, 2005 Paternal leakage sustains the cytoplasmic polymorphism underlying gynodioecy but remains invasible by nuclear restorers. Am. Nat. 166: 592-602.