Birth order and sibship size: Evaluation of the role of selection bias in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 166, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 717-723

  Mensah, F K ^a   Willett, E V ^a   Simpson, J ^a   Smith, A G ^a   Roman, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Birth order; Case control studies; Lymphoma, non Hodgkin; Selection bias; Siblings

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; CENSUS; DEMOGRAPHY; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; BIRTH ORDER; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; RISK FACTOR; SIBLING; SOCIAL STATUS; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; VARIANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH ORDER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LYMPHOMA, NON-HODGKIN; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SELECTION BIAS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34548321301     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm131     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philapdelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998.
2. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Wing AL, Hyde RT. Characteristics in youth predictive of adult-onset malignant lymphomas, melanomas, and leukemias: brief communication. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978;60:89-92.
3. Cartwright RA, McKinney PA, O'Brien CO, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: case control epidemiological study in Yorkshire. Leuk Res 1988;12:81-8.
4. Holly EA, Lele C, Bracci PM, et al. Case-control study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among women and heterosexual men in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:375-89.
5. Vineis P, Miligi L, Crosignani P, et al. Delayed infection, family size and malignant lymphomas. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:907-11.
6. Becker N, Deeg E, Nieters A. Population-based study of lymphoma in Germany: rationale, study design and first results. Leuk Res 2004;28:713-24.
7. Grulich AE, Vajdic CM, Kaldor JM, et al. Birth order, atopy, and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:587-94.
8. Altieri A, Castro F, Bermejo JL, et al. Number of siblings and the risk of lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma by histopathology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1281-6.
9. Bracci PM, Dalvi TB, Holly EA. Residential history, family characteristics and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a population-based case-control study in the San Francisco Bay Area. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1287-94.
10. Greenland S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:1107-16.
11. Law GR, Smith AG, Roman E. The importance of full participation: lessons from a national case-control study. Br J Cancer 2002;86:350-5.
12. Richiardi L, Boffetta P, Merletti F. Analysis of nonresponse bias in a population-based case-control study on lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:1033-40.
13. Schuz J. Non-response bias as a likely cause of the association between young maternal age at the time of delivery and the risk of cancer in the offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003;17:106-12.
14. Glaser SL, Clarke CA, Keegan THM, et al. Attenuation of social class and reproductive risk factor associations for Hodgkin lymphoma due to selection bias in controls. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:731-9.
15. Hatch EE, Kleinerman RA, Linet MS, et al. Do confounding or selection factors of residential wiring codes and magnetic fields distort findings of electromagnetic fields studies? Epidemiology 2000;11:189-98.
16. Madigan MP, Troisi R, Potischman N, et al. Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:793-8.
17. Lahkola A, Salminen T, Auvinen A. Selection bias due to differential participation in a case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumors. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:321-5.
18. Mezei G, Kheifets L. Selection bias and its implications for case-control studies: a case study of magnetic field exposure and childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:397-406.
19. Hernán MA, Hernández-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004;15:615-25.
20. Willett EV, Smith AG, Dovey GJ, et al. Tobacco and alcohol consumption and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:771-80.
21. Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A. Health and deprivation: inequality and the North. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm, 1988.
22. Greenwood M, Yule GU. On the determination of size of family and of the distribution of characters in order of birth from samples taken through members of the sibships. J R Stat Soc 1914;77:179-99.
23. Smallwood S. New estimates of trends in births by birth order in England and Wales. Popul Trends 2002;108:32-48.
24. Hare EH, Price JS. Birth order and family size: bias caused by changes in birth rate. Br J Psychiatry 1969;115:647-57.
25. Price JS, Hare EH. Birth order studies: some sources of bias. Br J Psychiatry 1969;115:633-46.
26. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.
27. STATA statistical software: release 8.2. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2003.
28. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, et al. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:7-12.
29. Hemminki K, Kyyrönen P. Parental age and risk of sporadic and familial cancer in offspring: implications for germ cell mutagenesis. Epidemiology 1999;10:747-51.
30. Boffetta P, Linet M, Armstrong B. The Interlymph Collaboration: a consortium of molecular epidemiological studies of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. (Abstract). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2003;44:1579.
31. Pearce D, Britton M. The decline in births: some socioeconomic aspects. Popul Trends 1977;7:9-14.
32. Kiernan KE, Diamond I. The age at which childbearing starts - a longitudinal study. Popul Stud 1983;37:363-80.
33. Werner B. Fertility and family background: some illustrations from the OPCS Longitudinal Study. Popul Trends 1984;35:5-10.
34. Werner B. Fertility trends in different social classes: 1970 to 1983. Popul Trends 1985;41:5-13.