Selection bias and its implications for case-control studies: A case study of magnetic field exposure and childhood leukaemia

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 397-406

  Mezei, Gabor ^a   Kheifets, Leeka ^b  

^a ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Childhood leukaemia; Epidemiological methods; Extremely low frequency magnetic fields; Selection bias

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGEN; CHILD HEALTH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH RISK; MAGNETIC FIELD; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SOCIAL STATUS;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMANS; LEUKEMIA, RADIATION-INDUCED; PATIENT SELECTION; SELECTION BIAS; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 33645314736     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: 14643685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyi245     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Portier CJ, Wolfe MS. Assessment of health effects form exposure to power-line frequency electric and magnetic fields. NIEHS Working Group Report. NIH Publication No. 98-3981. Research Triangle Park, NC: NIEHS, 1998.
2. NRPB. ELF Electromagnetic fields and the risk of cancer. Documents of the NRPB. Vol. 12 (No. 1). Chilton, UK; National Radiological Protection Board, 2001.
3. IARC. Static and extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 80. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2002.
4. Ahlbom A, Cardis E, Green A, Linet M, Savitz D, Swerdlow A. Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and health. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109 (Suppl 6):911-33.
5. Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C, Kelsh MA. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Epidemiology 2000;11:624-34.
6. Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M et al. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 2000;83:692-98.
7. Linet MS, Hatch EE, Kleinermann RA et al. Residential exposure to magnetic fields and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Eng J Med 1997;337:1-7.
8. Hatch EE, Kleinerman RA, Linet MS et al. Do confounding or selection factors of residential wiring codes and magnetic fields distort findings of electromagnetic fields studies? Epidemiology 2000;11:189-98.
9. Langholz B. Factors that explain the power line configuration wiring code-childhood leukemia association: What would they look like? Bioelectromagnetics 2001;(Suppl. 5):S19-31.
10. Kavet R, Zaffanella LE, Pearson RL, Dallapiazza J. Association of residential magnetic fields with contact voltage. Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:530.
11. Kavet R, Zaffanella LE. Contact voltage measured in residences. Implications to the association between magnetic fields and childhood leukemia. Bioelectromagnetics 2002;23:464-74.
12. Jaffa KC, Kim H, Aldrich TE. The relative merits of contemporary measurements and historical calculated fields in the Swedish childhood cancer study. Epidemiology 2000;11:353-56.
13. Mezei G, Kheifets L. Is there any evidence for differential misclassification or for bias away from the null in the Swedish childhood cancer study? Epidemiology 2001;12:750-52. (Erratum in: Epidemiology 2002;13:116.)
14. Wartenberg D. The potential impact of bias in studies of residential exposure to magnetic fields and childhood leukemia. Bioelectromagnetics 2001; (Suppl. 5):S32-47.
15. Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004;15:615-25.
16. Savitz D, Wachtel H, Barnes FA, John EM, Tvrdik JG. Case-control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol 1988;128:21-38.
17. London SJ, Thomas DC, Bowman JD, Sobel E, Cheng T-C, Peters JM. Exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:923-37.
18. Feychting M, Ahlbom A. Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol 1993;138:467-81.
19. Olsen JH, Nielsen A, Schulgen G. Residence near high voltage facilities and risk of cancer in children. BMJ 1993;307:891-95.
20. Verkasalo PK, Pukkala E, Hongisto MY et al. Risk of cancer in Finnish children living dose to power lines. BMJ 1993;307:895-99.
21. Michaelis J, Schüz J, Meinert R et al. Childhood leukemia and electromagnetic fields: Results of a population-based case-control study in Germany. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:167-74.
22. Tynes T, Haldorsen T. Electromagnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Norwegian high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:219-26.
23. Dockerty JD, Elwood JM, Skegg DC, Herbison GP. Electromagnetic field exposures and childhood cancers in New Zealand. Cancer Causes Control 1998;9:299-309. (Erratum in: Cancer Causes Control 1999;10:641.)
24. Dockerty JD, Elwood JM, Skegg DC, Herbison GP. Electromagnetic field exposures and childhood leukaemia in New Zealand. Lancet 1999;354:1967-68.
25. Green LM, Miller AB, Agnew DA et al. Childhood leukemia and personal monitoring of residential exposures to electric and magnetic fields in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Causes Control 1999;10:233-43.
26. Green LM, Miller AB, Villeneuve PJ et al. A case-control study of childhood leukemia in southern Ontario, Canada, and exposure to magnetic fields in residences. Int J Cancer 1999;82:161-70.
27. McBride ML, Gallagher RP, Thériault HG et al. Power-frequency electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia in Canada. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:831-42.
28. UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators (UKCCS). Exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer. Lancet 1999;354:1925-31.
29. UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators (UKCCS). Childhood cancer and residential proximity to power lines. Br J Cancer 2000;82: 1073-102.
30. Schuz J, Grigat JP, Brinkmann K, Michaelis J. Residential magnetic fields as a risk factor for childhood acute leukaemia: Results from a German population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 2001;91:728-35.
31. Olson SH, Voigt LF, Begg CB, Weiss NS. Reporting participation in case-control studies. Epidemiology 2002;13:123-26.
32. Spinelli JJ, McBride ML, Abanto ZU, Tamaro S, Bajdik CD, Gallagher RP. Assessing response bias as an explanation for the observation of low socioeconomic status (SES) as a risk factor for childhood leukemia. (Abstract) Am J Epidemol 2001;153:S254 (948).
33. EPRI. Selection bias in epidemiologic studies of EMF and childhood leukemia. Proceedings of the 2001 Whistler workshop. Technical Report. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, 2003.
34. Poole C, Greenland S, Luetters C, Kelsey JL, Mezei G. Socioeconomic status and childhood leukaemia: A review. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35: 370-84.
35. Greenland S, Luetters C, Kelsey JL, Mezei G. Is socioeconomic status related to childhood leukemia incidence? (Abstract) Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:595 (378).
36. Gurney JG, Davis S, Schwartz SM, Mueller BA, Kaune WT, Stevens RG. Childhood cancer occurrence in relation to power line configurations: A study of potential selection bias in case-control studies. Epidemiology 1995;6:31-35.
37. Jones TL, Shih CH, Thurston DH, Ware BJ, Cole P. Selection bias from differential residential mobility as an explanation for associations of wire codes with childhood cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46: 545-48.
38. Ebi KL, Kheifets LI, Pearson RL, Wachtel H. Description of a new computer wire coding method and its application to evaluate potential control selection bias in the Savitz et al. childhood cancer study. Bioelectromagnetics 2000;21:346-53.
39. Schuz J, Feychting M. An evaluation of potential biases in epidemiological studies on childhood leukemia and exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. Abstract P-A-73. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Dublin, Ireland, 2005.
40. Kheifets LI. Electric and magnetic field exposure and brain cancer: A review. Bioelectromagnetics 2001;(Suppl. 5):S120-131.
41. Ross JA, Spector LG, Olshan AF, Bunin GR. Invited commentary: Birth certificates - A best control scenario? Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:922-24.