Target preexposure eliminates the effect of distraction on event-based prospective memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 484-488

  Guynn, Melissa J ^a   McDaniel, Mark A ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548312513     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194094     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. GOLLWITZER, P. M. (1999). implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
2. GUYNN, M. J., MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1998). Prospective memory: When reminders fail. Memory & Cognition, 26, 287-298.
3. JACOBY, L. L., KELLEY, C. M., & DYWAN, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. MANDLER, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
5. MÄNTYLÄ, T. (1993). Priming effects in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 203-218.
6. MÄNTYLÄ, T. (1994). Remembering to remember: Adult age differences in prospective memory. Journal of Gerontology, 49, P276-P282.
7. MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 336-349.
8. MCDANIEL, M. A. (1995). Prospective memory: Progress and processes. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 33, pp. 191-221). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
10. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. MCDANIEL, M. A., GUYNN, M. J., EINSTEIN, G. O., & BRENEISER, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 605-614.
12. MCDANIEL, M. A., ROBINSON-RIEGLER, B., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory & Cognition, 26, 121-134.
13. MOSCOVITCH, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. PAIVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1-25.
15. SMITH, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in eventbased prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 347-361.
16. SMITH, R. E., & BAYEN, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of eventbased prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 756-777.
17. UNDERWOOD, B. J., & SCHULZ, R. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Chicago: Lippincott.
18. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancyattribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3-13.
19. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancyattribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27,14-33.