A heuristic two-dimensional presentation of microsatellite-based data applied to dogs and wolves

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 447-463

  Veit Kensch, Claudia E ^a   Medugorac, Ivica ^a   Jedrzejewski, Włodzimierz ^b   Binevich, Aleksei N ^c   Foerster, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAMMAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^c State National Park Belovezhskaya Pushcha   (Belarus)

Author keywords

Dog; Genetic distance; Microsatellite; Two dimensional presentation

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; CANID; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENOTYPE; HEURISTICS; PHYLOGENETICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DOG; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; WOLF;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DOGS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS); WOLVES;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 34548046772     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2007014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bowcock A.M., Ruiz-Linares A., Tomfohrde J., Minch E., Kidd J.R., Cavalli-Sforza L.L., High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites, Nature 368 (1994) 455-457.
2. Brzustowski J., Doh assignment test calculator (2002) http://www2.biology.ualberta.ca/jbrzusto/Doh.php [consulted: 28 September 2006].
3. Chase K., Carrier D.R., Adler F.R., Jarvik T., Ostrander E.A., Lorentzen T.D., Lark K.G., Genetic basis for systems of skeletal quantitative traits: principal component analysis of the canid skeleton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 9930-9935.
4. Dighe A.S., Jangid K., González J.M., Pidiyar V.J., Patole M.S., Ranade D.R., Shouche Y.S., Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences of genus Methanobrevibacter, BMC Microbiology 4 (2004) 20.
5. Dueck G., New optimisation heuristics: the great deluge algorithm and record to record travel, J. Comp. Phys. 104 (1992) 86-92.
6. Efron B., Gong G., A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation, Am. Stat. 37 (1983) 36-48.
7. Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J.K., Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies, Genetics 164 (2003) 1567-1587.
8. Felsenstein J., Confidence limits on phylogenies. An approach using the bootstrap, Evolution 35 (1985) 783-791.
9. Felsenstein J., PHYLIP - Phylogeny Interference Package, Version 3.5, Department of Genetics, Washington University, Seattle, WA, 1993.
10. Francisco L.V., Langston A.A., Mellersh C.S., Neal C.L., Ostrander E.A., A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping, Mamm. Genome 7 (1996) 359-362.
11. Fredholm M., Wintero A.K., Variation of short tandem repeats within and between species belonging to the Canidae family, Mamm. Genome 6 (1995) 11-18.
12. Irion D.N., Schaffer A.L., Famula T.R., Eggleston M.L., Hughes S.S., Pedersen N.C., Analysis of genetic variation in 28 dog breed populations with 100 microsatellite markers, J. Hered. 94 (2003) 81-87.
13. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D. Jr., Vecchi M.P., Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220 (1983) 671-680.
14. Koskinen M.T., Individual assignment using microsatellite DNA reveals un-ambiguous breed identification in the domestic dog, Anim. Genet. 34 (2003) 297-301.
15. Koskinen M.T., Bredbacka P., Assessment of the population structure of five Finnish dog breeds with microsatellites, Anim. Genet. 31 (2000) 310-317.
16. Medugorac I., Genetischer Poymorphismus in Rinderrassen des Balkan und Phylogenie europäischer Rinder, Dissertation, Institute for Animal Breeding of Technical University of Munich, 1995.
17. Nei M., Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70 (1973) 3321-3323.
18. Nei M., Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals, Genetics 89 (1978) 583-590.
19. Nei M., Tajima F., Tateno Y., Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data, J. Mol. Evol. 19 (1983) 153-170.
20. Page R.D., TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers, Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12 (1996) 357-358.
21. Paetkau D., Calvert W., Sterling I., Strobeck C., Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears, Mol. Ecol. 4 (1995) 347-354.
22. Parker H.G., Kim L.V., Sutter N.B., Carlson S., Lorentzen T.D., Malek T.B., Johnson G.S., DeFrance H.B., Ostrander E.A., Kruglyak L., Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog, Science 304 (2004) 1160-1164.
23. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P., Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data, Genetics 155 (2000) 945-959.
24. Rosenberg N.A., Pritchard J.K., Weber J.L., Cann H.M., Kidd K.K., Zhivotovsky L.A., Feldman M.W., Genetic structure of human populations, Science 298 (2002) 2381-2385.
25. Slatkin M., Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations, Science 236 (1987) 787-792.
26. Slatkin M., Barton N.H., A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow, Evolution 43 (1989) 1349-1368.
27. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods, Taxon 11 (1962) 33-40.
28. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., Biometry - the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn., W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1998.
29. Storz J.F., Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence, Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 671-688.
30. Zajc I., Mellersh C.S., Sampson J., Variability of canine microsatellites within and between different dog breeds, Mamm. Genome 8 (1997) 182-185.