Analysis of Genetic Variation in 28 Dog Breed Populations with 100 Microsatellite Markers

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 81-87

  Irion, Dawn N ^a   Schaffer, A L ^a   Famula, T R ^a   Eggleston, M L ^a   Hughes, S S ^a   Pedersen, N C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREED; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC SELECTION; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; DOGS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 0348108331     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esg004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Altet L, Francino O, and Sanchez A, 2001. Microsatellite polymorphism in closely related dogs. J Hered 92:276-279.
2. Brinkmann B, Junge A, Meyer E, and Wiegand P, 1998. Population genetic diversity in relation to microsatellite heterogeneity. Hum Mutat 11:135-144.
3. Brohede J, Primmer CR, Moller A, and Ellegren H, 2002. Heterogeneity in the rate and pattern of germline mutation at individual microsatellite loci. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1997-2003.
4. Brouillette JA, Andrew JR, and Venta PJ, 2000. Estimate of nucleotide diversity in dogs with a pool-and-sequence method. Mamm Genome 11:1079-1086.
5. Eggleston ML, Irion DN, Schaffer AL, Hughes SS, Draper JE, Robertson KR, Millon LV, and Pedersen NC, 2002. PCR multiplexed microsatellite panels to expedite canine genetic disease linkage analysis. Anim Biotechnol 13:223-235.
6. Ellegren H, 2000. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet 16:551-358.
7. Felsenstein J, 2001. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.6 for Linux. Seattle: University of Washington.
8. Francisco LV, Langston AA, Mellersh CS, Neal CL, and Ostrander EA, 1996. A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 7:359-362.
9. Fredholm M and Wintero AK, 1995. Variation of short tandem repeats within and between species belonging to the Canidae family. Mamm Genome 6:11-18.
10. Goldstein DB, Ruiz Linares A, Cavalli-Sforza LL, and Feldman MW, 1995. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc Nad Acad Sci USA 92:6723-6727.
11. Guo SW and Thompson EA, 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361-372.
12. Hughes S, 1998. STR and nucleic acid analysis software. Davis: University of California. Available at http://www.vgl.ucdavis.edu/STRand.
13. Ichikawa Y, Takagi K, Tsumagari S, Ishihama K, Morita M, Kanemaki M, Takeishi M, and Takahashi H, 2001. Canine parentage testing based on microsatellite polymorphisms. J Vet Med Sci 63:1209-1213.
14. Kayser M, Roewer L, Hedman M, Henke L, Henke J, Brauer S, Kruger C, Krawczak M, Nagy M, Dobosz T, Szibor R, de Knijff P, Stoneking M, and Sajantila A, 2000. Characteristics and frequency of germline mutations at microsatellite loci from the human Y chromosome, as revealed by direct observation in father/son pairs. Am J Hum Genet 661580-1588.
15. Kittles RA, Bergen AW, Urbanek M, Virkkunen M, Linnoila M, Goldman D, and Long JC, 1999. Autosomal, mitochondrial, and Y chromosome DNA variation in Finland: evidence for a male-specific bottleneck. Am J Phys Anthropol 108:381-399.
16. Koskinen MT and Bredbacka P, 1999. A convenient and efficient microsatellite-based assay for resolving parentages in dogs. Anim Genet 30:148-149.
17. Koskinen MT and Bredbacka P, 2000. Assessment of the population structure of five Finnish dog breeds with microsatellites. Anim Genet 31:310-317.
18. Landry PA, Koskinen MT, and Primmer CR, 2002. Deriving evolutionary relationships among populations using microsatellites and (deltamu) (2): all loci are equal, but some are more equal than others. Genetics 161:1339-1347.
19. Lingaas F, Aarskaug T, Sorensen A, Moe L, and Sundgren PE, 1996. Estimates of genetic variation in dogs based on microsatellite polymorphism. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Animal Genetics. Tours, France, July 21-25. Anim Genet 27(suppl.):29.
20. MacHugh DE, Loftus RT, Cunningham P, and Bradley DG, 1998. Genetic structure of seven European cattle breeds assessed using 20 microsarellite markers. Anim Genet 29:333-340.
21. Margush T and McMorris FR, 1981. Consensus n-trees. Bull Math Biol 43: 239-244.
22. Mariat D, Kessler JL, Vaiman D, and Panthier JJ, 1996. Polymorphism characterization of five canine microsatellites. Anim Genet 27: 434-435.
23. Neff MW, Broman KW, Mellersh CS, Ray K, Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Ziegle JS, Ostrander EA, and Rine J, 1999. A second-generation genetic linkage map of the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. Genetics 151:803-820.
24. Nei M, 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Ota T, 1993. Program DISPAN: genetic distance and phylogenetic analysis. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
26. Raymond M and Rousset F, 1992. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
27. Redd AJ, Roberts-Thomson J, Karafet T, Bamshad M, Jorde LB, Naidu JM, Walsh B, and Hammer MF, 2002. Gene flow from the Indian subcontinent to Australia. Evidence from the Y chromosome. Curr Biol 12:673-677.
28. Rolf B, Horst B, Eigel A, Sanguansermsri T, Brinkmann B, and Horst J, 1998. Microsatellite profiles reveal an unexpected genetic relationship between Asian populations. Hum Genet 102:647-652.
29. Sigurgardottir S, Helgason A, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K, and Donnelly P, 2000. The mutation rate in the human mrDNA control region. Am J Hum Genet 66:1599-1609.
30. Sutton MD, Holmes NG, Brennan FB, Binns MM, Kelly EP, and Duke EJ, 1998. A comparative genetic analysis of the Irish greyhound population using multilocus DNA fingerprinting, canine single locus minisatellites and canine microsatellites. Anim Genet 29:168-172.
31. Takezaki N and Nei M, 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389-399.
32. Vila C, Maldonado JE, and Wayne RK, 1999. Phylogenetic relationships, evolution, and genetic diversity of the domestic dog. J Hered 90:71-77.
33. Wayne RK, 1993. Molecular evolution of the dog family. Trends Genet 9:218-224.
34. Webster MT, Smith NG, and Ellegren H, 2002. Microsatellite evolution inferred from human-chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8748-8753.
35. Weir BS, 1996. Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
36. Zajc I, Mellersh CS, and Sampson J, 1997. Variability of canine microsatellites within and between different dog breeds. Mamm Genome 8:182-185.
37. Zajc I and Sampson J, 1999. Utility of canine microsatellites in revealing the relationships of pure bred dogs. J Hered 90:104-107.
38. Zhou H and Lamont SJ, 1999. Genetic characterization of biodiversity in highly inbred chicken lines by microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 30: 256-264.