On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 171, Issue 10-15, 2007, Pages 730-753

  Coste Marquis, Sylvie ^a   Devred, Caroline ^a   Konieczny, Sébastien ^a   Lagasquie Schiex, Marie Christine ^b   Marquis, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

^b IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

Argument in agent system; Argumentation frameworks

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; DUNG'S THEORY;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 34548032549     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amgoud L., and Cayrol C. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Automated Reasoning 29 (2002) 125-169
2. Amgoud L., and Cayrol C. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34 (2002) 197-216
3. L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, S. Parsons, Arguments, dialogue and negotiation, in: Proc. of ECAI'00, 2000, pp. 338-342
4. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences, in: Intelligent Agents VIII: Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, 2002, pp. 190-205
5. L. Amgoud, H. Prade, Reaching agreement through argumentation: A possibilistic approach, in: Proc. of KR'04, 2004, pp. 175-182
6. Bench-Capon T. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 3 (2003) 429-448
7. Bench-Capon T., Doutre S., and Dunne P.E. Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 171 (2007) 42-71
8. Besnard P., and Hunter A. A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence 128 1-2 (2001) 203-235
9. Bochman A. Collective argumentation and disjunctive programming. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 3 (2003) 405-428
10. Cayrol C., and Lagasquie-Schiex M.-C. Graduality in argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 23 (2005) 245-297
11. Cayrol C., and Lagasquie-Schiex M.-C. On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. Proc. of ECSQARU'05. Lecture Notes Artif. Intell. vol. 3571 (2005), Springer-Verlag 378-389
12. Coste-Marquis S., Devred C., and Marquis P. Symmetric argumentation frameworks. Proc. of ECSQARU'05. Lecture Notes Artif. Intell. vol. 3571 (2005), Springer-Verlag 317-328
13. Dung P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357
14. Dunne P., and Bench-Capon T. Coherence in finite argument systems. Artificial Intelligence 141 (2002) 187-203
15. Elvang-Gøransson M., Fox J., and Krause P. Acceptability of arguments as logical uncertainty. Proc. of ECSQARU'93. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. vol. 747 (1993), Springer-Verlag 85-90
16. M. Elvang-Gøransson, J. Fox, P. Krause, Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information, in: Proc. of UAI'93, 1993, pp. 114-121
17. Elvang-Gøransson M., and Hunter A. Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information. Data and Knowledge Engineering 16 (1995) 125-145
18. Gordon T.F. The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice (1995), Kluwer Academic
19. Jakobovits H., and Vermeir D. Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 9 2 (1999) 215-261
20. Konieczny S., and Pino Pérez R. Merging information under constraints: a qualitative framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12 5 (2002) 773-808
21. Krause P., Ambler S., Elvang M., and Fox J. A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Computational Intelligence 11 1 (1995) 113-131
22. MacKenzie J. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical logic 8 (1979) 117-133
23. Nielsen S., and Parsons S. Computing preferred extensions for argumentation systems with sets of attacking arguments. Proc. of COMMA'06 (2006), IOS Press 97-108
24. S. Parsons, N.R. Jennings, Negotiation through argumentation-a preliminary report, in: Proc. of ICMAS'96, 1996, pp. 267-274
25. Pollock J.L. Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence 133 (2001) 233-282
26. Prakken H., and Sartor G. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1997) 25-75
27. Prakken H., and Vreeswijk G. Logics for defeasible argumentation. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4 (2002), Kluwer Academic 218-319
28. Walton D., and Krabbe E. Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning (1995), State University of New York Press