Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2333 LNAI, Issue , 2002, Pages 190-205

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Parsons, Simon ^b  

^a IRIT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

CONFLICTING PREFERENCES; CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 29344459204     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45448-9_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, and D. LeBerre. Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 400-403, 1996.
2. L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 31-38, Boston, MA, 2000.
3. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and N. Maudet. Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 338-342, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
4. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and L. Perrussel. An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied and Practical Reasoning, pages 59-67, 2000.
5. G. Brewka. Dynamic argument systems: a formal model of argumentation process based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation, 11(2):257-282, 2001.
6. M. Esteva, J. A. Rodríguez-Augilar, J. L. Arcos, C. Sierra, and P. Garcia. Institutionalising open multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, pages 381-382, 2000.
7. T. F. Gordon. The pleadings game. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2:239-292, 1993.
8. R. Kipling. Just So Stories. Everyman Library, 1992.
9. C. L.Hamblin. Fallacies. Methuen, London, 1970.
10. J. MacKenzie. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8:117-133, 1979.
11. P. McBurney and S.Parsons. Tenacious tortoises: A formalism for argument over rules of inference. In Worshop of Computational Dialectics: Models of argumentation, Negotiation, and Decision Making. 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2000.
12. R. McConachy and I. Zukerman. Dialogue requirements for argumentation systems. In Proceedings of IJCAI'99 Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, 1999.
13. P. Noriega and C. Sierra. Towards layered dialogical agents. In J. P. Muller, M. J. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents III, pages 173-188, Berlin, Germany, 1997. Springer Verlag.
14. S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261-292, 1998.
15. S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, and L. Amgoud. An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, 2001.
16. H. Prakken. On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence, Malaga, 2000.
17. C. Sierra, N. R. Jennings, P. Noriega, and S. Parsons. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, 1997.
18. K. Sycara. Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 28:203-242, 1990.
19. F. Tohmé. Negotiation and defeasible reasons for choice. In Proceedings of the Stanford Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, pages 95-102, 1997.
20. S. Zabala, I. Lara, and H. Geffner. Beliefs, reasons and moves in a model for argumentation dialogues. In Proceedings of the Latino-American Conference on Computer Science, 1999.