Route maps for Evidence-based problem Solutions (RESolutions): What's the evidence for journal cancellation?

Health Information and Libraries Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 298-303

  Booth, Andrew ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LIBRARY; LIBRARY SCIENCE; ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION; STANDARD;

DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT; LIBRARY MATERIALS; PERIODICALS;

EID: 34547969989     PISSN: 14711834     EISSN: 14711842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00681.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Burger, M., Zschorlich, B. Bastian, H. Four systematic reviews per day: the epidemiology of research synthesis. Poster no. 191. Presented at 13th Cochrane Colloquium Melbourne, Australia, 2005. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/colloquia/abstracts/melbourne/P-191.htm (accessed 28 August 2006).
2. Gotzsche, P. C. Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. British Medical Journal 2000, 321, 585 6.
3. Booth, A. The unteachable in pursuit of the unreadable? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2006, 1, 51 6. Available from: http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/eblip/article/view/48/118 (accessed 28 August 2006).
4. Genoni, P. Print serial cancellations in University libraries post 1990: what do the CAUL statistics reveal? Australian Academic and Research Libraries 2004, 35, 177 92.
5. Genoni, P. An assessment of Australian research library journal cancellations, 1990-2003. Australian Library Journal 2005, 54, 66 79.
6. Gallagher, J., Bauer, K. Dollar, D. M. Evidence-based librarianship: utilizing data from all available sources to make judicious print cancellation decisions. Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services 2005, 29, 169 79.
7. Watson, P. D. Raised expectations/rising prices. Library Technology Reports 2004, 40, 40 1.
8. Jaguszewski, J. Probst, L. The impact of electronic resources on serial cancellations and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries. Library Trends 2000, 48, 799 820.
9. Rupp-Serrano, K., Robbins, S. Cain, D. Cancelling print serials in favour of electronic: criteria for decision making. Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services 2002, 26, 369 78.
10. Montgomery, C. H. King, D. W. Comparing library and user-related costs of print and electronic journal collections. D-Lib Magazine 2002, 8, 10. Available from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html (accessed 28 August 2006).
11. Dess, H. Gauging faculty utilization of science journals: a defensive strategy for a lean budget era. Science Technological Libraries 1997, 16, 171 90.
12. Shearer, B. S. Nagy, S. P. Developing an academic medical library core journal collection in the (almost) post-print era: the Florida State University College of Medicine Medical Library experience. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2003, 91, 292 302.
13. Bucknell, T. Stanley, T. Design and implementation of a periodicals voting exercise at Leeds University Library. Serials 2002, 15, 153 9.
14. Altmann, K. G. Gorman, G. E. Can impact factors substitute for the results of local use studies? Findings from an Australian case study. Collection Building 1999, 18, 90 4.
15. Poll, R. Can we assess journal use? Performance Measurement and Metrics 2000, 1, 115 27.
16. Anonymous. Journals holding up - for now.... Library and Information Update 2006, 5 (6 3.
17. Blecic, D. D. Robinson, A. E. Use of print journals in an intracampus exchange program: implications for service and electronic journal subscriptions. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 2000, 88, 75 7.
18. Carey, R., Elfstrand, S. Hijleh, R. An evidence-based approach for gaining faculty acceptance in a serials cancellation project. Collection Management 2005, 30, 59 72.
19. Bradford, S. C. Documentation, 2nd edn. Washington, DC : Public Affairs Press, 1953.