The impact of electronic resources on serial cancellations and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries

Library Trends

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 799-820

  Jaguszewski, Janice M ^a   Probst, Laura K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034350084     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Library Association. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. Resources Section. Collection Management and Development Committee. Subcommittee on Review of Collections Resources Section. Lenore Clark. (Ed.). (1991). Guide to review of library collections: Preservation, storage, and withdrawal (Collection Management and Development Guides, No. 5). Chicago: American Library Association.
2. American Library Association. Resources and Technical Services Division. Resources Section. Collection Management and Development Committee. Subcommittee on Guidelines for Collection Development. Barbara Lockett. (Ed.). (1989). Guide to the evaluation of library collections (Collection Management and Development Guides, No. 2). Chicago: American Library Association.
3. Bane, A. F. (1995). Business Periodicals OnDisc: How full-text availability affects the library. Computers in Libraries, 15, 54-56.
4. Biemiller, L. (1999). California State U. adopts new model to pay for journals. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(45), A26-27.
5. Brown University. (n.d.). Collection development office: Procedures for selection of material for storage. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.brown.edu/ Facilities/University_Library/Storage/StorProc.html.
6. Buckland, M. K. (1990). Little-used duplicates, cooperative collection development, and storage. Collection Management, 13(4), 39-52.
7. Buckley, C.; Burright, M.; Prendergast, A.; Sapon-White, R.; & Taylor, A. (1999). Electronic publishing of scholarly journals: A bibliographic essay of current issues. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 22. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/99-spring/article4.html.
8. CIC Collection Development Officers and CIC Electronic Resources Officers. (1998). Preferred practices for CIC licensing of electronic journals. Champaign, IL: CIC Center for Library Initiatives. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http:// www. cic.uiuc.edu/cli/cdo_preferred_practices.html.
9. Dartmouth University. (1992). Final report. Storage library collections guidelines task force. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dartmouth.edu/library/libcirc/Transfer.html.
10. Davis, M. E. (1999). News from the field. High-tech, off-site facility housing books to be built. College & Research Libraries News, 60(5), 355.
11. Elsevier Science. (1999). Press release: New Elsevier Science journal pricing policy to accompany transition from print to digital delivery. Unpublished news release of June 14, 1999.
12. Everett, D. (1993). Full-text online databases and document delivery in an academic library: Too little, too late? Online, 17(2), 22-25.
13. Flynn, R. R. (1979). The University of Pittsburgh study of journal usage: A summary report. Serials Librarian, 4(1), 25-33.
14. st century: A handbook for librarians (pp. ix-xv). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15. Gyeszly, S. D.; Bustion, M.; & Treadwell, J. (1990). Infrequently used serials: A space utilization project. Collection Management, 12(1/2), 109-123.
16. Hart, M. (1992) What is Project Gutenberg? Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.promo.net/pg/history.html.
17. International Coalition of Library Consortia. (1998). Guidelines for statistical measures of usage of Web-based indexed, abstracted, and full text resources. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/webstats.html.
18. st century: A handbook for librarians (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
19. Lesk, M. E. (1997). Practical digital libraries: Books, bytes, and bucks. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
20. st century (pp. 207-228). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
21. Merrill-Oldham, J., & Reed-Scott, J. (1999). Library storage facilities, management, and services: A SPEC Kit (SPEC Kit 242). Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
22. Princeton University. (1999). Princeton, Columbia, New York Public Library to build high-tech, off-site facility housing 2 to 30 million books. Unpublished news release of March 25, 1999. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.princeton.edu:80/ pr/news/99/q1/0325-library.htm.
23. Rice, B. A. (1979). Science periodicals use study. Serials Librarian, 4(1), 35-47.
24. Silverstein, C., & Shieber, S. M. (1996). Predicting individual book use for off-site storage using decision trees. Library Quarterly, 66(3), 266-293.
25. Slote, S. J. (1989). Weeding library collections: Library weeding methods (3d ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
26. Smith, A. (1999). Why digitize? Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
27. University of Michigan. (1998). Making of America IV: The American voice, 1850-1876. Proposal submitted to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Retrieved September 2, 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://www.umdl.umich.edu/dpls/moa4/proposal.html.
28. White, G. W., & Crawford, G. A. (1998). Cost-benefit analysis of electronic information: A case study. College & Research Libraries, 59(6), 503-510.
29. Yale University. (1996). Final report of the working group [Off-Campus Shelving Report]. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.library.yale.edu/Administration/Shelving/WorkingGroup.html.
30. Yale University. (1999). Library shelving facility. Selection policy. Retrieved February 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.library.yale.edu/Administration/Shelving/ selection.html.