Automated margin analysis of contemporary adhesive systems in vitro: Evaluation of discriminatory variables

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 359-369

  Heintze, Siegward D ^a,b   Forjanic, Monika ^a   Roulet, Jean François ^a  

^a Research and Development Department   (Germany)

^b NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesive systems; Automated marginal analysis; Gap depth; Gap width; MI index; Optical sensor

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DENTAL LEAKAGE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY);

EID: 34547965841     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albrecht A, Manhart J, Chen H, Flessa H-P, Hickel R. Marginal adaptation of AdheSE self-etching primer after artificial aging [abstract 930], J Dent Res 2003;82(special issue A) (www.dentalresearch.org).
2. Anusavice KJ. Criteria for selection of restorative materials: properties versus technique sensitivity. In: KJ Anusavice (ed). Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:15-56.
3. Blunck U. Effectiveness of adhesives at class V cavities after three-year water storage [abstract 3944], J Dent Res 2004;83(special issue A) (www.dentalresearch.org).
4. Blunck U, Roulet JF. Effect of one-year water storage on the effectiveness of dentin adhesives in Class V composite resin restorations [abstract 946]. J Dent Res 2002;81(special issue A):139.
5. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive: 1 year results [abstract 192]. J Dent Res 2002;81(special issue A):52.
6. Brackett WW, Covey DA, St Germain HA, Jr. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002;27:218-222.
7. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:63-70.
8. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Prati C. Water movement in the hybrid layer after different dentin treatments. Dent Mater 2004;20:796-803.
9. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-420.
10. Ernst CP, Cortain G, Spohn M, Rippin G, Willershausen B. Marginal integrity of different resin-based composites for posterior teeth: an in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/adhesive combinations with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites. Dent Mater 2002;18:351-358.
11. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990;6:167-171.
12. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:397-412.
13. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:185-194.
14. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:991-1000.
15. Gagliardi RM, Avelar RP. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:582-586.
16. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 1986;65:1319-1321.
17. Hansen EK. Effect of Gluma in acid-etched dentin cavities. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:181-184.
18. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Effect of postponed polishing on marginal adaptation of resin used with dentin-bonding agent. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:260-264.
19. Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: (1) The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. (2) The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(suppl 1):77-106.
20. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A. Retention of restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions after centric and eccentric occlusal loading in a chewing simulator - a pilot study. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:169-174.
21. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Rousson V. The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:213-223.
22. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Jakob G. Automatic gap detection at restoration margins with an optical sensor in vitro. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:95-105.
23. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:133-141.
24. Itoh K, Yanagawa T, Wakumoto S. Effect of composition and curing type of composite on adaptation to dentin cavity wall. Dent Mater J 1986;5:260-266.
25. Mixson JM, Richards ND, Mitchell RJ. Effects of dentin age and bonding on microgap formation. Am J Dent 1993;6:72-76.
26. Montes MA, de Goes MF, Ambrosano GM, Duarte RM, Sobrinho LC. The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:378-387.
27. Munksgaard EC, Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Effect of five adhesives on adaptation of resin in dentin cavities. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:544-548.
28. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881.
29. Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:512-518.
30. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 2004;32:109-115.
31. Rahiotis C, Tzoutzas J, Kakaboura A. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:49-53.
32. Rathke A, Heintze SD. Prospective clinical trial on a posterior composite with a one-bottle adhesive [abstract 114]. J Dent Res 2001;80:1282.
33. Ritter AV, Heymann H, Pereira P, Sturdevant J, Swift JR J, Wilder A. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one self-etching dental adhesive [abstract 2568]. J Dent Res 2005;84(special issue A) (www.dentalresearch.org).
34. Turkun SL. Clinical evaluation of a self-etchingand a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 2003;31:527-534.
35. Unterbrink GL, Müssner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23:183-189.
36. Van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:27-32.
37. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
38. Wilson NH, Gordan VV, Brunton PA, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ, Mjör IA. Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/self-etching restorative system: three-year findings. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:47-51.