Neuroevolution applied to river level forecasting under winter flood and drought conditions

Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 373-386

  Abrahart, Robert J ^a   See, Linda M ^b   Heppenstall, Alison J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evolutionary algorithms; Neural networks; Rainfall runoff modeling

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DROUGHT; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; FLOODS; FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METEOROLOGY;

HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL DATASET; RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELING; SQUARED ERROR OBJECTIVE FUNCTION;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 34547955684     PISSN: 03341860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JISYS.2007.16.4.373     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agarwal, A. and Singh, R.D. 2004. Runoff modeling through back propagation artificial neural network with variable rainfall-runoff data, Water Resources Management, 18, 285-300.
2. Baratti, R., Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Pintus, M., Sechi, G.M. and Toreno, N. 2003. River flow forecast for reservoir management through neural networks, Neurocomputing, 55, 421-37.
3. Campolo, M., Soldati, A. and Andreussi, P. 2003. Artificial Neural Network Approach to flood forecasting in the River Arno, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48, 381-98.
4. Dawson, C.W. Abrahart, R.J. and See, L.M. 2007. HydroTest: a web-based toolbox of statistical measures for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environmental Modeling and Software, 27, 1034-52.
5. Fowler, H.J. and Kilsby, C.G. 2002. A weather-type approach to analysing water resource drought in the Yorkshire region from 1881 to 1998, Journal of Hydrology, 262, 177-92.
6. Horn, J., Goldberg, D.E. and Deb, K. 1994. Implicit niching in a learning classifier system: nature's way, Evolutionary Computation, 2, 27-66.
7. Hsu, K.L., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S. 1995. Artificial neural networks modeling of the rainfall-runoff process, Water Resources Research, 31, 2517-30.
8. Jain, A., Sudheer, K.P. and Srinivasulu, S. 2004. Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models, Hydrological Processes, 18, 571-81.
9. Jarvie, H.P., Neal, C. and Robson, A.J. 1997. The geography of the humber catchment, The Science of the Total Environment, 194/195, 87-99.
10. Kasabov N.K. 1996. Foundations of neural networks, fuzzy systems, and knowledge engineering, Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press.
11. Law, M., Wass, P. and Grimshaw, D. 1997. The hydrology of the humber catchment, The Science of the Total Environment, 194/195, 119-28.
12. Moriarty, D.E. and Miikkulainen, R. 1998. Forming neural networks through efficient and adaptive coevolution, Evolutionary Computation, 5, 373-99.
13. Minns, A.W. and Hall, M.J. 1996. Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41, 399-417.
14. Potter, M.A. 1997. The design and analysis of a computational model of co-operative coevolution. PhD Thesis: George Mason University.
15. Rajurkar, M.P., Kothyari, U.C. and Chaube, U.C. 2002. Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modeling, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 47, 865-77.
16. Sudheer, K.P. and Jain, A. 2004. Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models, Hydrological Processes, 18, 833-844.
17. Tingsanchali, T. and Gautam, M.R. 2000. Application of tank, NAM, ARMA and neural network models to flood forecasting, Hydrological Processes, 14, 2473-87.
18. Wilby, R.L., Abrahart, R.J. and Dawson, C.W. 2003. Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48, 163-81.