Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court

Political Analysis

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 324-346

  Fowler, James H ^a   Johnson, Timothy R ^b   Spriggs II, James F ^c   Jeon, Sangick ^d   Wahlbeck, Paul J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547869206     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpm011     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albert, Reka, and Albert-Laszlo Barabasi. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74:47-97.
2. Aldisert, Rugero J. 1990. Precedent: What it is and what it isn't; when do we kiss it and when do we kill it? Pepperdine Law Review 17:605-36.
3. Allen, Carleton Kemp. 1964. Law in the making. 7th ed. New York: Clarendon Press.
4. Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt. 1997. Congressional quarterly's guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5. Bonacich, Phillip. 1972. Factoring and weighing approaches to clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2:113 20.
6. Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1170-82.
7. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. The transmission of legal precedent: A study of state Supreme Courts. American Political Science Review 79:178-93.
8. Carmines, Edward G., and Richard A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Chandler, Seth J. 2005. The network structure of Supreme Court jurisprudence. In public law and legal Theory series. Report 2005-W-01, 26. Houston, TX: University of Houston Law Center.
10. Cross, Frank B., Thomas A. Smith, and Antonio Tomarchio. 2006. Determinants of cohesion in the supreme court's network of precedents. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-67. Social Science Research Network: Http://ssrn.com/abstract=924110 (accessed May 15, 2007).
11. Douglas, William O. 1979 [1949]. Stare decisis. In Courts, judges, and politics: An introduction to the judicial process, ed. Walter F. Murphy and C. Herman Pritchett, 66-71. New York: Random House.
12. Dworkin, Ronald, M. 1986. Law's empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
13. Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. Measuring issue salience. American Journal of Political Science 44:66-83.
14. Fowler, James H. 2006. Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis 14:456-87.
15. Freeman, Linton C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1:215-39.
16. Friedman, Lawrence M., Robert A. Kagan, Bliss Cartwright, and Stanton Wheeler. 1981. State Supreme Courts: A century of style and citation. Stanford Law Review 33:773-818.
17. Gibson, James L. 1997. United States Supreme Court judicial database, phase II: 1953-1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
18. Hall, Kermit L. 1999. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Hansford, Thomas G., and James F. Spriggs II. 2006. The politics of precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Hellman, Arthur D. 1983. Error correction, lawmaking, and the Supreme Court's exercise of discretionary review. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 44:795-877.
21. Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. 1991 [1881]. The common law. New York: Dover Publications.
22. Johnson, Charles A. 1987. Law, politics, and judicial decision making: Lower federal court uses of Supreme Court decisions. Law and Society Review 21:325-40.
23. Jones, Harry W. 1975. Our uncommon common law. Tennessee Law Review 42:443-63.
24. Kempin, Frederick G. 1959. Precedent and stare decisis: The critical years, 1800 to 1850. American Journal of Legal History 3:28-54.
25. Klein, David E. 2002. Making law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kleinberg, Jon M. 1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 46(5):604-632.
27. Kosma, Montgomery N. 1998. Measuring the influence of Supreme Court justices. Journal of Legal Studies 27:333-72.
28. Landes, William M., Lawrence Lessig, and Michael E. Solimine. 1998. Judicial influence: A citation analysis of federal courts of appeals judges. Journal of Legal Studies 27:271-332.
29. Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 1976. Legal precedent: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Law and Economics 19:249-307.
30. Levi, Edward H. 1949. An introduction to legal reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Lindquist, Stefanie A, and Frank B. Cross. 2005. Empirically testing Dworkin's chain novel theory: Studying the path of precedent. New York University Law Review 80: 1156-206.
32. Maltz, Earl. 1988. The nature of precedent. North Carolina Law Review 66:367-92.
33. McIntosh, Wayne, Ken Cousins, James Rose, Steve Simon, Mike Evans, Kimberly Karnes, John McTague, and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz. 2005. Using information technology to examine the communication of precedent: Initial findings and lessons from the CITE-IT project. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Assocation, Oakland, CA.
34. Merryman, John Henry. 1954. The authority of authority: What the California Supreme Court cited in 1950. Stanford Law Review 6:613-73.
35. Merryman, John Henry. 1977. Toward a theory of citations: An empirical study of the citation practice of the California Supreme Court in 1950, 1960, and 1970. Southern California Law Review 50:381-428.
36. Post, David G., and Michael B. Eisen. 2000. How long is the coastline of the law? Thoughts on the fractal nature of legal systems. Journal of Legal Studies 29:545-84.
37. Powell, Lewis F., Jr. 1990. Stare decisis and judicial restraint. Washington and Lee Law Review 47:281-90.
38. Proctor, C. H., and C. P. Loomis. 1951. Analysis of sociometric data. In Research methods in social relations, ed. P.W. Holland and S. Leinhardt, 561-86. New York: Dryden Press.
39. Rapp, Cynthia. 2004. A collection of in chambers opinions by the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Washington, DC: Green Bag Press.
40. Redner, S. 1998. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B 4:131-4.
41. Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. Jurisprudential regimes in Supreme Court decision making. American Political Science Review 96:305-20.
42. Schauer, Frederick. 1987. Precedent. Stanford Law Review 39:571-605.
43. Sirico, Louis J., Jr. 2000. The citing of law reviews by the Supreme Court, 1971-1999. Indiana Law Journal 75:1009-39.
44. Spriggs, James F., II, and Thomas G. Hansford. 2000. Measuring legal change: The reliability and validity of Shepard's citations. Political Research Quarterly 53:327-41.
45. Wahlbeck, Paul J. 1998. The development of a legal rule: The federal common law of public nuisance. Law & Society Review 32:613-37.
46. Wald, Patricia M. 1995. The rhetoric and the results of rhetoric: Judicial writings. University of Chicago Law Review 62:1371-419.
47. Wasby, Stephen L, Steven Peterson, James Schubert, and Glendon Schubert. 1992. The per curiam opinion: Its nature and functions. Judicature 76:29-38.
48. Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.