Phenotypic clustering of yeast mutants based on kinetochore microtubule dynamics

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1666-1673

  Jaqaman, K ^a   Dorn, J F ^a   Marco, E ^b   Sorger, P K ^b   Danuser, G ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAM1 PROTEIN; IPL1 PROTEIN; KIP3 PROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGUS MUTANT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METAPHASE; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; WILD TYPE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 34547852209     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm230     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Bar-Joseph, Z. (2004) Analyzing time series gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 20, 2493-2503.
2. Bar-Joseph, Z. et al. (2003) Continuous representations of time-series gene expression data. J. Comput. Biol., 10, 341-356.
3. Carle, G.F. and Olson, M.V. (1985) An electrophoretic karyotype for yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 82, 3756-3760.
4. Cheeseman, I.M. et al. (2002) Simple centromere, complex kinetochore: Linking spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol., 157, 199-203.
5. Chen, J.C. and Yuan, B. (2006) Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Bioinformatics, 22, 2283-2290.
6. Costa, I.G. et al. (2004) Comparative analysis of clustering methods for gene expression time course data. Genet. Mol. Biol., 27, 623-631.
7. De Wulf, P. et al. (2003) Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Gene Dev., 17, 2902-2921.
8. DeLuca, J.G. et al. (2006) Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hecl. Cell, 127, 969-982.
9. Dogterom, M. and Yurke, B. (1997) Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. Science, 278, 856-860.
10. Dom, J.F. et al. (2005) Yeast kinetochore microtubule dynamics analyzed by high-resolution three-dimensional microscopy. Biophys. J. 89, 2835-2854.
11. Eisen, M.B. et al. (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95 14863-14868.
12. Gardner, M.K. et al. (2005) Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 3764-3775.
13. Goh, P.Y. and Kilmartin, J.V. (1993) Ndc10 - a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol., 121, 503-512.
14. Handl, J. et al. (2005) Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis. Bioinformatics, 21, 3201-3212.
15. He, X. et al. (2000) Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell, 101, 763-775.
16. He, X.W. et al. (2001) Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell, 106 195-206.
17. Hubert, L.J. and Arabie, P. (1985) Comparing partitions. J. Classification, 2, 193-218.
18. Hyman, A.A. and Sorger, P.K. (1995) Structure and function of kinetochores in budding yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 11 471-495.
19. Jain, A.K. and Dubes, R.C. (1988) Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Jaqaman, K. et al. (2006) Comparative autoregressive moving average analysis of kinetochore microtubule dynamics in yeast. Biophys. J., 91, 2312-2325.
21. Kalpakis, K. et al. (2001) Distance measures for effective clustering of ARIMA time series, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference of Data Mining, San Jose, CA, USA, 273-280.
22. Liao, T.W. (2005) Clustering of time series data: A survey. Pattern recogn., 38, 1857-1874.
23. Maharaj, E.A. (2000) Cluster of Time Series. J. Classification, 17, 297-314.
24. Maiato, H. et al. (2004) The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J. Cell Sci., 117, 5461-5477.
25. Martin, R.J. (2000) A metric for ARMA processes. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 48, 1164-1170.
26. Meraldi, P. et al. (2006) Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. Genome Biol., 7, R23.
27. Milligan, G.W. and Cooper, M.C. (1986) A study of the comparability of external criteria for hierarchical cluster analysis. Muhivar. Behav. Res., 21, 441-458.
28. Miranda, J.L. et al. (2005) The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12, 138-143.
29. Piccolo, D. (1990) A distance measure for classifying ARIMA models. J. Time Series Anal., 11, 153-164.
30. Ramoni, M.F. et al. (2002) Cluster analysis of gene expression dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 9121-9126.
31. Robinett, C.C. et al. (1996) In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition. J. Cell Biol., 135, 1685-1700.
32. Sarno, E. (2001) Further results on the asymptotic distribution of the Euclidean distance between MA models. Quaderni di Statistica, 3 165-175.
33. Schliep, A. et al. (2005) Analyzing gene expression time-courses. IEEE-ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf., 2, 179-193.
34. Shang, C. et al. (2003) Kinetochore protein interactions and their regulation by the Aurora kinase Ip11p. Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 3342-3355.
35. Straight, A.F. et al. (1996) GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol., 6, 1599-1608.
36. Thomann, D. et al. (2003) Automatic fluorescent tag localization II: Improvement in super-resolution by relative tracking. J. Microsc. Oxf., 211, 230-248.
37. Thomann, D. et al. (2002) Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super-resolution: Application to the analysis of chromosome movement. J. Microsc. Oxf., 208, 49-64.
38. Waters, J. et al. (1996) Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci., 109, 2823-2831.
39. Westermann, S, et al. (2006) The Daml kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature, 440, 565-569.