The nexus between drug and alcohol treatment program integrity and drug court effectiveness: Policy recommendations for pursuing success

Criminal Justice Policy Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 226-245

  Lutze, Faith E ^a   van Wormer, Jacqueline G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547834148     PISSN: 08874034     EISSN: 15523586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0887403406302327     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abadinsky, H. (2004). Drugs: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Andrews, D.A. & Dowden, C. (2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of programme integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173 - 187.
3. Applegate, B.K., & Santana, S. (2000). Intervening with youthful substance abusers: A preliminary analysis of a juvenile drug court. Justice Systems Journal, 21, 281 - 300.
4. Austin, J., & Irwin, J. (2001). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge (3rd ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Banks, D., & Gottfredson, D. (2003). The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. Journal of Drug Issues, 33 (2), 385 - 412.
6. Barnoski, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington State's research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
7. Belenko, S., & Dembo, R. (2003). Treating adolescent substance abuse problems in the juvenile drug court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 87 - 110.
8. Bouffard, J., & Taxman, F. (2004). Looking inside the "black box" of drug court treatment services using direct observations. Journal of Drug Issues, 34 (1), 195 - 218.
9. Butts, J. A., & Roman, J. (Eds.). (2004). Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
10. Christianson, S. (1998). With liberty for some: 500 years of imprisonment in America. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
11. Clark, H.W. (2002). Bridging the gap between substance abuse practice and research: The national treatment plan initiative. Journal of Drug Issues, 32 (3), 757 - 768.
12. Clear, T.R., & Cadora, E. (2003). Community justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13. Cooper, C.S. (2005). What special issues do methamphetamine users present to drug court programs? Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance Drug Court Clearinghouse, American University.
14. Cullen, F.T., & Gilbert, K. (1982). Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
15. Currie, E. (2003). "It's our lives they're dealing with here": Some adolescent views of residential treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 33 (4), 833 - 864.
16. Dannerbeck, A., Harris, G., Sundet, P., & Lloyd, K. (2006). Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 5 (2), 1 - 22.
17. Doweiko, H.R. (2002). Concepts of chemical dependency. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth Group.
18. Elliot, L., Orr, L., Watson, L., & Jackson, A. (2005). Secondary prevention interventions for young drug users: A systematic review of the literature. Adolescence, 40 (157), 1 - 22.
19. Fisher, D.G., Reynolds, G.L., Moreno-Branson, C.M., Jaffe, A., Wood, M.M., Klahn, J.A., et al. (2004). Drug treatment needs of Hispanic drug users in Long Beach, California. Journal of Drug Issues, 34 (4), 879 - 894.
20. Gallon, S.L., Gabriel, R.M., & Knudsen, J.R. (2003). The toughest job you'll ever love: A Pacific Northwest treatment workforce survey. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 183 - 196.
21. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Hannah-Moffat, K. (1995). Feminine fortresses: Women-centered prison ? Prison Journal, 75 (2), 135 - 164.
23. Hawke, J.M., Jainchill, N., & De Leon, G. (2003). Posttreatment victimization and violence among adolescents following residential drug court treatment. Child Maltreatment, 8 (1), 58 - 71.
24. Hoffman, M. (2000). Commentary: The drug court scandal. North Carolina Law Review, 78 (5), 1480.
25. Hser, Y., Huang, Y., Teruya, C., & Anglin, M.D. (2004). Gender differences in treatment outcomes over a three-year period: A path model analysis. Journal of Drug Issues, 34 (2), 419 - 440.
26. Huddleston, C.W., Freeman-Wilson, K., Marlowe, D.B., & Rouseell, A. (2005). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving courts, I (2). Alexandra, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
27. Johnson, S., Hubbard, D., & Latessa, E. (2000). Drug courts and treatment: Lessons to be learned from the "what works" literature. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4 (4), 70 - 77.
28. Jernigan, T.L., Gamst, A.C., Archibald, S.L., Fennema-Notestine, C., Mindt, M., Marcott, T.L., Heaton, R.K., Ellis, R., & Grant, I. (2005). Effects of methamphetamine dependence and HIV infection on cerebral morphology. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162 (8), 1461 - 1472.
29. Kilmartin, C.T. (2000). The masculine self (2 nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
30. Leshner, A.I. (1999). Science-based views of drug addiction and its treatment. JAMA, 282 (14), 1314 - 1316.
31. Leshner, A.I. (2001). Addiction is a brain disease. Issues in Science and Technology Online. Retrieved 17 January, 2006 from . Spring.
32. Lester, D., & VanVoorhis, P. (2000). Cognitive therapies. In P. VanVoorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester (Eds.), Correctional Counseling and Rehabilitation (4th ed., pp. 167-190). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
33. Listwan, S.J., Sundt, J.L., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49 (3), 389 - 411.
34. Logan, T.K., Williams, K., Leukefeld, C., & Minton, L. (2000). A drug court process evaluation: Methodology and findings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44 (3), 369-394.
35. Lowenkamp, C.T. & Latessa, E.J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy, 4 (2), 263-290.
36. Lutze, F.E. (2006). Boot camp prisons and corrections policy: From militarism to an ethic of care. Criminology and Public Policy, 5 (2), 389-400.
37. Lutze, F.E., & Lucas, S. (2004). The benevolent state and juvenile drug courts: Process accountability as a check on discretion and disparity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Nashville, Tennessee.
38. Lutze, F.E., & Mason, K.A. (2006). Benton and Franklin Counties Juvenile Drug Court process and outcome evaluation. Unpublished research report. Pullman, WA: Washington State University.
39. Marlowe, D.B. (2002). Effective strategies for intervening with drug abusing offenders. Villanova Law Review, 47, 989-1026.
40. Marlowe, D.B. (2003). Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. Science & Practice Perspectives, 4-14.
41. McKenzie, D. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime & Delinquency, 46 (4), 457-471.
42. McLaughlin, M. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9 (2), 171-178.
43. Miller, W.R., Zweben, J., & Johnson, W.R. (2005). Evidence-based treatment: Why, what, where, when and how? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29, 267-276.
44. Monchick, R., Scheyett, A., & Pfeifer, J. (2006). Drug court case management: Role, function and utility. Alexandra, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
45. Muck, R., Zempolich, K.A., Titus, J.C., Fishman, M., Godley, M.D., & Schwebel, R. (2001). An overview of the effectiveness of adolescent substance abuse treatment models. Youth & Society, 33 (2), 143-168.
46. National Institute of Drug Abuse. (1999). Principals of drug addiction treatment: A research based guide. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Health (NIH Publication No. 00-4180).
47. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2002). Research report: Methamphetamine abuse and addiction. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 02-4210).
48. National Institute of Justice. (2006). Drug courts: The second decade. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
49. Olson, D., Lurigo, A., and Albertson, S. (2001). Implementing the key components of specialized drug treatment courts: Practice and policy considerations. Law and Policy Review, 23 (2), 171-196.
50. Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
51. Pearson, F.S., Lipton, D.S., Cleland, C.M., & Yee, D.S. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitivebehavioral programs on recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 48 (3), 476 - 496.
52. Pelissier, B., & Jones, N. (2005). A review of gender differences among substance abusers. Crime & Delinquency, 51 (3), 343-372.
53. Pisciotta, A. (1994). Benevolent repression: Social control and the American reformatory-prison movement. New York: New York University Press.
54. Rafter, N.H. (1985). Partial justice: Women in state prisons, 1800-1935. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
55. Rapheal, J. (2000). Saving Bernice: Battered women, welfare, and poverty. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
56. Roll, J.M., Prendergast, M., Richardson, K., Burdon, W., & Ramirez, A. (2005). Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 648-656.
57. Rothman, D. (1971). The discovery of the asylum: Social order and disorder in the new republic. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
58. Rothman, D. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in Progressive America. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
59. Sanford, J.S., & Arrigo, B.A. (2005). Lifting the cover on drug courts: Evaluating findings and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49 (3), 239-259.
60. Senjo, S.R., & Leip, L.A. (2001). Testing and developing theory in drug court: A four-part logic model to predict program completion. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12 (1), 66-87.
61. Sloan, J.J., & Smykla, J.O. (2003). Juvenile drug courts: Understanding the importance of dimensional variability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14 (3), 339-360.
62. Stoops, W.W., Tindall, M.S., Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., & Leukefeld, C. (2005). Methamphetamine use in nonurban and urban drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49 (3), 260-276.
63. Taxman, F.S., & Bouffard, J.A. (2003). Substance abuse counselors' treatment philosophy and the content of treatment services provided to offenders in drug court programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 75-84
64. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2005). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Report to congressional committees. Washington, DC: Author.
65. VanVoorhis, P. (1987). Correctional effectiveness: The high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation, 51, 56-62.
66. VanVoorhis, P. & Hurst, G. (2000). Treating substance abuse in offender populations. In P. VanVoorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester, Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (4 th ed., pp. 265-287). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
67. Vastag, B. (2003). Addiction poorly understood by clinicians: Experts say attitudes, lack of knowledge hinder treatment. JAMA, 290 (10), 1299-1303.
68. Wenzel, S.L., Turner, S.F., & Ridgely, M.S. (2004). Collaborations between drug courts and service providers: Characteristics and challenges. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 253-263.
69. Whitecare, K.W. (2004). Denial and adversity in a juvenile drug court. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 297-304.
70. Winters, K., Stinchfield, R., Opland, E., Weller, C., & Latimer, W. (2000). The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction, 95 (4), 601-612.
71. Wolf, E.M., & Colyer, C. (2001). Everyday hassles: Barriers to recovery in drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 31 (1), 233-258.
72. Wolfe, E.L., Guydish, J., Woods, W., & Tajima, B. (2004). Perspectives on the drug court model across systems: A process evaluation. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 36 (3), 379-386.