Methamphetamine use in nonurban and urban drug court clients

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 260-276

  Stoops, William W ^a   Tindall, Michele Staton ^b   Mateyoke Scrivner, Allison ^b   Leukefeld, Carl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug court; Methamphetamine; Nonurban; Urban

Indexed keywords

METHAMPHETAMINE;

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURT; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REVIEW; RURAL AREA; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; COMORBIDITY; CRIME; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; JUDICIAL ROLE; KENTUCKY; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MIDDLE AGED; PRISONERS; RECURRENCE; RURAL POPULATION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 18244362574     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X04273438     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Brecht, M.-L., O'Brien, A., von Mayrhauser, C., & Anglin, M. D. (2004). Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 89-106.
2. Derogatis, L. P., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595-605.
3. Edwards, R. W. (1992). Drug and alcohol use by youth in rural America: An introduction. In R. W. Edwards (Ed.), Drug use in rural American communities (pp. 1-8). Binghampton, NY: Haworth.
4. Freese, T. E., Obert, J., Dickow, A., Cohen, J., & Lord, R. H. (2000). Methamphetamine abuse: Issues for special populations. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32, 177-182.
5. Gibson, D. R., Leamon, M. H., & Flynn, N. (2002). Epidemiology and public health consequences of methamphetamine use in California's Central Valley. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 34, 313-319.
6. Hart, C. L., Ward, A. S., Haney, M., Foltin, R. W., & Fischman, M. W. (2001). Methamphetamine self-administration by humans. Psychopharmacology, 157, 75-81.
7. Herz, D. C. (2000). Drugs in the heartland: Methamphetamine use in rural Nebraska. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved April 17, 2003, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/njj/180986.pdf
8. Inciardi, J. A., & Martin, S. S. (1993). Drug abuse treatment in criminal justice settings. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 1-6.
9. Kosten, T. R., Rounsaville, B. J., & Kleber, H. A. (1987). Parental alcoholism in opioid addicts. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 461-468.
10. Lasseter, T. (2003, November 13). Homecoming queen-turned-addict found slain. Lexington Herald Leader, p. A1.
11. Leukefeld, C. G., Narevic, E., Hiller, M. L., Staton, M., Logan, T. K., Gillespie, W., et al. (2002). Alcohol and drug use among nonurban and urban incarcerated substance abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 715-728.
12. Logan, T. K., Williams, K., Leukefeld, C., & Minton, L. (2000). A drug court process evaluation: Methodology and findings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 715-728.
13. Lukas, S. E. (1997). Proceedings of the National Consensus Meeting on the use, abuse, and sequale of abuse of methamphetamine with implications for prevention, treatment, and research. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
14. McCann, U. D., & Ricaurte, G. A. (2004). Amphetamine neurotoxicity: Accomplishments and remaining challenges. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 821-826.
15. McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Metzger, D., Peters, F., Smith, I., Grissom, G., et al. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199-213.
16. McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., O'Brien, C. P., & Woody, G. (1980). An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 173, 412-423.
17. National Drug Intelligence Center. (2002). Kentucky Drug Threat Assessment. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs1/1540/ index.htm#Contents
18. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. (2002). 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Retrieved April 17, 2003, from http://www.samhsa.gov
19. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1991). Methamphetamine abuse: Epidemiologic issues and implications. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. (2003). 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.samhsa.gov
21. O'Brien, C. P. (2001). Drug addiction and drug abuse. In J. G. Hardman & L. E. Limbird (Eds.), Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics (10th ed., pp. 621-642). Chicago: McGraw-Hill.
22. Office of Applied Studies. (2001). The DASIS Report: Amphetamine treatment admissions increase: 1993-1999. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
23. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2002). State of Kentucky: Profile of Drug Indicators, August 2002. Washington, DC: Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse.
24. Pennell, S., Ellett, J., Rienick, C., & Grimes, J. (1999). Meth matters: Report on methamphetamine users in five western cities. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
25. Poovey, B. (2004). Tennessee lawmakers decide meth crackdown will have to wait. Retrieved March 30, 2004, from http://www.ap.org
26. Rawson, R. A., Anglin, M. D., & Ling, W. (2002). Will the methamphetamine problem go away? Journal of Addictive Disorders, 21, 5-19.
27. Schlesinger, A. (2004). Meth manufacturing, abuse slowly moves to Pa.'s urban areas. Retrieved March 30, 2004, from http://www.ap.org
28. Steetdrugs.org. (2003). Meth Labs. Retrieved May 7, 2003, from http://www.steetdrugs.org/methlabs.htm
29. Wermuth, L. (2000). Methamphetamine use: Hazards and social influences. Journal of Drug Education, 30, 423-433.
30. Yokel, R. A., & Wise, R. A. (1975). Increased lever pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: Implications for a dopamine theory of reward. Science, 187, 547-549.