Pollen-stigma interference in two gynodioecious species of Lamiaceae with intermediate individuals

Annals of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 423-431

  Rodríguez Riaño, Tomás ^a   Dafni, Amots ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Dichogamy; Gynodioecy; Lamiaceae; Origanum syriacum; Pollen discounting; Pollen viability; Pollen stigma interference; Protandry; Stigma receptivity; Style elongation; Style movement; Teucrium capitatum

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; AUTOGAMY; FLOWER; GYNODIOECY; POLLEN LIMITATION; PROTANDRY;

CONFERENCE PAPER; FLOWER; GERMANDER; HISTOLOGY; INBREEDING; OREGANO; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEX DIFFERENTIATION; TIME;

FLOWERS; INBREEDING; ORIGANUM; REPRODUCTION; SEX DIFFERENTIATION; TEUCRIUM; TIME FACTORS;

LAMIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; ORIGANUM; ORIGANUM SYRIACUM; TEUCRIUM; TEUCRIUM CAPITATUM;

EID: 34547739993     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Ågren J, Willson MF. 1991. Gender variation and sexual differences in reproductive characters and seed production in gynodioecious Geranium maculatum. American Journal of Botany 78: 470-480.
2. Atlan A, Gouton PH, Fournial T, Pomente D, Couvet D. 1992. Sex allocation in a hermaphrodite plant: the case of gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5: 189-203.
3. Baker HG. 1948. Corolla-size in gynodioecious and gynomonodioecious species of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and literary Society (Scientific section) 5: 136-139.
4. Bawa KS. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
5. Bawa KS, Beach JH. 1981. Evolution of sexual systems in flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 254-274.
6. Bertin RI, Newman CM. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Botanical Review 59: 112-152.
7. Beker R, Dafni A, Eisikovitch D. 1990. Volatiles of two chemotypes of Majorana syriaca L. (Labiatae) as olfactory cues for the honey bee. Oecologia 79: 446-451.
8. Charlesworth D. 1981. A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in gynodioecious species. Heredity 46: 27-39.
9. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary significance. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-268.
10. Dafni A, Maués MM. 1998. A rapid and simple procedure to determine stigma receptivity. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 177-180.
11. Darwin C. 1896. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
12. Delph LF. 1996. Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In: Lloyd DG, Barret SCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollianted plants. New York: Chapman & Hall, 217-237.
13. Delph LF, Lively CM. 1992. Pollinator visitation, floral display, and nectar production of the sexual morphs of a gynodioecious shrub. Oikos 63: 161-170.
14. Dinnétz P. 1997. Male sterility, protogyny, and pollen-pistil interference in Plantago maritima (Plantaginaceae), a wind-pollinated, self-incompatible perennial. American Journal of Botany 84: 1588-1594.
15. Dudai N, Halevy AH, Putievsky E, Ravid U. 1989. Origanum syriacum var. syriacum. In: Halevy AH, ed. Handbook of flowering, vol. VI. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 487-489.
16. Dulberger R. 1984. Gender polymorphism in flowers of Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke (Caryophyllaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 101-117.
17. Eckhart VM. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 123-148.
18. Feinbrun-Dothan N. 1986. Flora Palestina, vol. III. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
19. Fetscher AE. 2001. Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268: 525-529.
20. García FM, Muñoz JMA.. 1988. Ginodioecia en Teucrium fruticans L. comparación entre formas MF y MS. Lagascalia 15 (suppl.): 691-696.
21. Gibson JP, Diggle PK. 1997. Structural analysis of female and hermaphroditic flowers of a gynodioecious tree, Ocotea tenera (Lauraceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 298-307.
22. Hidalgo PJ, Hesse M, Ubera JL, Frosch-Radivo A. 1999. Microsporogenesis in male sterile Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Lamiaceae), an ultrastructural study. Grana 38: 343-355.
23. Holsinger KE, Feldman MW, Christiansen FB. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. American Naturalist 124: 446-453.
24. Hong S-P, Moon H-K. 2003. Gynodioecy in Lycopus maackianus Makino (Lamiaceae) in Korea: floral dimorphism and nutlet production. Flora 198: 461-467.
25. Ietswaart JH. 1980. A taxonomic revision of the genus Origanum (Labiatae). Leiden: Leiden University Press (Leiden botanical series, 4).
26. Kesseli R, Jain SK. 1984. An ecological genetic study of gynodioecy in Limnanthes douglasii (Limnanthaceae). American Journal of Botany 71: 775-786.
27. Lewis D. 1941. Male-sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytologist 40: 56-63.
28. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 135-162.
29. Manicacci D, Atlan A, Rossello JAE, Couvet D. 1998. Gynodioecy and reproductive trait variation in three Thymus species (Lamiaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 159: 948-957.
30. Navarro L. 1997. Is the dichogamy of Salvia verbenaca (Lamiaceae) an effective barrier to self-fertilization? Plant Systematics and Evolution 207: 111-117.
31. Owens SJ, Ubera-Jiménez JL. 1992. Breeding systems in Labiatae. In: Harley RM, Reynolds T, eds. Advances in Labiatae science. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 257-280.
32. van der Pijl L. 1972. Functional considerations and observations on the flowers of some Labiatae. Blumea 20: 93-103.
33. Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A. 1996. The natural history of pollination. London: Harper Collins.
34. Puterbaugh MN, Wied A, Galen C. 1997. The functional ecology of gynodioecy in Eritrichum aretioides (Boraginaceae), the alpine forget-me-not. American Journal of Botany 84: 393-400.
35. Richards AJ. 1986. Plant breeding systems. London: Unwin Hyman.
36. Rodríguez-Riaño T, Dafni A. 2000. A new procedure to assess pollen viability. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12: 241-244.
37. Roiz L, Dulberger R. 1989. Gynodioecy in Teucrium polium L. (Lamiaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: (suppl.): 121-122.
38. Ross MD. 1978. The evolution of gynodioecy and subdioecy. Evolution 32: 174-188.
39. Ross MD. 1980. The evolution and decay of overdominance during the evolution of gynodioecy, subdioecy, and dioecy. The American Naturalist 116: 607-620.
40. Sokal RR, Rohlf F. J. 1981. Biometría. Madrid: Blume H.
41. Stout AB. 1928. Dichogamy in flowering plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 55: 141-153.
42. Thompson JD, Manicacci D, Tarayre M. 1998. Thirty-five years of thyme: a tale of two polymorphisms. BioScience 48: 805-815.
43. Ubera-Jiménez JL, Hidalgo-Fernández PJ. 1992. Temporal gynodioecy in Rosmarinus officinalis. In: Harley RM, Reynolds T, eds. Advances in Labiatae science. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 281-289.
44. Vaarama A, Jääskeläinen O. 1967. Studies on gynodioecism in the finish populations of Geranium sylvaticum L. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. Ser. A, IV, Biologica 108: 1-39.
45. Webb CJ, Lloyd DG. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms II. Herkogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 163-178.