Gynodioecy in Lycopus maackianus Makino (Lamiaceae) in Korea: Floral dimorphism and nutlet production

Flora

Volumn 198, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 461-467

  Hong, Suk Pyo ^a   Moon, Hye Kyoung ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Floral dimorphism; Gynodioecy; Lamiaceae; Lycopus maackianus; Nutlet production; Plant breeding systems

Indexed keywords

DIMORPHISM; FLORAL TRAIT; GYNODIOECY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA;

COROLLA; LAMIACEAE; LYCOPUS; LYCOPUS MAACKIANUS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0346996983     PISSN: 03672530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1078/0367-2530-00119     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. ALONSO, C. & HERRERA, C. M. (2001): Neither vegetative nor reproductive advantages account for high frequency of male-steriles in southern Spanish gynodioecious Daphne laureola (Thymelaeaceae). - Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1016-1024.
2. ASHMAN, T. L. (1994): Reproductive allocation in hermaphrodites and females of Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata using four currencies. - Amer. J. Bot. 78: 504-514.
3. ASHMAN, T. L. (1999): Determinants of sex allocation in gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. - J. Evol. Biol. 12: 648-661.
4. ASHMAN, T. L. & STANTON, M. (1991): Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of sexually dimorphic Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae). - Ecology 72: 993-1003.
5. ASSOUAD, M. W.; DOMMÈE, B.; LUMARET, R. & VALDEYRON, G. (1978): Reproductive capacities in the sexual forms of the gynodioecious species Thymus vulgaris L. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 29-39.
6. BAKER, H. G. (1948): Corolla-size in gynodioecious and gynomonoecious species of flowering plants. - Proc. Leeds Philos. Lit. Soc. 2: 136-139.
7. BAWA, K. (1979): Breeding systems of trees in a tropical wet forest. - New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 521-524.
8. BAWA, K. (1980): The evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. - Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-39.
9. BELL, G. (1985): On the function of flowers. - Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 224: 223-265.
10. CHARLESWORTH, D. & CHARLESWORTH, B. (1978): A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. - Amer. Naturalist 112: 975-997.
11. CHARLESWORTH, D. & CHARLESWORTH, B. (1987): The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. - Evolution 41: 948-968.
12. DARWIN, C. R. (1877): The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. - Murray, London.
13. DE JONG, T. J.; WASER, N. M. & KLINKHAMMER, P. G. L. (1993): Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. -Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 321-325.
14. DELPH, L. F. (1996): Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In: LLOYD, D. G. & BARRETT, S. C. H. (eds.): Floral biology: Studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. 217-237. - Chapman & Hall, New York.
15. DELPH, L. F. & LLOYD, D. G. (1991): Environmental and genetic control of gender in the dimorphic shrub Hebe subalpina. - Evolution 45: 1957-1964.
16. DELPH, L. F.; GALLOWAY, L. F. & STANTON, M. L. (1996): Sexual dimorphism in flower size. - Amer. Naturalist 148: 299-320.
17. EAST, E. M. (1940): The distribution of self-sterility in the flowering plants. - Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 82: 449-518.
18. ECKHART, V. M. (1991): The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). - Evol. Ecol. 5: 370-384.
19. ECKHART, V. M. (1992): Resource compensation and the evolution of gynodioecy in of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). - Evolution 46: 1313-1328.
20. ECKHART, V. M. (1999): Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: GEBER, M. A.; DAWSON, T. E. & DELPH, L. F. (eds.): Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. 123-148. Springer, Berlin.
21. GEBER, M. A. (1985): The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia ciliata. - Ecology 66: 762-772.
22. GEBER, M. A.; DAWSON, T. E. & DELPH, L. F. (eds.) (1999): Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin.
23. GILL, L. S. (1980): Reproductive biology of Canadian Labiatae. - Phytologia 47: 89-96.
24. HALEY, M. M (1992): The potential value of pollen morphology as an additional taxonomic character in subtribe Ocimenae (Ocimeae: Nepetoideae: Labiatae). In: HARLEY, R.M. & REYNOLDS, T. (eds.): Advances in Labiatae science. 125-138. - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
25. HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. & SHIVANNA, K. R. (1977): The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. - Ann. Bot. 41: 1233-1258.
26. HONG, S. P. (1993): Reconsideration of the generic status of Rubrivena (Polygonaceae, Persicarieae). - Pl. Syst. Evol. 186: 95-122.
27. HONG, S. P. & HAN, M. J. (2002): The floral dimorphism in the rare endemic plant, Abeliophyllum distichum NAKAI (Oleaceae). - Flora 197: 317-325.
28. KNUTH, P. (1899): Handbuch der Blütenbiologie, no. 2 (2). -W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
29. KNUTH, P. (1905): Handbuch der Blütenbiologie, no. 3 (1). -W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
30. KOHN, J. R. (1989): Sex ratio, seed production, biomass allocation and the cost of male function in Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). - Evolution 43: 1424-1434.
31. LI, X. & HEDGE, I. C. (1994): Lycopus. In: WU, Z. Y. & RAVEN, P. H. (eds.): Flora of China, Vol. 17, 239-241. Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden, Beijing and St. Louis.
32. LLOYD, D. G. (1975): The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. - Genetica 45: 325-339.
33. LLOYD, D. G. & WEBB, C. J. (1977): Secondary sex characters in plants. - Bot. Rev. 43: 177-216.
34. MAKI, M. (1993): Outcrossing and fecundity advantage of females in gynodioecious Chionographis japonica var. kurohimensis (Liliaceae). - Amer. J. Bot. 80: 629-634.
35. OWENS, S. J. & UBERA-JIMÈNEZ, J. L. (1992): Breeding systems in Labiatae. In: HARLEY, R. M. & REYNOLDS, T. (eds.): Advances in Labiate Science. 257-280. - Royal Botanic Garden, Kew.
36. PHILIPP, M. (1980): Reproductive biology of Stellaria longipes GOLDIE as revealed by a cultivation experiment. -New Phytol. 85: 557-569.
37. nd ed. -Chapman and Hall, London.
38. ROBERSTON, A. W. (1992): The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy in Myosotis colensoi (KIRK) MCBRIDE (Boraginaceae). - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 46: 333-349.
39. Ross, M. D. (1978): The evolution of gynodioecy and subdioecy. - Evolution 32: 174-188.
40. SAKAI, A. K.; WELLER, S. G.; CHEN, M. L.; CHOU, S. Y. & TASANONT, K. (1997): Evolution of gynodioecy and the maintenance of female: The role of inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates, and resource allocation in Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae). - Evolution 51: 724-736.
41. SCHEMSKE, D. W. & ÅGREN, J. (1995): Deceit pollination and selection on female flower size in Begonia involucrate: an experimental approach. - Evolution 49: 207-214.
42. SHYKOFF, J. A. (1988): Maintenance of gynodioecy in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae): Stage specific fecundity and viability selection. - Amer. J. Bot. 75: 844-850.
43. SNOW, A. A.; SPIRA, T. P.; SIMPSON, R. & KLIPS, R. A. (1996): The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In: LLOYD, D. G. & BARRETT, S. C. H. (eds.): Floral biology: Studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. 191-216. -Chapman and Hall, New York.
44. STEVENS, D. P. (1988): On the gynodioecious polymorphism in Saxifraga granulata L. (Saxifragaceae). - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 15-28.
45. WOLFE, L. & SHMIDA, A. (1997): The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious Israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus). - Ecology 78: 101-110.
46. YAMPOLSKY, E. & YAMPOLSKY, H. (1922): The distribution of sex forms in the phanaerogamic flora. - Biblioth. Genet. 3: 1-59.