Male sterility, protogyny, and pollen-pistil interference in Plantago maritima (Plantaginaceae), a wind-pollinated, self-incompatible perennial

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 1588-1594

  Dinnétz, Patrik ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Gynodioecy; Plantaginaceae; Plantago maritima; Pollen pistil interference; Protogyny; Self incompatibility; Wind pollination

Indexed keywords

HERMAPHRODITISM; MALE STERILITY; POLLINATION; PROTOGYNY; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY; WINF POLLINATION;

PLANTAGINACEAE; PLANTAGO ,ARITIMA; PLANTAGO MARITIMA; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 0342460482     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2446621     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ATLAN, A., P. H. GOUYON, T. FOURNIAL, D. POMENTE, AND D. COUVET. 1992. Sex allocation in an hermaphroditic plant: the case of gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5: 189-203.
2. BAWA, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 11: 15-39.
3. BARRETT, S. C. H., L. D. HARDER, AND W. W. COLE. 1994. Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilisation in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontaderiaceae). Functional Ecology 8: 526-535.
4. _, D. G. LLOYD, AND J. ARROYO. 1996. Stylar polymorphism and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett [eds.], Flower biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
5. BERTIN, R. I., AND C. M. NEWMAN. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Botanical Review 59: 112-152.
6. BLOM, C. W. T. M. 1983. Plasticity of life history characteristics in two different populations of Plantago maritima. Oecologia Plantarum 4: 377-394.
7. BOS, M., H. HARMENS, AND K. VRIELING. 1986. Gene flow in Plantago. I. Gene flow and neighborhood size in P. lanceolata. Heredity 56: 43-54.
8. _, AND E. VAN DER HARNING. 1988. Gene flow in Plantago. II. Gene flow pattern and population structure. Heredity 61: 1-11.
9. BURD, M., AND T. F. H. ALLEN. 1988. Sexual allocation strategy in wind pollinated plants. Evolution 42: 403-407.
10. CHARLESWORTH, B., AND D. CHARLESWORTH. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
11. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1981. A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in gynodioecious species. Heredity 46: 27-39.
12. _, AND M. T. MORGAN. 1991. Allocation of resources to sex functions in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 332: 91-102.
13. CHARNOV, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univerity Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. _, J. MAYNARD SMITH, AND J. J. BULL. 1976. Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 263: 125-126.
15. CORRIVEAU, J. L., AND A. W. COLEMAN. 1988. Rapid screening methode to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species. American Journal of Botany 75: 1433-1458.
16. COSMIDES, L. M., AND J. TOOBY. 1981. Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology 89: 83-129.
17. COUVET, D., A. ATLAN, E. BELHASSEN, C. GLIDDON, P. H. GOUYON, AND F. KJELLBERG. 1990. Co-evolution between two symbionts: the case of cytoplasmic male-sterility in higher plants. Oxford Survey of Evolutionary Biology 7: 225-249.
18. DE JONG, T. J., N. M. WASER, AND P. G. L. KLINKHAMER. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 321-325.
19. _, _, M. V. PRICE, AND R. M. RING. 1992. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 89: 310-315.
20. DINNÉTZ, P., AND L. JERLING. 1997. Gynodioecy in Plantago maritima L.; no compensation for loss of male function. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 46: 193-206.
21. ECKHART, V. M. 1992. Resource compensation and the evolution of gynodioecy in Phacelia linearis (Hydropyllaceae). Evolution 46: 1313-1328.
22. FRANK, S. A. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. American Naturalist 133: 345-376.
23. GOUYON, P. H., AND D. COUVET. 1985. Selfish cytoplasm and adaption: variations in the reproductive system of thyme. In J. Heack and J. W. Woldendorp [eds.], Structure and functioning of plant populations. II. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
24. _, F. VICHOT, AND J. M. M. VAN DAMME. 1991. Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single-point equilibria versus limit cycles. American Naturalist 137: 498-514.
25. KESSELI, R., AND S. K. JAIN. 1984. An ecological genetic study of gynodioecy in Limnanthes douglasii (Limnantaceae). American Journal of Botany 71: 775-786.
26. KIKUZAWA, K. 1989. Floral biology and evolution of gynodioecism in Daphne kamtchatica var. jezoensis. Oikos 56: 196-202.
27. LEVIN, D. A. 1988. The paternity pools of plants. American Naturalist 132: 309-317.
28. LEWIS, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytologist 40: 56-63.
29. LLOYD, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 56-63.
30. _. 1976. The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theoretical Population Biology 9: 299-316.
31. _, AND C. J. WEBB. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 135-162.
32. MATHER, K. 1940. Outbreeding and separation of the sexes. Nature 145: 484-487.
33. MIGLIA, K. J., AND D. D. FREEMAN. 1996. Delayed pollination, stigma length, sex expression, and progeny sex ratio in spinach, Spinacea oleracea (Chenopodiaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 126-332.
34. MOGENSEN, H. L. 1996. The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants. American Journal of Botany 83: 383-404.
35. MULCAHY, D. L., AND G. B. MULCAHY. 1987. The effects of pollen competition. American Scientist 75: 44-50.
36. NIKLAS, K. J. 1985. The aerodynamics of wind pollination. Botanical Review 51: 328-386.
37. PELLMYR, O. 1987. Multiple sex expression in Cimicifuga simplex: dichogamy destabilizes hermaphroditism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 31: 161-174.
38. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
39. SAUMITOU-LAPRADE, P., J. CUGUEN, AND P. VERNET. 1994. Cytoplasmic male sterility in plants: molecular evidence and the nucleocytoplasmic conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 431-435.
40. SCHULTZ, S. T. 1994. Nucleo-cytoplasmic male sterility and alternative routes to dioecy. Evolution 48: 1933-1945.
41. SEAVEY, S. R., AND K. S. BAWA. 1986. Late acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. The Botanical Review 52: 195-219.
42. STACE, H. M. 1995. Protogyny, self-incompatibility and pollination in Anthocercis gracilis (Solanaceae) Australian Journal of Botany 43: 451-459.
43. VAN DAMME, J. M. M. 1991. A restorer gene in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus subjected to selection in the gametophytic and seedling stage. Heredity 66: 19-27.
44. _. 1992. Selection for the maintenance of sex polymorphism in Plantago. In P. J. C. Kuiper and M. Bos [eds.], Plantago, a multidisciplinary study. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
45. WASER, N. M., AND M. PRICE. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1036-1043.
46. WEINS, D., C. L CALVIN, C. A WILSON, C. I. DAVERN, D. FRANK, AND S. R. SEAVEY. 1987. Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion and genetic load in flowering plants. Oecologia 71: 501-509.
47. WHITEHEAD, D. R. 1983. Wind pollination: some ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In L. Real [ed.] Pollination ecology. Academic Press, London.
48. WILLSON, M. F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113: 777-790.
49. YOUNG, K. A., AND J. SCHMITT. 1995. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity of pollen release and capture height in Plantago lanceolata. Functional Ecology 9: 725-733.