The 8 Learning Events Model (8LEM): A pedagogic conceptual framework for the design of dedicated (and generic?) scenarios

IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 503-508

  Verpoorten, D ^a   Poumay, M ^a   Leclercq, D ^a  

^a LabSET (ULg)   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Learning paradigms; Patterns; Pedagogic scenarios; Personalization; Reusability

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; LEARNING PARADIGMS; PATTERNS; PEDAGOGIC SCENARIOS; PERSONALIZATIONS; REFERENCE FRAMEWORKS; REFERENCE MODELING;

CURRICULA; DESIGN; REUSABILITY; TEACHING; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34547728874     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Baumgartner, P., & Bergner I., (2003). Categorization of Virtual Learning Activities. Proceedings of the International Workshop ICL2003, Villach / Austria 24-26 September 2003, CD-ROM. Villach, Kassel University Press.
2. Casey, J., Greller, W. & Brosnan, K. (2005). Prospects for Using Learning Objects and Learning Design as Staff Development Tools in Higher Education. In: "Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age," CELDA 2005 Conference, Porto 2005
3. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., et al (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A critical and comprehensive review of learning style research, highlighting 13 core learning styles, London, Learning and Skills Research Centre.
4. Friesen, N. (2004). Learning objects and standards: Pedagogical neutrality and engagement. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Joensuu, Finland. August 30, 2004. [Available online: http://phenom.educ.ualberta.ca/n/papers/learning-objects-pedagogical- neutrality.pdf].
5. Gagné, R.M. & Briggs, L.J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2e ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Goodyear, P., (2004). Towards a pattern language for networked learning, Proceedings of Networked Learning 2004.
7. Griffiths, D, (2004), The role of teachers in editing and authoring Units of Learning using IMS Learning Design, Discussion paper for UNFOLD on-line seminar, January 2005.
8. Ip, A., (2005). BECTA's Packaging and Publishing LOs: Best Practice Guidelines. [Available online http://elearningrandomwalk.blogspot.com/2005/03/ bectas-packaging-and-publishing-los.html].
9. Koper, E.J.R. (2003). Combining re-usable learning resources and services to pedagogical purposeful units of learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning (pp. 46-59). London: Kogan Page.
10. Leclercq, D. & Poumay, M. (2005). The 8 learning Events Model. Release 2005. [Available online on LabSET's (ULg) website: http://www.labset. net/media/prod/8LEM.pdf].
11. Littlejohn, A. & Buckingham Shum, S., (2003). Reusing Online Resources, (Special Issue) Journal of Interactive Media in Education. [Available online: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2003.html].
12. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., Dalziel, J., (2003). Patterns, designs and activities: unifying descriptions of learning structures, Draft of paper submitted to Journal for review August 2004. [Update of February 2005 available online: http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/document.cfm?docid=5295].
13. Melis, E. & Monthienvichienchai, R. (2004). They Call It Learning Style But It's so Much More. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (eLearn-2004), pages 1383-1390, 2004.
14. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two, Psychological Review, Vol. 63, 81-97.
15. Poumay, M, (2005). Quality evaluation - A challenge for online courses and catalogues. In E. Gard (Ed.), Emdel: a model for valorizatin of elearning in a knowledge society, p. 31-40, Oslo
16. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. (pp. 5-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Robotham, D., (1999). The application of learning style theory in higher education teaching. Wolverhampton Business School, University of Wolverhampton. [Available online: http://www2.glos.ac.uk/gdn/discuss/kolb2.htm
18. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (Ed.) Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. Wiley (Ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
20. Wiley, D. (Ed.) (2002). The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. [available online: http://www.reusability.org/read/].
21. Wiley, D. (2000), Learning Object Design and Sequencing Theory, Dept of Instructional Psychology and Technology, Brigham Young University. [Available online: http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/dissertation.pdf].