Exploring peptide-likeness of active molecules using 2D fingerprint methods

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1366-1378

  Eckert, Hanna ^a   Bajorath, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMIDES; BIOACTIVITY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PEPTIDES; SEARCH ENGINES;

FINGERPRINT METHODS; PEPTIDE-LIKE MOLECULES; PEPTIDOMIMETIC TRANSITIONS;

DATA PRIVACY;

PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DATA BASE; DRUG DESIGN;

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DRUG DESIGN; PEPTIDES;

EID: 34547702169     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci700086m     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
2. Willett, P. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11, 1046-1053.
3. Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: Foundations, limitations and novel approaches. Drug Discovery Today 2007, 12, 225-233.
4. Green, D. V. Virtual screening of virtual libraries. Prog. Med. Chem. 2003, 41, 61-97.
5. Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 882-894.
6. Cramer, R. D.; Jilek, R. J.; Guessregen, S.; Clark, S. J.; Wendt, B.; Clark, R. D. "Lead hopping". Validation of topomer similarity as a superior predictor of biological activities. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6777-6791.
7. Schneider, G.; Schneider, P.; Renner, S. Scaffold-hopping: How far can we jump? QSAR Comb. Sci. 2006, 25, 1162-1171.
8. Huang, D.; Luthi, U.; Kolb, P.; Edler, K.; Cecchini, M.; Audetat, S.; Barberis, A.; Caflisch, A. Discovery of cell-permeable non-peptide inhibitors of β-secretase by high-throughput docking and continuum electrostatics calculations. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5108-5111.
9. Huang, N.; Nagarsekar, A.; Xia, G.; Hayashi, J.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Identification of non-phosphate-containing small molecular weight inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase p56 Lek SH2 domain via in silico screening against the pY + 3 binding site. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3502-3511.
10. Thaisrivongs, S.; Janakiraman, M. N.; Chong, K.-T.; Tomich, P. K.; Dolak, L. A.; Turner, S. R.; Strohbach, J. W.; Lynn, J. C.; Horng, M.-M.; Hinshaw, R. R.; Watenpaugh, K. D. Structure-based design of novel HIV protease inhibitors: Sulfonamide-containing 4-hydroxy-coumarins and 4-hydroxy-2-pyrones as potent non-peptidic inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2400-2410.
11. Debnath, A. K.; Radigan, L.; Jiang, S. Structure-based identification of small molecule antiviral compounds targeted to the gp41 core structure of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3203-3209.
12. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32, 335-373.
13. Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 2004, 432, 862-865.
14. Lyne, P. D. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 1047-1055.
15. Kitchen, D. B.; Decomez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 935-949.
16. Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1189-1202.
17. Bajorath, J. Selected concepts and investigations in compound classification, molecular descriptor analysis, and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 233-245.
18. Willett, P. Searching techniques for databases of two- and three-dimensional chemical structures. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4183-4199.
19. James, C. A.; Weininger, D. Daylight Theory Manual; Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc.: Irvine, CA.
20. McGregor, M. J.; Pallai, P. V. Clustering of large databases of compounds: Using MDL "keys" as structural descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 443-448.
21. Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical fragment generation and clustering software. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 141-142.
22. Bender, A.; Mussa, Y.; Glen, R. C.; Reiling, S. Molecular similarity searching using atom environments, information-based feature selection, and a naïve Bayesian classifier. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 170-178.
23. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: Use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 462-470.
24. Hert, J.; Willet, P.; Wilton, D. J. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1177-1185.
25. Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Searching for molecules with similar biological activity: Analysis by fingerprint profiling. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2000, 5, 566-575.
26. Xue, L.; Stahura, F. L.; Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Fingerprint scaling increases the probability of identifying molecules with similar activity in virtual screening calculations. J. Chem. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 746-753.
27. Schuffenhauer, A.; Floersheim, P.; Acklin, P.; Jacoby, E. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target protein. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 391-405.
28. Flower, D. R. On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379-386.
29. Molecular Drug Data Report (MDDR), version 2005.2; MDL Elsevier: San Leandro, CA, 2005.
30. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Distribution of molecular scaffolds and R-groups isolated from large compound databases. J. Mol. Model. 1999, 5, 97-102.
31. MACCS structural keys; MDL Elsevier: San Leandro, CA, 2002.
32. Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D.; Underwood, D. J.; Kearsley, S. K. Chemical similarity using geometric atom pair descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 128-136.
33. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment), version 2005.06; Chemical Computing Group Inc.: Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2005.
34. MOLPRINT 2D. http://www.molprint.com (accessed Feb 2006).
35. Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Design and evaluation of a novel class-directed 2D fingerprint to search for structurally diverse active compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2515-2526.
36. Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges for the identification of active compounds. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2284-2293.
37. Whittle, M.; Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: A comparison of similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2004, 44, 1840-1848.
38. Tovar, A.; Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Comparison of 2D fingerprint methods for multiple-template similarity searching on compound activity classes of increasing structural diversity. ChemMedChem 2007, 12, 225-233.
39. Shanmugasundaram, V.; Maggiora, G. M.; Lajiness, M. S. Hit-directed nearest-neighbor searching. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 240-248.
40. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. ZINC-A free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 177-182.